[Determination of seven tire antioxidants and their quinone oxidation products in fine particulate matter by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].

Feng Liu, Bin-Bin Tang, Li-Yuan Wu, Li-Xin Song, Min Zhang, Min He
{"title":"[Determination of seven tire antioxidants and their quinone oxidation products in fine particulate matter by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].","authors":"Feng Liu, Bin-Bin Tang, Li-Yuan Wu, Li-Xin Song, Min Zhang, Min He","doi":"10.3724/SP.J.1123.2025.09023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>p</i>-Phenylenediamine compounds (PPDs) are widely used as anti-aging agents and antioxidants in rubber industry. However, environmental concerns have arisen regarding the toxicity of their quinone derivatives (PPD-Qs). Fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) serves as a crucial vector enabling PPDs and PPD-Qs to enter the human body via respiratory exposure pathway. Therefore, accurate monitoring of PPDs and PPD-Qs in PM<sub>2.5</sub> is essential. In this research, a high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) approach was established to quantify seven PPDs and seven PPD-Qs in PM<sub>2.5</sub>. Samples were collected on quartz fiber filters with a diameter of 90 mm. The filter was cut into strips and subsequently spiked with 2 ng of 6PPD-d<sub>5</sub> and 6PPD-Q-d<sub>5</sub> internal standards. The target compounds were extracted with 10 mL of acetonitrile containing 1% (volume fraction) ammonia solution and 20 μmol/L glutathione (GSH), and purified via a modified QuEChERS pretreatment method. Specifically, after salting out with 0.5 g of NaCl and 1.0 g of MgSO<sub>4</sub>, the supernatant was subjected to dispersive solid-phase extraction for cleanup. In this process, 0.5 g of MgSO<sub>4</sub>, 100 mg of octadecylsilane (C<sub>18</sub>), and 100 mg of <i>N</i>-propylethylenediamine (PSA) were employed as sorbents. Subsequently, 5 mL of the cleaned-up supernatant was evaporated to near dryness and then redissolved in 0.2 mL of a methanol-water mixture (1∶1, volume ratio) for instrumental determination. The compounds were separated on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T<sub>3</sub> column(100 mm×2.1 mm,1.8 μm) with mobile phases consisting of a 5 mmol/L ammonium formate aqueous solution containing 0.1% formic acid and methanol. Identification and quantification of the compounds were carried out under positive electrospray ionization in multiple reaction monitoring mode. The results indicated that all analytes exhibited good linear relationships within the range of 0.05-20.0 ng/mL, with correlation coefficients (<i>r</i>) exceeding 0.999. The method detection limits (MDLs) and method quantification limits (MQLs) of the compounds were within the ranges of 0.003-0.07 pg/m<sup>3</sup> and 0.01-0.2 pg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. At three spiked levels of low, medium and high, the recoveries of the compounds were in the range of 66.3% to 119.0% , and the relative standard deviations (RSDs) ranged from 1.5% to 13.2% (<i>n</i>=6). Ultimately, the developed method was employed for the analysis of PPDs and PPD-Qs in PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples collected from Baotou during January and February 2025. The results indicated that seven PPDs and five PPD-Qs were detected, with mass concentrations ranging from 2.26 to 251.2 pg/m<sup>3</sup> and 2.36 to 105.4 pg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. The proposed method is characterized by its simplicity, environmental friendliness and accuracy, making it suitable for the rapid quantitative analysis of PPDs and PPD-Qs in PM<sub>2.5</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":101336,"journal":{"name":"Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography","volume":"44 6","pages":"658-666"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13237625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2025.09023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

