Beyond BRCA: Genetic testing for gynaecological cancers in South Africa.

IF 1.2
S Barnard, B Rossouw, E Gilfillan
{"title":"Beyond BRCA: Genetic testing for gynaecological cancers in South Africa.","authors":"S Barnard, B Rossouw, E Gilfillan","doi":"10.7196/SAMJ.2026.v116i2.3514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hereditary cancer syndromes, caused by pathogenic variants in specific genes, substantially increase an individual's risk for cancer, and are estimated to cause 10% of all uterine cancers and 20% of all ovarian cancers. However, these data are primarily based on high-income countries, and to date there are no published data on the known pathogenic variants or testing of cancer predisposition genes associated with gynaecological cancers in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the uptake and type of molecular testing performed on patients with a suspected hereditary cancer syndrome associated with gynaecological cancer, and to assess whether patient characteristics impacted the detection of pathogenic variants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective file review was performed for patients with a confirmed diagnosis or family history of gynaecological cancer, seen by a single clinical genetics centre in Johannesburg between 2003 and 2023. Demographic information, family history and medical information were recorded and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 104 records were included in analysis. The majority (73/104, 70.2%) of patients were seen in the private healthcare system, of whom most (41%) were of European ancestry. Of the remaining 31 public healthcare patients, the majority were of indigenous African ancestry (42%). Most (78/104, 75.0%) underwent diagnostic genetic testing. Of these, 25 (32.1%) were positive for pathogenic variants, 41 (52.6%) were negative and 12 (15.4%) returned a variant of unknown significance. Test results were significantly different between patients of European and non-European ancestry (p<0.05), with those of non-European ancestry 30% less likely to have a pathogenic variant detected (odds ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.22 - 2.21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A disparity exists not only in genetic testing availability but also clinic attendance between the public and private healthcare systems, which likely limits the ability to diagnose hereditary cancer syndromes associated with gynaecological cancers in public healthcare hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":520778,"journal":{"name":"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde","volume":"116 2","pages":"e3514"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2026.v116i2.3514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hereditary cancer syndromes, caused by pathogenic variants in specific genes, substantially increase an individual's risk for cancer, and are estimated to cause 10% of all uterine cancers and 20% of all ovarian cancers. However, these data are primarily based on high-income countries, and to date there are no published data on the known pathogenic variants or testing of cancer predisposition genes associated with gynaecological cancers in South Africa.

Objectives: To investigate the uptake and type of molecular testing performed on patients with a suspected hereditary cancer syndrome associated with gynaecological cancer, and to assess whether patient characteristics impacted the detection of pathogenic variants.

Methods: A retrospective file review was performed for patients with a confirmed diagnosis or family history of gynaecological cancer, seen by a single clinical genetics centre in Johannesburg between 2003 and 2023. Demographic information, family history and medical information were recorded and analysed.

Results: A total of 104 records were included in analysis. The majority (73/104, 70.2%) of patients were seen in the private healthcare system, of whom most (41%) were of European ancestry. Of the remaining 31 public healthcare patients, the majority were of indigenous African ancestry (42%). Most (78/104, 75.0%) underwent diagnostic genetic testing. Of these, 25 (32.1%) were positive for pathogenic variants, 41 (52.6%) were negative and 12 (15.4%) returned a variant of unknown significance. Test results were significantly different between patients of European and non-European ancestry (p<0.05), with those of non-European ancestry 30% less likely to have a pathogenic variant detected (odds ratio 0.7, 95% confidence interval 0.22 - 2.21).

Conclusion: A disparity exists not only in genetic testing availability but also clinic attendance between the public and private healthcare systems, which likely limits the ability to diagnose hereditary cancer syndromes associated with gynaecological cancers in public healthcare hospitals.

超越BRCA:南非妇科癌症的基因检测。
背景:由特定基因的致病变异引起的遗传性癌症综合征,大大增加了个体患癌症的风险,据估计,10%的子宫癌和20%的卵巢癌是由遗传性癌症综合征引起的。然而,这些数据主要是基于高收入国家,迄今为止还没有关于南非与妇科癌症相关的已知致病变异或癌症易感基因检测的公开数据。目的:研究对疑似遗传性癌症综合征的妇科癌症患者进行分子检测的情况和类型,并评估患者特征是否影响致病变异的检测。方法:对2003年至2023年在约翰内斯堡一家临床遗传学中心就诊的确诊或有妇科癌症家族史的患者进行回顾性档案审查。记录和分析人口统计信息、家族史和医疗信息。结果:共纳入104例病例分析。大多数(73/104,70.2%)患者就诊于私人医疗保健系统,其中大多数(41%)为欧洲血统。在其余31名公共保健患者中,大多数是非洲土著血统(42%)。大多数(78/104,75.0%)接受了诊断性基因检测。其中,25例(32.1%)的致病变异呈阳性,41例(52.6%)为阴性,12例(15.4%)返回了意义不明的变异。欧洲和非欧洲血统患者的检测结果存在显著差异(结论:不仅在基因检测的可用性上存在差异,而且在公立和私立医疗保健系统之间的诊所就诊人数也存在差异,这可能限制了公立医疗保健医院诊断与妇科癌症相关的遗传性癌症综合征的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书