Clinical trial of essential oil-based dentifrices for denture cleaning and patient satisfaction.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2026-06-01
Arthur Am E Silva, Lorena M Clemente, Adriana B Ribeiro, Viviane D C Oliveira, Ana P Macedo, Evandro Watanabe, Cláudia H Silva-Lovato
{"title":"Clinical trial of essential oil-based dentifrices for denture cleaning and patient satisfaction.","authors":"Arthur Am E Silva, Lorena M Clemente, Adriana B Ribeiro, Viviane D C Oliveira, Ana P Macedo, Evandro Watanabe, Cláudia H Silva-Lovato","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This randomized, controlled, crossover, and triple-blind clinical trial evaluated the antibiofilm action and patient acceptance of four experimental dentifrices with essential oils at 1%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n= 24) selected based on eligibility criteria were randomly assigned to five groups: a positive control (chloramine T dentifrice), Melaleuca alternifolia (Ma), Pinus strobus (Ps), Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth (BvK), or Eucalyptus citriodora (Ec). They brushed their dentures three times/day with the provided brush and dentifrice for 14 days. A 7-day washout was established between each dentifrice use. Biofilm removal (computerized method), microbial load of Candida spp., Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, Staphylococcus spp., Mutans streptococci, gram-negative bacteria, and total aerobes (colony-forming unit counting), cellular metabolism (XTT-assay), cell viability (flow cytometry), and patient satisfaction (questionnaire) were evaluated at baseline and after use of the dentifrices. Data were analyzed using Friedman's ANOVA and Cochran's Q Test for related samples (α= 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amount of biofilm (P= 0.004) and the microbial load of C. albicans (P= 0.003) were significantly lower after the use of the dentifrices compared to baseline. The dentifrices did not significantly affect cell viability (P= 0.170) or cellular metabolism (P= 0.814). No significant differences in patient acceptance were found between the experimental dentifrices and the positive control. Experimental dentifrices with 1% Melaleuca alternifolia, Pinus strobus, Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth, and Eucalyptus citriodora effectively cleaned dentures, reduced C. albicans load, and were well accepted by users.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Essential oil-based dentifrices effectively remove denture biofilm and reduce Candida albicans load, providing a natural and sustainable alternative to synthetic agents while being well accepted by users.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"39 3","pages":"110-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This randomized, controlled, crossover, and triple-blind clinical trial evaluated the antibiofilm action and patient acceptance of four experimental dentifrices with essential oils at 1%.

Methods: Participants (n= 24) selected based on eligibility criteria were randomly assigned to five groups: a positive control (chloramine T dentifrice), Melaleuca alternifolia (Ma), Pinus strobus (Ps), Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth (BvK), or Eucalyptus citriodora (Ec). They brushed their dentures three times/day with the provided brush and dentifrice for 14 days. A 7-day washout was established between each dentifrice use. Biofilm removal (computerized method), microbial load of Candida spp., Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, Staphylococcus spp., Mutans streptococci, gram-negative bacteria, and total aerobes (colony-forming unit counting), cellular metabolism (XTT-assay), cell viability (flow cytometry), and patient satisfaction (questionnaire) were evaluated at baseline and after use of the dentifrices. Data were analyzed using Friedman's ANOVA and Cochran's Q Test for related samples (α= 0.05).

Results: The amount of biofilm (P= 0.004) and the microbial load of C. albicans (P= 0.003) were significantly lower after the use of the dentifrices compared to baseline. The dentifrices did not significantly affect cell viability (P= 0.170) or cellular metabolism (P= 0.814). No significant differences in patient acceptance were found between the experimental dentifrices and the positive control. Experimental dentifrices with 1% Melaleuca alternifolia, Pinus strobus, Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth, and Eucalyptus citriodora effectively cleaned dentures, reduced C. albicans load, and were well accepted by users.

Clinical significance: Essential oil-based dentifrices effectively remove denture biofilm and reduce Candida albicans load, providing a natural and sustainable alternative to synthetic agents while being well accepted by users.

精油基牙膏用于义齿清洁的临床试验及患者满意度。
目的:这项随机、对照、交叉和三盲临床试验评估了四种含有1%精油的实验性牙膏的抗生物膜作用和患者接受度。方法:根据入选标准选择24名受试者,随机分为5组:阳性对照(氯胺T牙霜)、互花千层树(Ma)、油松(Ps)、白桦Bowdichia virgilioides Kunth (BvK)和柠檬桉树(Ec)。使用提供的牙刷和牙膏每天刷三次假牙,持续14天。在每次使用牙膏之间建立7天的洗脱期。生物膜去除(计算机方法)、念珠菌、白色念珠菌、热带念珠菌、光秃念珠菌、葡萄球菌、变形链球菌、革兰氏阴性菌的微生物负荷、总需氧菌(菌落形成单位计数)、细胞代谢(xtt测定)、细胞活力(流式细胞术)和患者满意度(问卷调查)在基线和使用牙膏后进行评估。相关样本采用Friedman’s ANOVA和Cochran’s Q检验(α= 0.05)。结果:使用后生物膜数量(P= 0.004)和白色念珠菌菌载量(P= 0.003)均显著低于基线水平。对细胞活力(P= 0.170)和细胞代谢(P= 0.814)无显著影响。实验牙组与阳性对照的患者接受度无显著差异。实验牙菌液中添加1%互花千层、油松、鲍丹、柠檬桉树等菌种,能有效清洁义齿,减少白色念珠菌负荷,用户接受度较高。临床意义:精油基牙液能有效去除义齿生物膜,减少白色念珠菌负荷,为人工合成牙剂提供了一种天然、可持续的替代品,同时为用户所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书