Integrating Intensity Scaling Into Consumer Free Listing to Describe the Sensory Attributes of Potato Chips

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Giho Kim, Hyemin Jeon, Mohammed I. Saleh, Youngseung Lee
{"title":"Integrating Intensity Scaling Into Consumer Free Listing to Describe the Sensory Attributes of Potato Chips","authors":"Giho Kim,&nbsp;Hyemin Jeon,&nbsp;Mohammed I. Saleh,&nbsp;Youngseung Lee","doi":"10.1111/joss.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to introduce a consumer-based sensory evaluation method, Free Listing with Scale (FLS), grounded in a cognitive psychology framework suggesting that analytical processing enhances the discrimination of sensory attributes. The study also sought to conduct a methodological comparison between FLS and conventional free listing (CFL). Six commercial potato chip samples were evaluated by a trained panel (<i>n</i> = 8) using descriptive analysis (DA) and by untrained consumers (<i>n</i> = 250; 125 per method) using CFL or FLS. In FLS, participants described perceived sensory attributes and rated their intensities (“weak,” “moderate,” or “strong”). Text analysis and Smith's salience index (SSI) were used to extract and quantify sensory terms. Across all samples, FLS identified 14 significant sensory attributes and showed a greater number of attributes exhibiting trends consistent with DA compared to CFL (CFL = 9; FLS = 13). SSI values and SSI-based principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that both methods produced generally comparable sensory configurations; however, FLS enhanced perceptual sensitivity, enabling the identification of more sensory attribute terms (CFL = 8; FLS = 10). Based on SSI and 1000 bootstrap iterations, 145 (CFL) and 135 (FLS) consumers were required to achieve RV = 0.95, whereas 220 (CFL) and 170 (FLS) were needed for RV = 0.99. These findings suggest that incorporating intensity scaling into free listing improves consumers' discrimination of sensory differences and yields more stable data than frequency-based approaches alone. By bridging qualitative consumer input with quantitative DA outcomes, FLS offers a time- and cost-efficient method for industrial and consumer-oriented sensory research.</p>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joss.70155","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.70155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to introduce a consumer-based sensory evaluation method, Free Listing with Scale (FLS), grounded in a cognitive psychology framework suggesting that analytical processing enhances the discrimination of sensory attributes. The study also sought to conduct a methodological comparison between FLS and conventional free listing (CFL). Six commercial potato chip samples were evaluated by a trained panel (n = 8) using descriptive analysis (DA) and by untrained consumers (n = 250; 125 per method) using CFL or FLS. In FLS, participants described perceived sensory attributes and rated their intensities (“weak,” “moderate,” or “strong”). Text analysis and Smith's salience index (SSI) were used to extract and quantify sensory terms. Across all samples, FLS identified 14 significant sensory attributes and showed a greater number of attributes exhibiting trends consistent with DA compared to CFL (CFL = 9; FLS = 13). SSI values and SSI-based principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that both methods produced generally comparable sensory configurations; however, FLS enhanced perceptual sensitivity, enabling the identification of more sensory attribute terms (CFL = 8; FLS = 10). Based on SSI and 1000 bootstrap iterations, 145 (CFL) and 135 (FLS) consumers were required to achieve RV = 0.95, whereas 220 (CFL) and 170 (FLS) were needed for RV = 0.99. These findings suggest that incorporating intensity scaling into free listing improves consumers' discrimination of sensory differences and yields more stable data than frequency-based approaches alone. By bridging qualitative consumer input with quantitative DA outcomes, FLS offers a time- and cost-efficient method for industrial and consumer-oriented sensory research.

Abstract Image

利用强度尺度法描述薯片的感官属性
本研究旨在介绍一种基于消费者的感官评价方法——自由量表(FLS),该方法基于认知心理学框架,表明分析加工增强了感官属性的辨别力。本研究还试图对FLS和传统自由上市(CFL)进行方法学比较。6个商业薯片样本由经过训练的小组(n = 8)使用描述性分析(DA)和未经训练的消费者(n = 250;每种方法125)使用CFL或FLS进行评估。在FLS中,参与者描述感知到的感官属性并评估它们的强度(“弱”、“中等”或“强”)。使用文本分析和史密斯显著性指数(SSI)提取和量化感官术语。在所有样本中,FLS识别出14个重要的感官属性,与CFL相比,FLS显示出更多与DA一致的属性(CFL = 9; FLS = 13)。SSI值和基于SSI的主成分分析(PCA)表明,两种方法产生的感官配置大致相当;然而,FLS增强了感知敏感性,使识别更多的感官属性项(CFL = 8; FLS = 10)。基于SSI和1000次引导迭代,实现RV = 0.95需要145 (CFL)和135 (FLS)消费者,而实现RV = 0.99需要220 (CFL)和170 (FLS)消费者。这些发现表明,将强度尺度纳入免费列表可以提高消费者对感官差异的辨别能力,并且比单独基于频率的方法产生更稳定的数据。通过连接定性消费者输入与定量数据分析结果,FLS为工业和面向消费者的感官研究提供了一种时间和成本效益高的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sensory Studies
Journal of Sensory Studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书