Chris Harding, Ridhi Agarwal, Janine Bates, Alison Bray, Sarah Milosevic, Emma Thomas-Jones, Michael Drinnan, Marcus Drake, Peter Michell, Bethan Pell, Haroon Ahmed, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Tom Schatzberger, Jane Davies, Kerenza Hood, Yemisi Takwoingi, Adrian Edwards
{"title":"Diagnostic models for male lower urinary tract symptom management in primary care: a prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy study.","authors":"Chris Harding, Ridhi Agarwal, Janine Bates, Alison Bray, Sarah Milosevic, Emma Thomas-Jones, Michael Drinnan, Marcus Drake, Peter Michell, Bethan Pell, Haroon Ahmed, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Tom Schatzberger, Jane Davies, Kerenza Hood, Yemisi Takwoingi, Adrian Edwards","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2025.0513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent research has concluded that primary care assessment and management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) requires practical resources.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and independently validate risk-prediction models for three common urological conditions based on a combination of simple, minimally invasive index tests in men with LUTS presenting to primary care.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy study with independent development and validation cohorts set in 67 general practices in England and Wales.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 601 men presenting to primary care with LUTS, 350 in the development cohort and 251 in the validation cohort, underwent index tests - validated symptom assessment, bladder diary, physical examination, serum prostate specific antigen, uroflowmetry, and post-void residual volume estimation. Invasive urodynamic studies provided a diagnostic reference standard. Risk-prediction models for urodynamic diagnoses were developed and then validated in independent cohorts. Discriminative and calibration performance of the risk-prediction models for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), detrusor underactivity (DU), and detrusor overactivity (DO) using the c-index, calibration slope and plot, and sensitivity and specificity of the models was undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BOO model from the development cohort demonstrated good discriminative performance (optimism-corrected c-index of 0.80). The models derived from the development cohort for DU and DO demonstrated moderate discriminative ability (optimism-corrected c-indices of 0.64 and 0.67, respectively). Similar estimates of c-index were observed for each model within the independent validation cohort (BOO, 0.82; DU, 0.63; and DO, 0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a combination of simple, non-invasive index tests can accurately predict common urological diagnoses in men with LUTS, potentially facilitating earlier initiation of evidence-based treatments and improved management in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":"e859-e867"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13659081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2025.0513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recent research has concluded that primary care assessment and management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) requires practical resources.
Aim: To develop and independently validate risk-prediction models for three common urological conditions based on a combination of simple, minimally invasive index tests in men with LUTS presenting to primary care.
Design and setting: A prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy study with independent development and validation cohorts set in 67 general practices in England and Wales.
Method: A total of 601 men presenting to primary care with LUTS, 350 in the development cohort and 251 in the validation cohort, underwent index tests - validated symptom assessment, bladder diary, physical examination, serum prostate specific antigen, uroflowmetry, and post-void residual volume estimation. Invasive urodynamic studies provided a diagnostic reference standard. Risk-prediction models for urodynamic diagnoses were developed and then validated in independent cohorts. Discriminative and calibration performance of the risk-prediction models for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), detrusor underactivity (DU), and detrusor overactivity (DO) using the c-index, calibration slope and plot, and sensitivity and specificity of the models was undertaken.
Results: The BOO model from the development cohort demonstrated good discriminative performance (optimism-corrected c-index of 0.80). The models derived from the development cohort for DU and DO demonstrated moderate discriminative ability (optimism-corrected c-indices of 0.64 and 0.67, respectively). Similar estimates of c-index were observed for each model within the independent validation cohort (BOO, 0.82; DU, 0.63; and DO, 0.62).
Conclusion: Using a combination of simple, non-invasive index tests can accurately predict common urological diagnoses in men with LUTS, potentially facilitating earlier initiation of evidence-based treatments and improved management in primary care.
目的:开发并独立验证三种常见泌尿系统疾病的风险预测模型,该模型基于对就诊于初级保健的有下尿路症状(LUTS)的男性进行简单、微创指数试验的组合。设计:一项前瞻性、多中心、诊断准确性的独立开发和验证队列研究。背景-英格兰和威尔士的67种一般做法。参与者:601名因LUTS就诊的男性:发展组350名,验证组251名。干预措施-指数测试-验证症状评估、膀胱日记、体格检查、血清前列腺特异性抗原、尿流量测定和尿后残留体积估计。有创性尿动力学研究提供了诊断参考标准。建立风险预测模型并在独立队列中进行验证。主要结果测量-使用c指数、校准斜率和图以及模型的敏感性和特异性诊断膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)、逼尿肌活动不足(DU)和逼尿肌过度活动(DO)的风险预测模型的判别和校准性能。结果-来自发展队列的BOO模型表现出良好的判别性能(乐观校正的c指数为0.80)。来自发展队列的DU和DO模型表现出中等的判别能力(乐观校正的c指数分别为0.64和0.67)。在独立验证队列中,每个模型的c-index估计相似(BOO=0.82, DU= 0.63, DO =0.62)。结论:结合使用简单、无创的指标测试可以准确预测LUTS男性常见的泌尿系统诊断,有可能促进早期开始循证治疗并改善初级保健管理。