Early Online.

IF 1.2
S Mahomed, M V Ncube, A Dhai, W Janneker, M Nodikida
{"title":"Early Online.","authors":"S Mahomed, M V Ncube, A Dhai, W Janneker, M Nodikida","doi":"10.7196/SAMJ.2026.v116i5.5072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping clinical practice, and has prompted the Health Professions Council of South Africa to publish Booklet 20 - its first ethical framework for AI use in healthcare. This review critically evaluates Booklet 20 through the lens of the South African Medical Association AI Task Team, examining its alignment with national legislation, emerging regulatory mechanisms, broader policy commitments and the ethico-social context. Drawing on the Protection of Personal Information Act, the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority's 2025 guidance for AI‑enabled medical devices, the National AI Policy Framework and the 2024 National Health Research Ethics Council ethics guidelines, the analysis identifies key operational gaps relating to human oversight, disclosure, data sovereignty, equity, accountability and risk categorisation. The article argues that while Booklet 20 establishes an important foundation, its principles require concrete implementation tools, including risk‑tiered safeguards, structured consent templates, meaningful governance co-ordination and context‑appropriate standards for transparency, explainability and bias mitigation. Grounding these enhancements in South Africa's communitarian ethic of ubuntu highlights the need for relational accountability, fairness and community participation to ensure safe and equitable AI integration. The article concludes with a set of practical recommendations aimed at strengthening ethical governance and supporting patient trust and professional integrity as AI becomes embedded in clinical workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":520778,"journal":{"name":"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde","volume":"116 5","pages":"e5072"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2026.v116i5.5072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping clinical practice, and has prompted the Health Professions Council of South Africa to publish Booklet 20 - its first ethical framework for AI use in healthcare. This review critically evaluates Booklet 20 through the lens of the South African Medical Association AI Task Team, examining its alignment with national legislation, emerging regulatory mechanisms, broader policy commitments and the ethico-social context. Drawing on the Protection of Personal Information Act, the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority's 2025 guidance for AI‑enabled medical devices, the National AI Policy Framework and the 2024 National Health Research Ethics Council ethics guidelines, the analysis identifies key operational gaps relating to human oversight, disclosure, data sovereignty, equity, accountability and risk categorisation. The article argues that while Booklet 20 establishes an important foundation, its principles require concrete implementation tools, including risk‑tiered safeguards, structured consent templates, meaningful governance co-ordination and context‑appropriate standards for transparency, explainability and bias mitigation. Grounding these enhancements in South Africa's communitarian ethic of ubuntu highlights the need for relational accountability, fairness and community participation to ensure safe and equitable AI integration. The article concludes with a set of practical recommendations aimed at strengthening ethical governance and supporting patient trust and professional integrity as AI becomes embedded in clinical workflows.

早期的网络。
人工智能(AI)正在迅速重塑临床实践,并促使南非卫生专业委员会发布了小册子 20,这是其在医疗保健中使用人工智能的第一个道德框架。本次审查通过南非医学协会人工智能任务小组的视角,严格评估小册子 20,审查其与国家立法、新出现的监管机制、更广泛的政策承诺和伦理社会背景的一致性。根据《个人信息保护法》、《南非卫生产品监管局2025年人工智能医疗设备指南》、《国家人工智能政策框架》和《2024年国家卫生研究伦理委员会道德准则》,该分析确定了与人类监督、披露、数据主权、公平、问责制和风险分类有关的关键运营差距。文章认为,虽然小册子 20建立了一个重要的基础,但其原则需要具体的实施工具,包括风险分层保障、结构化同意模板、有意义的治理协调和适合具体情况的透明度、可解释性和减少偏见标准。将这些改进建立在南非的ubuntu社区伦理基础上,强调了关系问责制、公平和社区参与的必要性,以确保安全和公平的人工智能整合。文章最后提出了一系列实用建议,旨在随着人工智能嵌入临床工作流程,加强道德治理,支持患者信任和专业诚信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书