Giho Kim, Hyemin Jeon, Mohammed I. Saleh, Youngseung Lee
{"title":"Integrating Intensity Scaling Into Consumer Free Listing to Describe the Sensory Attributes of Potato Chips","authors":"Giho Kim, Hyemin Jeon, Mohammed I. Saleh, Youngseung Lee","doi":"10.1111/joss.70155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to introduce a consumer-based sensory evaluation method, Free Listing with Scale (FLS), grounded in a cognitive psychology framework suggesting that analytical processing enhances the discrimination of sensory attributes. The study also sought to conduct a methodological comparison between FLS and conventional free listing (CFL). Six commercial potato chip samples were evaluated by a trained panel (<i>n</i> = 8) using descriptive analysis (DA) and by untrained consumers (<i>n</i> = 250; 125 per method) using CFL or FLS. In FLS, participants described perceived sensory attributes and rated their intensities (“weak,” “moderate,” or “strong”). Text analysis and Smith's salience index (SSI) were used to extract and quantify sensory terms. Across all samples, FLS identified 14 significant sensory attributes and showed a greater number of attributes exhibiting trends consistent with DA compared to CFL (CFL = 9; FLS = 13). SSI values and SSI-based principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that both methods produced generally comparable sensory configurations; however, FLS enhanced perceptual sensitivity, enabling the identification of more sensory attribute terms (CFL = 8; FLS = 10). Based on SSI and 1000 bootstrap iterations, 145 (CFL) and 135 (FLS) consumers were required to achieve RV = 0.95, whereas 220 (CFL) and 170 (FLS) were needed for RV = 0.99. These findings suggest that incorporating intensity scaling into free listing improves consumers' discrimination of sensory differences and yields more stable data than frequency-based approaches alone. By bridging qualitative consumer input with quantitative DA outcomes, FLS offers a time- and cost-efficient method for industrial and consumer-oriented sensory research.</p>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joss.70155","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.70155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to introduce a consumer-based sensory evaluation method, Free Listing with Scale (FLS), grounded in a cognitive psychology framework suggesting that analytical processing enhances the discrimination of sensory attributes. The study also sought to conduct a methodological comparison between FLS and conventional free listing (CFL). Six commercial potato chip samples were evaluated by a trained panel (n = 8) using descriptive analysis (DA) and by untrained consumers (n = 250; 125 per method) using CFL or FLS. In FLS, participants described perceived sensory attributes and rated their intensities (“weak,” “moderate,” or “strong”). Text analysis and Smith's salience index (SSI) were used to extract and quantify sensory terms. Across all samples, FLS identified 14 significant sensory attributes and showed a greater number of attributes exhibiting trends consistent with DA compared to CFL (CFL = 9; FLS = 13). SSI values and SSI-based principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that both methods produced generally comparable sensory configurations; however, FLS enhanced perceptual sensitivity, enabling the identification of more sensory attribute terms (CFL = 8; FLS = 10). Based on SSI and 1000 bootstrap iterations, 145 (CFL) and 135 (FLS) consumers were required to achieve RV = 0.95, whereas 220 (CFL) and 170 (FLS) were needed for RV = 0.99. These findings suggest that incorporating intensity scaling into free listing improves consumers' discrimination of sensory differences and yields more stable data than frequency-based approaches alone. By bridging qualitative consumer input with quantitative DA outcomes, FLS offers a time- and cost-efficient method for industrial and consumer-oriented sensory research.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.