p-Phenylenediamine compounds (PPDs) are widely used as anti-aging agents and antioxidants in rubber industry. However, environmental concerns have arisen regarding the toxicity of their quinone derivatives (PPD-Qs). Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) serves as a crucial vector enabling PPDs and PPD-Qs to enter the human body via respiratory exposure pathway. Therefore, accurate monitoring of PPDs and PPD-Qs in PM2.5 is essential. In this research, a high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) approach was established to quantify seven PPDs and seven PPD-Qs in PM2.5. Samples were collected on quartz fiber filters with a diameter of 90 mm. The filter was cut into strips and subsequently spiked with 2 ng of 6PPD-d5 and 6PPD-Q-d5 internal standards. The target compounds were extracted with 10 mL of acetonitrile containing 1% (volume fraction) ammonia solution and 20 μmol/L glutathione (GSH), and purified via a modified QuEChERS pretreatment method. Specifically, after salting out with 0.5 g of NaCl and 1.0 g of MgSO4, the supernatant was subjected to dispersive solid-phase extraction for cleanup. In this process, 0.5 g of MgSO4, 100 mg of octadecylsilane (C18), and 100 mg of N-propylethylenediamine (PSA) were employed as sorbents. Subsequently, 5 mL of the cleaned-up supernatant was evaporated to near dryness and then redissolved in 0.2 mL of a methanol-water mixture (1∶1, volume ratio) for instrumental determination. The compounds were separated on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column(100 mm×2.1 mm,1.8 μm) with mobile phases consisting of a 5 mmol/L ammonium formate aqueous solution containing 0.1% formic acid and methanol. Identification and quantification of the compounds were carried out under positive electrospray ionization in multiple reaction monitoring mode. The results indicated that all analytes exhibited good linear relationships within the range of 0.05-20.0 ng/mL, with correlation coefficients (r) exceeding 0.999. The method detection limits (MDLs) and method quantification limits (MQLs) of the compounds were within the ranges of 0.003-0.07 pg/m3 and 0.01-0.2 pg/m3, respectively. At three spiked levels of low, medium and high, the recoveries of the compounds were in the range of 66.3% to 119.0% , and the relative standard deviations (RSDs) ranged from 1.5% to 13.2% (n=6). Ultimately, the developed method was employed for the analysis of PPDs and PPD-Qs in PM2.5 samples collected from Baotou during January and February 2025. The results indicated that seven PPDs and five PPD-Qs were detected, with mass concentrations ranging from 2.26 to 251.2 pg/m3 and 2.36 to 105.4 pg/m3, respectively. The proposed method is characterized by its simplicity, environmental friendliness and accuracy, making it suitable for the rapid quantitative analysis of PPDs and PPD-Qs in PM2.5.

[高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定细颗粒物中七种轮胎抗氧化剂及其醌类氧化产物]。
对苯二胺类化合物是橡胶工业中广泛应用的抗老化剂和抗氧化剂。然而,由于其醌衍生物(PPD-Qs)的毒性,环境问题已引起关注。细颗粒物(PM2.5)是PPDs和PPD-Qs通过呼吸暴露途径进入人体的重要载体。因此,准确监测PM2.5中的PPDs和PPD-Qs至关重要。本研究建立了高效液相色谱-串联质谱(HPLC-MS/MS)定量PM2.5中7种ppd和7种PPD-Qs的方法。样品在直径为90 mm的石英纤维过滤器上采集。将过滤器切成条状,随后加入2ng 6PPD-d5和6PPD-Q-d5内标。用含1%(体积分数)氨溶液和20 μmol/L谷胱甘肽(GSH)的乙腈10 mL提取目标化合物,采用改进的QuEChERS预处理方法纯化。用0.5 g NaCl和1.0 g MgSO4盐析出上清液后,进行分散固相萃取净化。以0.5 g MgSO4、100 mg十八烷基硅烷(C18)和100 mg n -丙二胺(PSA)为吸附剂。将清洗后的上清液5ml蒸发至近干,再溶解于0.2 mL甲醇-水混合物(体积比为1∶1)中测定。采用Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3色谱柱(100 mm×2.1 mm,1.8 μm)分离,流动相为5 mmol/L甲酸铵水溶液(含0.1%甲酸和甲醇)。在多反应监测模式下,在正电喷雾电离下对化合物进行鉴定和定量。结果表明,各分析物在0.05 ~ 20.0 ng/mL范围内呈良好的线性关系,相关系数(r)均大于0.999。化合物的方法检出限和定量限分别在0.003 ~ 0.07 pg/m3和0.01 ~ 0.2 pg/m3范围内。在低、中、高3个加标水平下,加标回收率为66.3% ~ 119.0%,相对标准偏差(rsd)为1.5% ~ 13.2% (n=6)。最后,将该方法应用于2025年1 - 2月包头市PM2.5样本中PPDs和PPD-Qs的分析。结果表明,共检测到7种ppd和5种PPD-Qs,质量浓度范围分别为2.26 ~ 251.2 pg/m3和2.36 ~ 105.4 pg/m3。该方法简便、环保、准确,适用于PM2.5中PPDs和PPD-Qs的快速定量分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书