Does school context shape social and emotional learning implementation? A national study of teachers in urban, suburban, and rural schools

Joshua M. Lovett , Kimberly A. Schonert-Reichl , Summer S. Braun , Katherine Zinsser , Rebecca Teasdale , Annah Rogers
{"title":"Does school context shape social and emotional learning implementation? A national study of teachers in urban, suburban, and rural schools","authors":"Joshua M. Lovett ,&nbsp;Kimberly A. Schonert-Reichl ,&nbsp;Summer S. Braun ,&nbsp;Katherine Zinsser ,&nbsp;Rebecca Teasdale ,&nbsp;Annah Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.sel.2026.100203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social and emotional learning (SEL) is critical for student success, yet its implementation may vary across different school contexts in the U.S. This study investigated differences in SEL program usage, the integration of SEL into academic instruction, and perceived facilitators and barriers among K–12 teachers in rural, suburban, and urban schools. A cross-sectional design was used to analyze nationally representative survey data from 3897 U.S. public school teachers. Analyses revealed a consistent pattern: compared to teachers in urban and suburban schools, teachers in rural schools reported significantly less use of commercial and school-developed SEL programs, lower rates of integration of SEL into academic instruction, and fewer institutional supports (e.g., SEL-related school improvement plans, professional development opportunities). Furthermore, teachers in rural settings reported significantly greater barriers to implementation, including lack of funding for SEL, insufficient SEL-related resources, and the perception that SEL was not a district priority, compared to those in urban and suburban settings. Taken together, these findings highlight a systemic resource and priority gap that positions students in rural schools for inequitable access to social and emotional development opportunities. Results underscore a critical need for targeted policies, funding, and professional development to build capacity and support high-quality SEL in rural educational contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101165,"journal":{"name":"Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Emotional Learning: Research, Practice, and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773233926000252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social and emotional learning (SEL) is critical for student success, yet its implementation may vary across different school contexts in the U.S. This study investigated differences in SEL program usage, the integration of SEL into academic instruction, and perceived facilitators and barriers among K–12 teachers in rural, suburban, and urban schools. A cross-sectional design was used to analyze nationally representative survey data from 3897 U.S. public school teachers. Analyses revealed a consistent pattern: compared to teachers in urban and suburban schools, teachers in rural schools reported significantly less use of commercial and school-developed SEL programs, lower rates of integration of SEL into academic instruction, and fewer institutional supports (e.g., SEL-related school improvement plans, professional development opportunities). Furthermore, teachers in rural settings reported significantly greater barriers to implementation, including lack of funding for SEL, insufficient SEL-related resources, and the perception that SEL was not a district priority, compared to those in urban and suburban settings. Taken together, these findings highlight a systemic resource and priority gap that positions students in rural schools for inequitable access to social and emotional development opportunities. Results underscore a critical need for targeted policies, funding, and professional development to build capacity and support high-quality SEL in rural educational contexts.
学校环境是否影响社会和情感学习的实施?一项针对城市、郊区和农村学校教师的全国性研究
社会和情感学习(SEL)对学生的成功至关重要,但它的实施在美国不同的学校背景下可能会有所不同。本研究调查了SEL项目使用的差异,SEL融入学术教学的情况,以及农村、郊区和城市学校K-12教师感知到的促进因素和障碍。采用横断面设计分析3897年 U.S.的全国代表性调查数据公立学校教师。分析揭示了一个一致的模式:与城市和郊区学校的教师相比,农村学校的教师使用商业和学校开发的SEL课程的次数明显减少,SEL融入学术教学的比例较低,机构支持(例如,与SEL相关的学校改进计划,专业发展机会)较少。此外,与城市和郊区的教师相比,农村教师报告的实施障碍明显更大,包括缺乏SEL资金,SEL相关资源不足,以及认为SEL不是地区优先考虑的问题。综上所述,这些发现突出了系统性资源和优先级差距,使农村学校的学生无法公平地获得社会和情感发展机会。结果表明,迫切需要有针对性的政策、资金和专业发展来建设能力,并支持农村教育背景下的高质量SEL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书