Contouring and dose extraction of the maxilla, mandible and teeth on head and neck cancer radiotherapy planning scans

IF 2
EJC paediatric oncology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ejcped.2026.100523
Emma C. Foster-Thomas , Koen B. Krommenhoek , Shermaine Pan , Craig W. Barclay , Angela Davey , Lucy S.C. Davies , Peter Sitch , SMILE Consortium , Thomas Melichar , Marinka L.F. Hol , Marianne Aznar
{"title":"Contouring and dose extraction of the maxilla, mandible and teeth on head and neck cancer radiotherapy planning scans","authors":"Emma C. Foster-Thomas ,&nbsp;Koen B. Krommenhoek ,&nbsp;Shermaine Pan ,&nbsp;Craig W. Barclay ,&nbsp;Angela Davey ,&nbsp;Lucy S.C. Davies ,&nbsp;Peter Sitch ,&nbsp;SMILE Consortium ,&nbsp;Thomas Melichar ,&nbsp;Marinka L.F. Hol ,&nbsp;Marianne Aznar","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcped.2026.100523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><div>Despite their vulnerability to radiation-induced damage, the maxilla and dentition are not routinely contoured in head and neck (HN) radiotherapy (RT), preventing accurate dose assessment and establishment of dose-effect relationships. This literature review aimed to: (1) identify published dentofacial contouring approaches, (2) synthesise current methods, and (3) where feasible, compare practices in paediatric and adult RT.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>MEDLINE and Embase were searched for studies that contoured the maxilla, mandible, or teeth in HN RT. Reference lists were manually screened.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-one (2003–2025) papers met inclusion criteria. Manual contouring predominated (77.4%), with substantial heterogeneity across all structures. Only seven studies (22.6%) contoured the maxilla. Tooth contouring varied from individual segmentation to variable groupings. Eight studies (25.8%) reported dental professional involvement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dentofacial contouring lacks standardisation and predominantly relies on manual techniques. This variability impedes dose assessment and cross-study comparisons. Standardised international guidelines for the contouring of the maxilla, mandible and teeth are necessary to ensure uniformity and enable comparability between studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94314,"journal":{"name":"EJC paediatric oncology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJC paediatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X26000425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose

Despite their vulnerability to radiation-induced damage, the maxilla and dentition are not routinely contoured in head and neck (HN) radiotherapy (RT), preventing accurate dose assessment and establishment of dose-effect relationships. This literature review aimed to: (1) identify published dentofacial contouring approaches, (2) synthesise current methods, and (3) where feasible, compare practices in paediatric and adult RT.

Materials and Methods

MEDLINE and Embase were searched for studies that contoured the maxilla, mandible, or teeth in HN RT. Reference lists were manually screened.

Results

Thirty-one (2003–2025) papers met inclusion criteria. Manual contouring predominated (77.4%), with substantial heterogeneity across all structures. Only seven studies (22.6%) contoured the maxilla. Tooth contouring varied from individual segmentation to variable groupings. Eight studies (25.8%) reported dental professional involvement.

Conclusion

Dentofacial contouring lacks standardisation and predominantly relies on manual techniques. This variability impedes dose assessment and cross-study comparisons. Standardised international guidelines for the contouring of the maxilla, mandible and teeth are necessary to ensure uniformity and enable comparability between studies.
上颌、下颌骨及牙齿在头颈部肿瘤放疗计划扫描中的轮廓及剂量提取
背景与目的尽管上颌和牙列容易受到辐射引起的损伤,但在头颈部放射治疗(RT)中,上颌和牙列没有常规轮廓,这妨碍了准确的剂量评估和剂量效应关系的建立。本文献综述旨在:(1)识别已发表的牙面轮廓化方法,(2)综合当前的方法,(3)在可行的情况下,比较儿科和成人rt的实践。材料和方法medline和Embase检索了在HN rt中对上颌、下颌骨或牙齿进行轮廓化的研究。结果31篇(2003-2025)论文符合纳入标准。手工轮廓占主导地位(77.4%),在所有结构中具有实质性的异质性。只有7项研究(22.6%)绘制了上颌骨轮廓。牙齿轮廓从单个分割到可变分组各不相同。8项研究(25.8%)报告了牙科专业人员的介入。结论牙面轮廓缺乏标准化,主要依靠手工技术。这种可变性阻碍了剂量评估和交叉研究比较。为了确保研究的一致性和可比性,有必要制定关于上颌骨、下颌骨和牙齿轮廓的标准化国际指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书