Enhanced Ant Lion Optimizer for cascade (1+PI)-PIDF control in hydro-thermal power systems with capacitive storage

IF 3.8 Q3 Mathematics
Results in Control and Optimization Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-06 DOI:10.1016/j.rico.2026.100749
Wassana Kasemsin , Sitthisak Audomsi , Worawat Sa-Ngiamvibool , Sarawoot Boonkirdram
{"title":"Enhanced Ant Lion Optimizer for cascade (1+PI)-PIDF control in hydro-thermal power systems with capacitive storage","authors":"Wassana Kasemsin ,&nbsp;Sitthisak Audomsi ,&nbsp;Worawat Sa-Ngiamvibool ,&nbsp;Sarawoot Boonkirdram","doi":"10.1016/j.rico.2026.100749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is becoming harder to keep the frequency steady in linked power systems since demand is changing in ways that can not be expected, the systems are getting more complicated, and more renewable energy sources are being used. When there are random disturbances and fast changes in load, classic controllers like PI and PID typically do not work as well as they might because of how the system works. This work introduces a cascade (1+PI)-PIDF controller for automated generation control (AGC) in a two-area hydro-thermal power system using capacitive energy storage (CES). The suggested cascade architecture keeps global ACE control independent from local frequency stability. This improves transient responsiveness and steady-state performance compared to standard single-loop controllers. The EALO approach makes global search operate better and stops controller settings from converging too quickly by using random perturbation and adaptive exploration. MATLAB/Simulink examines how effectively the controller operates with step load disturbances by using four objective functions: IAE, ITAE, ISE, and ITSE. The optimization process is done across 30 different trials, each with 50 iterations, to make sure the results are statistically sound. The simulation results show that the suggested cascade controller makes controlling load frequency much better. The suggested technique gets an ITAE value of 0.0068 in the ITAE-based optimization context. The regular PIDF controller gets 0.0643, while the 1+PI controller gets 0.2540. After a step load disruption, the time it takes for the frequency to settle goes from around 14 s to about 3–4 s.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34733,"journal":{"name":"Results in Control and Optimization","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100749"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Control and Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666720726000974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is becoming harder to keep the frequency steady in linked power systems since demand is changing in ways that can not be expected, the systems are getting more complicated, and more renewable energy sources are being used. When there are random disturbances and fast changes in load, classic controllers like PI and PID typically do not work as well as they might because of how the system works. This work introduces a cascade (1+PI)-PIDF controller for automated generation control (AGC) in a two-area hydro-thermal power system using capacitive energy storage (CES). The suggested cascade architecture keeps global ACE control independent from local frequency stability. This improves transient responsiveness and steady-state performance compared to standard single-loop controllers. The EALO approach makes global search operate better and stops controller settings from converging too quickly by using random perturbation and adaptive exploration. MATLAB/Simulink examines how effectively the controller operates with step load disturbances by using four objective functions: IAE, ITAE, ISE, and ITSE. The optimization process is done across 30 different trials, each with 50 iterations, to make sure the results are statistically sound. The simulation results show that the suggested cascade controller makes controlling load frequency much better. The suggested technique gets an ITAE value of 0.0068 in the ITAE-based optimization context. The regular PIDF controller gets 0.0643, while the 1+PI controller gets 0.2540. After a step load disruption, the time it takes for the frequency to settle goes from around 14 s to about 3–4 s.

Abstract Image

带电容存储的水火发电系统级联(1+PI)-PIDF控制的增强型Ant Lion优化器
由于需求以不可预期的方式变化,系统变得越来越复杂,并且使用了更多的可再生能源,因此在互联电力系统中保持频率稳定变得越来越困难。当有随机干扰和负载的快速变化时,由于系统的工作方式,像PI和PID这样的经典控制器通常不能很好地工作。本文介绍了一种级联(1+PI)-PIDF控制器,用于使用电容储能(CES)的两区水火发电系统的自动发电控制(AGC)。建议的级联结构使全局ACE控制独立于局部频率稳定性。与标准单回路控制器相比,这提高了瞬态响应性和稳态性能。EALO方法通过使用随机扰动和自适应探索,使全局搜索更好地运行,并防止控制器设置过快收敛。MATLAB/Simulink通过使用四个目标函数:IAE, ITAE, ISE和ITSE来检查控制器如何有效地处理阶跃负载干扰。优化过程通过30个不同的试验来完成,每个试验有50次迭代,以确保结果在统计上是合理的。仿真结果表明,所提出的串级控制器能较好地控制负载频率。在基于ITAE的优化上下文中,建议的技术的ITAE值为0.0068。常规的PIDF控制器得到0.0643,而1+PI控制器得到0.2540。在阶跃负载中断后,频率稳定所需的时间从14秒左右变为3-4秒左右。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Control and Optimization
Results in Control and Optimization Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书