Biological And Chemical Properties Of New Multi-functional Root Canal Irrigants

Dentistry Review Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-02 DOI:10.1016/j.dentre.2026.100384
Kevin Eppes
{"title":"Biological And Chemical Properties Of New Multi-functional Root Canal Irrigants","authors":"Kevin Eppes","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2026.100384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy of multi-functional root canal irrigating solutions in the removal of canal wall smear layers, antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and tissue dissolution efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Forty single-rooted teeth were mechanically instrumented and irrigated with Triton, EndoJuice™, EDTA, and 0.9% saline. Each tooth was evaluated for smear layer removal using scanning electron microscopy. Antibacterial activity of the irrigants was assessed against <em>Enterococcus faecalis</em> biofilms using colonyforming unit analysis. Neutral red, clonogenic, and cytokinesis-block micronucleus assays were performed on Chinese hamster V79 cells to evaluate the short-term and long-term cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the irrigants. Tissue dissolution efficacy was tested on shrimp meat placed in resorptive cavities prepared in root canals.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>EndoJuice™ and EDTA showed better smear layer removal than Triton in the coronal-third and middlethird of the canal walls. There was no significant difference between EndoJuice™ and EDTA. In the apical-third, EndoJuice™ removed the smear layer more effectively than EDTA and Triton. Specimens treated with saline were heavily smeared. Triton and sodium hypochlorite were similar in reducing intracanal <em>E. faecalis</em> counts, while specimens treated with EndoJuice™ had higher colony-forming units compared to Triton or sodium hypochlorite. EndoJuice™ was less cytotoxic and genotoxic compared to Triton. Sodium hypochlorite dissolved the most soft tissue, followed by Triton and EndoJuice™.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>EndoJuice™ was less toxic and more effective in smear layer removal. Triton demonstrated better antimicrobial activity and tissue dissolution efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>IMPLICATIONS</h3><div>Evaluating the smear layer removal, antibacterial activity, toxicity, and tissue dissolution abilities of multifunctional root canal irrigants is essential to ensure their effectiveness and safety for clinical use in root canal treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100384"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772559626002233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of multi-functional root canal irrigating solutions in the removal of canal wall smear layers, antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and tissue dissolution efficacy.

METHODS

Forty single-rooted teeth were mechanically instrumented and irrigated with Triton, EndoJuice™, EDTA, and 0.9% saline. Each tooth was evaluated for smear layer removal using scanning electron microscopy. Antibacterial activity of the irrigants was assessed against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms using colonyforming unit analysis. Neutral red, clonogenic, and cytokinesis-block micronucleus assays were performed on Chinese hamster V79 cells to evaluate the short-term and long-term cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the irrigants. Tissue dissolution efficacy was tested on shrimp meat placed in resorptive cavities prepared in root canals.

RESULTS

EndoJuice™ and EDTA showed better smear layer removal than Triton in the coronal-third and middlethird of the canal walls. There was no significant difference between EndoJuice™ and EDTA. In the apical-third, EndoJuice™ removed the smear layer more effectively than EDTA and Triton. Specimens treated with saline were heavily smeared. Triton and sodium hypochlorite were similar in reducing intracanal E. faecalis counts, while specimens treated with EndoJuice™ had higher colony-forming units compared to Triton or sodium hypochlorite. EndoJuice™ was less cytotoxic and genotoxic compared to Triton. Sodium hypochlorite dissolved the most soft tissue, followed by Triton and EndoJuice™.

CONCLUSIONS

EndoJuice™ was less toxic and more effective in smear layer removal. Triton demonstrated better antimicrobial activity and tissue dissolution efficacy.

IMPLICATIONS

Evaluating the smear layer removal, antibacterial activity, toxicity, and tissue dissolution abilities of multifunctional root canal irrigants is essential to ensure their effectiveness and safety for clinical use in root canal treatment.
新型多功能根管灌洗剂的生物化学特性研究
目的评价多功能根管冲洗液清除根管壁涂片层的效果、抗菌活性、细胞毒性和组织溶出效果。方法对40颗单根牙进行机械固定,并用Triton、EndoJuice™、EDTA和0.9%生理盐水冲洗。使用扫描电子显微镜评估每颗牙齿的涂抹层去除情况。采用菌落形成单元分析,评价了冲洗液对粪肠球菌生物膜的抑菌活性。对中国仓鼠V79细胞进行中性红、克隆性和细胞分裂阻断微核实验,评价灌洗剂的短期和长期细胞毒性和遗传毒性。将虾肉置于根管内制备的吸收腔中,对其组织溶解效果进行了试验。结果sendojuice™和EDTA在根管壁冠状三分之一和中三分之一的涂抹层去除效果优于Triton。EndoJuice™与EDTA之间无显著差异。在根尖三分之一处,EndoJuice™比EDTA和Triton更有效地去除涂抹层。用生理盐水处理的标本被大量涂抹。Triton和次氯酸钠在减少肛门内粪肠球菌计数方面相似,而与Triton或次氯酸钠相比,EndoJuice™处理的标本具有更高的菌落形成单位。与Triton相比,EndoJuice™具有更低的细胞毒性和基因毒性。次氯酸钠溶解的软组织最多,其次是Triton和EndoJuice™。结论sendojuice™对涂抹层的去除毒性小,效果好。Triton具有较好的抗菌活性和组织溶出效果。评价多功能根管冲洗剂的涂片层去除、抗菌活性、毒性和组织溶解能力对于确保其在临床根管治疗中的有效性和安全性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书