Prahan Chetlur , Daniel Marino , John M. DeWitt , Patrick Joseph Magahis , SriHari Mahadev , Reem Sharaiha , John Lee , Jason Samarasena , Amirali Tavangar , Frances Dang , Stefano Francesco Crinò , Kavel Visrodia , Amrita Sethi , John Doyle , Nirav Thosani , Gregory Haber , Lauren Khanna , Tamas Gonda
{"title":"Endoscopic Ultrasound–Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors","authors":"Prahan Chetlur , Daniel Marino , John M. DeWitt , Patrick Joseph Magahis , SriHari Mahadev , Reem Sharaiha , John Lee , Jason Samarasena , Amirali Tavangar , Frances Dang , Stefano Francesco Crinò , Kavel Visrodia , Amrita Sethi , John Doyle , Nirav Thosani , Gregory Haber , Lauren Khanna , Tamas Gonda","doi":"10.1016/j.tige.2026.250971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS</h3><div>Endoscopic ultrasound–guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment option for nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and predictors of response to EUS-RFA.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective, multicenter case series across 7 tertiary care centers, including 46 patients with biopsy-proven NF-PanNETs. Demographic, tumor, and procedural data were collected. Technical success was defined as completion of at least 1 radiofrequency ablation (RFA) application. Radiographic response was assessed at ≥10 weeks and ≥3 months using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors: complete response (CR, 100% reduction), partial response (PR, 30–99%), and no response (NR, <30%). Predictive factors were evaluated using logistic regression. Adverse events were classified per AGREE (Adverse events in GastrRointEstinal Endoscopy) criteria. This study was exempt from institutional review board review after assessment.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Among 46 patients (mean age, 60.9 years; 53% men), most tumors (93.6%) were well-differentiated grade 1, with a mean size of 12.7 mm. Technical success was 100%, with a mean of 2.9 RFA applications. At initial follow-up, CR was achieved in 32.6%, PR in 47.8%, and NR in 19.6%. Of patients with PR/NR (<em>n</em> = 31), 58.1% underwent repeat RFA. At final follow-up (mean, 15.7 months), cumulative response rates were as follows: CR, 60.0%; PR, 31.1%; and NR, 8.9%. Longer probe tips (odds ratio, 5.31; 95% CI, 1.10-33.87) and more RFA applications (odds ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.19-3.9) predicted CR. Adverse events occurred in 15.2% (<em>n</em> = 7), including mild abdominal pain, mild pancreatitis, and 1 grade III bleed.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>EUS-RFA for NF-PanNETs demonstrates high technical success, durable tumor response, and an acceptable safety profile. Probe length and application number may influence outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36169,"journal":{"name":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"28 3","pages":"Article 250971"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques and Innovations in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590030726000061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS
Endoscopic ultrasound–guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment option for nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and predictors of response to EUS-RFA.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective, multicenter case series across 7 tertiary care centers, including 46 patients with biopsy-proven NF-PanNETs. Demographic, tumor, and procedural data were collected. Technical success was defined as completion of at least 1 radiofrequency ablation (RFA) application. Radiographic response was assessed at ≥10 weeks and ≥3 months using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors: complete response (CR, 100% reduction), partial response (PR, 30–99%), and no response (NR, <30%). Predictive factors were evaluated using logistic regression. Adverse events were classified per AGREE (Adverse events in GastrRointEstinal Endoscopy) criteria. This study was exempt from institutional review board review after assessment.
RESULTS
Among 46 patients (mean age, 60.9 years; 53% men), most tumors (93.6%) were well-differentiated grade 1, with a mean size of 12.7 mm. Technical success was 100%, with a mean of 2.9 RFA applications. At initial follow-up, CR was achieved in 32.6%, PR in 47.8%, and NR in 19.6%. Of patients with PR/NR (n = 31), 58.1% underwent repeat RFA. At final follow-up (mean, 15.7 months), cumulative response rates were as follows: CR, 60.0%; PR, 31.1%; and NR, 8.9%. Longer probe tips (odds ratio, 5.31; 95% CI, 1.10-33.87) and more RFA applications (odds ratio, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.19-3.9) predicted CR. Adverse events occurred in 15.2% (n = 7), including mild abdominal pain, mild pancreatitis, and 1 grade III bleed.
CONCLUSION
EUS-RFA for NF-PanNETs demonstrates high technical success, durable tumor response, and an acceptable safety profile. Probe length and application number may influence outcomes.