Agreement and diagnostic accuracy of noncycloplegic retinoscopy, subjective and autorefraction in a young adult Ghanaian population.

Samuel Kyei, Jehu Azure, Randy Asiamah, Michael A Kwarteng
{"title":"Agreement and diagnostic accuracy of noncycloplegic retinoscopy, subjective and autorefraction in a young adult Ghanaian population.","authors":"Samuel Kyei, Jehu Azure, Randy Asiamah, Michael A Kwarteng","doi":"10.4314/gmj.v60i1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the agreement and diagnostic accuracy of retinoscopy, subjective and autorefraction among young adults in a sampled Ghanaian population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Optometry Department of Bishop Ackom Memorial Christian Eye Centre, Cape Coast, Ghana.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Refractive error data were obtained from 100 adults aged 18-35 years (200 eyes)using autorefraction, retinoscopy and subjective refraction.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Spherical equivalent, J<sub>0</sub> and J<sub>45</sub> values, and sensitivity and specificity for myopia and hyperopia detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 23.38 ± 4.39 years, 61% females. This study used Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation to compare refractive techniques. For spherical equivalents, retinoscopy and subjective refraction yielded high agreement (ICC=0.9), and autorefraction and subjective refraction exhibited significant agreement (ICC=0.8, p < 0.001). Retinoscopy and subjective refraction showed a significant correlation (ICC = 0.81, p < 0.001). Similarly, autorefraction and subjective refraction for J<sub>0</sub> correlated (ICC=0.67, p < 0.001), and retinoscopy and subjective refraction showed low agreement on the J<sub>45</sub> axis (ICC=0.01, p=0.48). Autorefraction and subjective refraction were weakly but significantly correlated (ICC=0.22, p < 0.001). The specificity and sensitivity of retinoscopy in detecting myopia are similar to those of autorefraction. The accuracy of retinoscopy was greater than that of autorefraction in detecting myopia. However, retinoscopy and autorefraction demonstrated equal accuracy in detecting hyperopia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In young adults, retinoscopy shows strong agreement with subjective refraction, demonstrating its consistency in evaluating spherical equivalents and the J<sub>0</sub> axis. Although efficient, autorefraction showed reduced precision and less consistency for J<sub>45</sub> axis determination.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None declared.</p>","PeriodicalId":94319,"journal":{"name":"Ghana medical journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13231482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/gmj.v60i1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the agreement and diagnostic accuracy of retinoscopy, subjective and autorefraction among young adults in a sampled Ghanaian population.

Design: A descriptive cross-sectional design.

Setting: Optometry Department of Bishop Ackom Memorial Christian Eye Centre, Cape Coast, Ghana.

Participants: Refractive error data were obtained from 100 adults aged 18-35 years (200 eyes)using autorefraction, retinoscopy and subjective refraction.

Main outcome measures: Spherical equivalent, J0 and J45 values, and sensitivity and specificity for myopia and hyperopia detection.

Results: The mean age was 23.38 ± 4.39 years, 61% females. This study used Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation to compare refractive techniques. For spherical equivalents, retinoscopy and subjective refraction yielded high agreement (ICC=0.9), and autorefraction and subjective refraction exhibited significant agreement (ICC=0.8, p < 0.001). Retinoscopy and subjective refraction showed a significant correlation (ICC = 0.81, p < 0.001). Similarly, autorefraction and subjective refraction for J0 correlated (ICC=0.67, p < 0.001), and retinoscopy and subjective refraction showed low agreement on the J45 axis (ICC=0.01, p=0.48). Autorefraction and subjective refraction were weakly but significantly correlated (ICC=0.22, p < 0.001). The specificity and sensitivity of retinoscopy in detecting myopia are similar to those of autorefraction. The accuracy of retinoscopy was greater than that of autorefraction in detecting myopia. However, retinoscopy and autorefraction demonstrated equal accuracy in detecting hyperopia.

Conclusion: In young adults, retinoscopy shows strong agreement with subjective refraction, demonstrating its consistency in evaluating spherical equivalents and the J0 axis. Although efficient, autorefraction showed reduced precision and less consistency for J45 axis determination.

Funding: None declared.

非睫状体瘫痪的视网膜镜检查的一致性和诊断准确性,主观和自身屈光在一个年轻的成年加纳人口。
目的:确定一致性和诊断准确性的视网膜镜检查,主观和自身屈光在年轻人的抽样加纳人口。设计:描述性横断面设计。地点:加纳海岸角阿克姆主教纪念基督教眼科中心验光部。参与者:屈光不正数据来自100名18-35岁的成年人(200只眼睛),使用自体屈光、视网膜镜检查和主观屈光。主要观察指标:球形当量、J0和J45值、近视和远视检测的敏感性和特异性。结果:平均年龄23.38±4.39岁,女性占61%。本研究使用Bland-Altman分析和类内相关性来比较折射技术。对于球面等效物,视网膜镜和主观屈光具有很高的一致性(ICC=0.9),而自体屈光和主观屈光具有显著的一致性(ICC=0.8, p < 0.001)。视网膜镜检查与主观屈光有显著相关性(ICC = 0.81, p < 0.001)。同样,J0轴的自体屈光和主观屈光相关(ICC=0.67, p < 0.001),而视网膜镜和主观屈光在J45轴上的一致性较低(ICC=0.01, p=0.48)。自体屈光与主观屈光呈弱但显著相关(ICC=0.22, p < 0.001)。视网膜镜检查近视的特异性和敏感性与自体屈光检查相似。视网膜镜检查近视的准确率高于自体屈光检查。然而,视网膜镜检查和自体屈光检查在检测远视方面显示出相同的准确性。结论:在年轻人中,视网膜镜检查与主观屈光非常一致,证明了其在评估球等价物和J0轴方面的一致性。自折射法测定J45轴的精度较低,一致性较差。资金:未宣布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书