Current pattern of care in brain and near-brain tumor radiotherapy for infants and young children: A survey on age restrictions, treatment conditions and decision-making within SIOP Europe
{"title":"Current pattern of care in brain and near-brain tumor radiotherapy for infants and young children: A survey on age restrictions, treatment conditions and decision-making within SIOP Europe","authors":"Kristina Gaus , Petter Brandal , Martina Stickan-Verfürth , Heike Thomas , Stefanie Schulze Schleithoff , Rolf-Dieter Kortmann , Yasmin Lassen-Ramshad , Thankamma Ajithkumar , Geert O. Janssens , Henriette Magelssen , Beate Timmermann","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcped.2026.100521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Radiotherapy (RT) in children under 36 months of age with brain and near-brain tumors remains clinically challenging and harmonized age-related recommendations across Europe are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate current RT practice patterns and age-related decision-making in this population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A web-based survey among members of the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) assessed institutional experience, lower age limits for RT, technical and disease-related determinants, protocol adherence and follow-up practices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-two professionals from 23 countries participated. All participants reported treating children under 36 months with RT, although only 58% irradiated children under 18 months and 27% under 12 months. Eighty-two percent worked in centers to which young children were referred and advanced RT techniques were widely available (90%). While international study protocols were commonly applied, only 52% reported having institutional standards for dose and volume constraints differing from those for older children. Lower age limits for general RT were reported by 56% of participants and typically ranged between 12 and 36 months. Craniospinal irradiation was avoided by 87% of these respondents in children under 36 months. Preserving cognitive function was the most important factor in age-related decisions (98%), followed by healthy development (75%). Treatment decisions were predominantly multidisciplinary (98%). Parental involvement required greater attention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>RT in children under 36 months is applied cautiously and heterogeneously across Europe. Individual decisions are driven by anticipated toxicities, technical feasibility and disease-related prognosis. Harmonized age-specific RT guidelines and improved long-term follow-up structures are needed to ensure safe and evidence-based care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94314,"journal":{"name":"EJC paediatric oncology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100521"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJC paediatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X26000401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Radiotherapy (RT) in children under 36 months of age with brain and near-brain tumors remains clinically challenging and harmonized age-related recommendations across Europe are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate current RT practice patterns and age-related decision-making in this population.
Methods
A web-based survey among members of the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) assessed institutional experience, lower age limits for RT, technical and disease-related determinants, protocol adherence and follow-up practices.
Results
Fifty-two professionals from 23 countries participated. All participants reported treating children under 36 months with RT, although only 58% irradiated children under 18 months and 27% under 12 months. Eighty-two percent worked in centers to which young children were referred and advanced RT techniques were widely available (90%). While international study protocols were commonly applied, only 52% reported having institutional standards for dose and volume constraints differing from those for older children. Lower age limits for general RT were reported by 56% of participants and typically ranged between 12 and 36 months. Craniospinal irradiation was avoided by 87% of these respondents in children under 36 months. Preserving cognitive function was the most important factor in age-related decisions (98%), followed by healthy development (75%). Treatment decisions were predominantly multidisciplinary (98%). Parental involvement required greater attention.
Conclusion
RT in children under 36 months is applied cautiously and heterogeneously across Europe. Individual decisions are driven by anticipated toxicities, technical feasibility and disease-related prognosis. Harmonized age-specific RT guidelines and improved long-term follow-up structures are needed to ensure safe and evidence-based care.