A novel hybrid Zebra-Archimedes Optimization Algorithm for DG placement and sizing: Single and multi-objective performance analysis

IF 3.8 Q3 Mathematics
Results in Control and Optimization Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.rico.2026.100716
Prisma Megantoro , Syahirah Abd Halim , Muhammad Rafi Nabil Arsalan , Makbul A.M. Ramli , Nor Azwan Mohamed Kamari , Ahmad H. Milyani
{"title":"A novel hybrid Zebra-Archimedes Optimization Algorithm for DG placement and sizing: Single and multi-objective performance analysis","authors":"Prisma Megantoro ,&nbsp;Syahirah Abd Halim ,&nbsp;Muhammad Rafi Nabil Arsalan ,&nbsp;Makbul A.M. Ramli ,&nbsp;Nor Azwan Mohamed Kamari ,&nbsp;Ahmad H. Milyani","doi":"10.1016/j.rico.2026.100716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study proposes a novel hybrid Zebra-Archimedes Optimization Algorithm (Z-AOA) for optimal distributed generation (DG) placement and sizing in the IEEE 57-bus system. The Z-AOA merges the strong exploration ability of the Zebra Optimization Algorithm (ZOA) with the precise exploitation capability of the Archimedes Optimization Algorithm (AOA). This hybridization allows the algorithm to search widely for potential solutions while fine-tuning them effectively. The unique strength of Z-AOA lies in its adaptive switching mechanism between exploration and exploitation phases, and ensuring optimal balance throughout the optimization process. This characteristic makes Z-AOA particularly effective for complex, multi-dimensional power system optimization problems. The optimization framework incorporates essential technical constraints, including generator capacity limits, bus voltage magnitude thresholds, and reactive power boundaries. Single-objective variants independently minimize active power loss, voltage deviation, and voltage stability index. Meanwhile, multi-objective variants simultaneously minimize both power loss and voltage deviation using weighted sum method with Pareto front analysis. Simulation results validate the superiority of the proposed Z-AOA, achieving 52.72% power loss reduction and 99.9% voltage regulation compliance. This performance outperforms standalone AOA, which achieves 51.91% reduction and 98.2% compliance. The multi-objective Z-AOA provides balanced trade-offs with 48.54% power loss reduction and 30.20% voltage deviation reduction. Comprehensive comparisons against various categories of metaheuristic algorithms demonstrate the competitive performance of the proposed approach. These categories include swarm-based, physics-based, and evolutionary-based methods. Wilcoxon signed-rank statistical tests further confirm the significant performance advantage of the novel Z-AOA across all optimization objectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34733,"journal":{"name":"Results in Control and Optimization","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100716"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Control and Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666720726000640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes a novel hybrid Zebra-Archimedes Optimization Algorithm (Z-AOA) for optimal distributed generation (DG) placement and sizing in the IEEE 57-bus system. The Z-AOA merges the strong exploration ability of the Zebra Optimization Algorithm (ZOA) with the precise exploitation capability of the Archimedes Optimization Algorithm (AOA). This hybridization allows the algorithm to search widely for potential solutions while fine-tuning them effectively. The unique strength of Z-AOA lies in its adaptive switching mechanism between exploration and exploitation phases, and ensuring optimal balance throughout the optimization process. This characteristic makes Z-AOA particularly effective for complex, multi-dimensional power system optimization problems. The optimization framework incorporates essential technical constraints, including generator capacity limits, bus voltage magnitude thresholds, and reactive power boundaries. Single-objective variants independently minimize active power loss, voltage deviation, and voltage stability index. Meanwhile, multi-objective variants simultaneously minimize both power loss and voltage deviation using weighted sum method with Pareto front analysis. Simulation results validate the superiority of the proposed Z-AOA, achieving 52.72% power loss reduction and 99.9% voltage regulation compliance. This performance outperforms standalone AOA, which achieves 51.91% reduction and 98.2% compliance. The multi-objective Z-AOA provides balanced trade-offs with 48.54% power loss reduction and 30.20% voltage deviation reduction. Comprehensive comparisons against various categories of metaheuristic algorithms demonstrate the competitive performance of the proposed approach. These categories include swarm-based, physics-based, and evolutionary-based methods. Wilcoxon signed-rank statistical tests further confirm the significant performance advantage of the novel Z-AOA across all optimization objectives.
一种新型混合斑马-阿基米德优化算法的DG布局和尺寸:单目标和多目标性能分析
本文提出了一种新的混合斑马-阿基米德优化算法(Z-AOA),用于优化IEEE 57总线系统中分布式发电(DG)的布局和尺寸。Z-AOA融合了斑马优化算法(ZOA)的强大探索能力和阿基米德优化算法(AOA)的精确开发能力。这种杂交使算法能够广泛地搜索潜在的解决方案,同时有效地对其进行微调。Z-AOA的独特优势在于其在勘探和开采阶段之间的自适应切换机制,并在整个优化过程中确保最优平衡。这种特性使得Z-AOA对复杂的、多维的电力系统优化问题特别有效。优化框架结合了必要的技术约束,包括发电机容量限制、母线电压幅度阈值和无功功率边界。单目标变体独立地最小化有功功率损耗,电压偏差和电压稳定指数。同时,采用Pareto前分析的加权和方法,实现多目标变量同时最小化功率损耗和电压偏差。仿真结果验证了所提出的Z-AOA的优越性,实现了52.72%的功耗降低和99.9%的稳压符合性。这种性能优于独立的AOA,后者实现了51.91%的减少和98.2%的遵从性。多目标Z-AOA提供了平衡的权衡,功率损耗降低48.54%,电压偏差降低30.20%。对各种类型的元启发式算法的综合比较证明了所提出的方法的竞争性能。这些分类包括基于群体的、基于物理的和基于进化的方法。Wilcoxon签名秩统计检验进一步证实了新型Z-AOA在所有优化目标上的显著性能优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Control and Optimization
Results in Control and Optimization Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书