Cross-Sectional Study on the Relationship Between Jawbone Types and Trabecular Bone Structures.

IF 1.3
Honghong Liu, Yingying Zhang, Zongcheng Yang, Jia Chen, Qian Han, Jing Lv, Zhihong Zhang
{"title":"Cross-Sectional Study on the Relationship Between Jawbone Types and Trabecular Bone Structures.","authors":"Honghong Liu, Yingying Zhang, Zongcheng Yang, Jia Chen, Qian Han, Jing Lv, Zhihong Zhang","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the relationship between jawbone types and trabecular bone structures. A total of 38 osseointegrated implants were placed in 33 partially edentulous patients (17 males and 16 females). The bone quality of the recipient sites was measured in Hounsfield units and classified according to the Norton and Gamble classification. Histomorphometric methods were employed to analyze the structure of trabecular bone, including bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb. Th), trabecular number, and trabecular separation. The mean values of the four variables in Type I were 52.66 ± 9.75%, 27.31 ± 12.73 µm, 22.77 ± 10.17/mm, and 24.01 ± 10.34 µm, respectively. The mean values for Types II/III were 37.92 ± 11.54%, 45.99 ± 26.71 µm, 11.58 ± 8.16/mm, and 82.39 ± 51.67 µm, respectively. The mean values for Type IV were 33.43 ± 10.32%, 20.27 ± 3.58 µm, 17.16 ± 6.42/mm, and 47.92 ± 29.11 µm, respectively. When comparing Type I with Type IV, BV/TV was the only variable that demonstrated a statistically significant difference (p < .001). In the comparison between Type I and Type II/III, all variables were statistically significant except for Tb. Th (p < .01). When comparing Type II/III with Type IV, Tb. Th was the only variable that showed a statistically significant difference (p < .01). It is crucial to select ideal implant sites before placement, considering the various bone types. Direct quantification of trabecular bone structure in a clinical setting is challenging; therefore, understanding bone types can aid in predicting implantation outcomes by assessing the relationship between bone type and trabecular bone structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":519890,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of oral implantology","volume":"52 3","pages":"169-175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of oral implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between jawbone types and trabecular bone structures. A total of 38 osseointegrated implants were placed in 33 partially edentulous patients (17 males and 16 females). The bone quality of the recipient sites was measured in Hounsfield units and classified according to the Norton and Gamble classification. Histomorphometric methods were employed to analyze the structure of trabecular bone, including bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb. Th), trabecular number, and trabecular separation. The mean values of the four variables in Type I were 52.66 ± 9.75%, 27.31 ± 12.73 µm, 22.77 ± 10.17/mm, and 24.01 ± 10.34 µm, respectively. The mean values for Types II/III were 37.92 ± 11.54%, 45.99 ± 26.71 µm, 11.58 ± 8.16/mm, and 82.39 ± 51.67 µm, respectively. The mean values for Type IV were 33.43 ± 10.32%, 20.27 ± 3.58 µm, 17.16 ± 6.42/mm, and 47.92 ± 29.11 µm, respectively. When comparing Type I with Type IV, BV/TV was the only variable that demonstrated a statistically significant difference (p < .001). In the comparison between Type I and Type II/III, all variables were statistically significant except for Tb. Th (p < .01). When comparing Type II/III with Type IV, Tb. Th was the only variable that showed a statistically significant difference (p < .01). It is crucial to select ideal implant sites before placement, considering the various bone types. Direct quantification of trabecular bone structure in a clinical setting is challenging; therefore, understanding bone types can aid in predicting implantation outcomes by assessing the relationship between bone type and trabecular bone structures.

颌骨类型与骨小梁结构关系的横断面研究。
本研究探讨颌骨类型与骨小梁结构的关系。33例部分无牙患者(男性17例,女性16例)共植入38颗骨整合种植体。受体部位的骨质量以Hounsfield单位测量,并根据Norton and Gamble分类进行分类。采用组织形态学方法分析骨小梁的结构,包括骨体积分数(BV/TV)、骨小梁厚度(Tb。Th),小梁数,小梁分离。1型4个变量的平均值分别为52.66±9.75%、27.31±12.73µm、22.77±10.17µm和24.01±10.34µm。II/III型的平均值分别为37.92±11.54%、45.99±26.71µm、11.58±8.16µm和82.39±51.67µm。IV型的平均值分别为33.43±10.32%、20.27±3.58µm、17.16±6.42µm和47.92±29.11µm。当比较I型和IV型时,BV/TV是唯一显示有统计学意义差异的变量(p < 0.001)。在I型与II/III型的比较中,除Tb外,其他变量均有统计学意义。p < 0.01)。当将II/III型与IV型进行比较时,Tb。这是唯一显示有统计学意义差异的变量(p < 0.01)。考虑到不同的骨类型,在植入前选择理想的植入位置是至关重要的。直接量化骨小梁结构在临床设置是具有挑战性的;因此,了解骨类型可以通过评估骨类型和骨小梁结构之间的关系来预测植入结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书