The Effect of Bonding Techniques on Bond Strength of Core Buildups in Simulated Endodontic Accesses in Zirconia Crowns

Dentistry Review Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-02 DOI:10.1016/j.dentre.2026.100413
Ahren Blake DDS
{"title":"The Effect of Bonding Techniques on Bond Strength of Core Buildups in Simulated Endodontic Accesses in Zirconia Crowns","authors":"Ahren Blake DDS","doi":"10.1016/j.dentre.2026.100413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective(s)</h3><div>Providers frequently opt to perform root canal therapy through pre-existing full-coverage restorations, subsequently repairing the access cavity with a composite restoration. The capacity to effectively bond zirconia remains a subject of ongoing debate. Particularly in the anterior region, zirconia crown restorations underscore the importance of evaluating the bond strength between composite restorations and zirconia crowns. The objective of this study is to assess whether the choice of bonding technique enhances the shear bond strength of repaired endodontic accesses in zirconia crowns.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Researchers milled forty zirconia discs to include a simulated endodontic access. The discs were divided into four groups consisting of dual cure and light cure resins bonded with two bonding systems. Researchers performed pushout testing using an Instron machine and evaluated the results using Fisher’s Exact test.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>The study found a statistically significant difference in shear bond strengths between dual-cure and light-cure adhesives with MDP, with a P-value of 0.023. No other groups showed statistical significance, although the dual-cure adhesive groups exhibited 2 to 4 times more bonded specimens than the light-cure adhesive samples.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings of this study underscore the ongoing challenges in achieving a durable bond between composite resins and zirconia materials. Despite the use of different resin-based materials and bonding systems, the bond strengths remain insufficient for achieving optimal clinical performance, especially in the anterior region where esthetics and longevity are paramount.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100364,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Review","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100413"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277255962600252X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective(s)

Providers frequently opt to perform root canal therapy through pre-existing full-coverage restorations, subsequently repairing the access cavity with a composite restoration. The capacity to effectively bond zirconia remains a subject of ongoing debate. Particularly in the anterior region, zirconia crown restorations underscore the importance of evaluating the bond strength between composite restorations and zirconia crowns. The objective of this study is to assess whether the choice of bonding technique enhances the shear bond strength of repaired endodontic accesses in zirconia crowns.

METHODS

Researchers milled forty zirconia discs to include a simulated endodontic access. The discs were divided into four groups consisting of dual cure and light cure resins bonded with two bonding systems. Researchers performed pushout testing using an Instron machine and evaluated the results using Fisher’s Exact test.

RESULTS

The study found a statistically significant difference in shear bond strengths between dual-cure and light-cure adhesives with MDP, with a P-value of 0.023. No other groups showed statistical significance, although the dual-cure adhesive groups exhibited 2 to 4 times more bonded specimens than the light-cure adhesive samples.

Conclusion

The findings of this study underscore the ongoing challenges in achieving a durable bond between composite resins and zirconia materials. Despite the use of different resin-based materials and bonding systems, the bond strengths remain insufficient for achieving optimal clinical performance, especially in the anterior region where esthetics and longevity are paramount.
结合技术对氧化锆牙冠模拟根管通道中核物结合强度的影响
目的:提供者经常选择通过预先存在的全覆盖修复体进行根管治疗,随后使用复合修复体修复通道腔。有效结合氧化锆的能力仍然是一个持续争论的主题。特别是在前牙区,氧化锆冠修复体强调了评估复合修复体与氧化锆冠之间结合强度的重要性。本研究的目的是评估粘接技术的选择是否能提高氧化锆冠修复根管通道的剪切粘接强度。方法:研究人员研磨了40个氧化锆圆盘,包括一个模拟的牙髓通道。光盘分为四组,由双固化和光固化树脂与两种键合体系结合。研究人员使用Instron机器进行了推出测试,并使用Fisher精确测试对结果进行了评估。结果双固化与光固化胶粘剂的剪切粘接强度差异有统计学意义,p值为0.023。虽然双固化胶粘剂组的粘接标本比光固化胶粘剂组的粘接标本多2 ~ 4倍,但其他组无统计学意义。本研究的发现强调了在复合树脂和氧化锆材料之间实现持久粘合的持续挑战。尽管使用了不同的树脂基材料和粘接系统,但粘接强度仍然不足以达到最佳的临床性能,特别是在美观和寿命至关重要的前牙区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书