Single-injection adductor canal block with perineural dexamethasone versus continuous adductor canal catheter for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
David H Kim, Jonathan Beathe, Douglas S Wetmore, Enrique Goytizolo, Stephen C Haskins, Cephas Swamidoss, Julia F Reichel, Lisa Reisinger, Prashant Rao, Stavros G Memtsoudis, Jiabin Liu
{"title":"Single-injection adductor canal block with perineural dexamethasone versus continuous adductor canal catheter for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"David H Kim, Jonathan Beathe, Douglas S Wetmore, Enrique Goytizolo, Stephen C Haskins, Cephas Swamidoss, Julia F Reichel, Lisa Reisinger, Prashant Rao, Stavros G Memtsoudis, Jiabin Liu","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2026-107719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The adductor canal block (ACB), known for its motor-sparing properties, has gained popularity as part of the multimodal analgesic regimen in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. However, the duration of single-injection blocks is limited, potentially contributing to rebound pain after the first 24 hours. This study evaluates whether extending block duration using a continuous peripheral nerve catheter reduces opioid consumption during the 24-48 hour period following TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This participant-blinded and assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial included 94 patients undergoing primary, unilateral TKA. Patients were randomized into two groups: the single-injection group received a single-injection ACB (15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine) with 2 mg perineural dexamethasone; the continuous infusion group received a single-injection ACB (15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine) followed by a continuous adductor canal catheter infusing 0.2% ropivacaine at 8 mL/hour for 50 hours. Both groups received a standardized multimodal analgesic regimen, including iPACK (infiltration between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee) block, periarticular infiltration (PAI), and oral pain medications. The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the 24-48 hour postoperative period. Post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) opioid consumption was the single prespecified secondary outcome registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; all other outcomes were pre-planned exploratory analyses prespecified in the Institutional Review Board protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in opioid consumption during the 24-48 hour postoperative period between the continuous infusion and single-injection groups (median (IQR) 30 (15-60) mg vs 38.8 (22.9-69.4) mg; 95% CI of the median difference -22.50 to 7.00 mg; p=0.213). For the prespecified secondary outcome, opioid consumption in the PACU also did not differ significantly between groups (22.5 (16.2-30) mg vs 15 (15-30) mg; 95% CI of the median difference 0.00 to 13.50 mg; p=0.081). Catheter-associated buckling occurred in 7% of the continuous infusion group versus 0% in the single-injection group; all events were transient. No statistically significant differences were observed in patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay, or functional recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous adductor canal catheter infusion, initiated at the resolution of spinal anesthesia, did not reduce opioid consumption in the 24-48 hour postoperative period following primary TKA within a comprehensive multimodal analgesic regimen including perineural dexamethasone, iPACK block, PAI, oral pain medications, and continuous telemedicine-based pain consultation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03747146.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2026-107719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The adductor canal block (ACB), known for its motor-sparing properties, has gained popularity as part of the multimodal analgesic regimen in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. However, the duration of single-injection blocks is limited, potentially contributing to rebound pain after the first 24 hours. This study evaluates whether extending block duration using a continuous peripheral nerve catheter reduces opioid consumption during the 24-48 hour period following TKA.

Methods: This participant-blinded and assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial included 94 patients undergoing primary, unilateral TKA. Patients were randomized into two groups: the single-injection group received a single-injection ACB (15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine) with 2 mg perineural dexamethasone; the continuous infusion group received a single-injection ACB (15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine) followed by a continuous adductor canal catheter infusing 0.2% ropivacaine at 8 mL/hour for 50 hours. Both groups received a standardized multimodal analgesic regimen, including iPACK (infiltration between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee) block, periarticular infiltration (PAI), and oral pain medications. The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the 24-48 hour postoperative period. Post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) opioid consumption was the single prespecified secondary outcome registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; all other outcomes were pre-planned exploratory analyses prespecified in the Institutional Review Board protocol.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in opioid consumption during the 24-48 hour postoperative period between the continuous infusion and single-injection groups (median (IQR) 30 (15-60) mg vs 38.8 (22.9-69.4) mg; 95% CI of the median difference -22.50 to 7.00 mg; p=0.213). For the prespecified secondary outcome, opioid consumption in the PACU also did not differ significantly between groups (22.5 (16.2-30) mg vs 15 (15-30) mg; 95% CI of the median difference 0.00 to 13.50 mg; p=0.081). Catheter-associated buckling occurred in 7% of the continuous infusion group versus 0% in the single-injection group; all events were transient. No statistically significant differences were observed in patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay, or functional recovery.

Conclusions: Continuous adductor canal catheter infusion, initiated at the resolution of spinal anesthesia, did not reduce opioid consumption in the 24-48 hour postoperative period following primary TKA within a comprehensive multimodal analgesic regimen including perineural dexamethasone, iPACK block, PAI, oral pain medications, and continuous telemedicine-based pain consultation.

Trial registration number: NCT03747146.

单次注射内收管阻滞与神经周围地塞米松对比全膝关节置换术中连续内收管导管:一项随机对照试验。
背景:内收管阻滞(ACB)以其运动保护特性而闻名,已成为全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者多模式镇痛方案的一部分。然而,单次注射阻滞的持续时间有限,可能导致最初24小时后的反弹疼痛。本研究评估使用连续外周神经导管延长阻滞时间是否能减少TKA后24-48小时内阿片类药物的消耗。方法:这项参与者盲法和评估盲法随机对照试验包括94例原发性单侧TKA患者。患者随机分为两组:单次注射组给予单次注射ACB(0.25%布比卡因15 mL)和2 mg神经周围地塞米松;连续输注组给予单次注射ACB(0.25%布比卡因15 mL),随后内收管导管以8 mL/h连续输注0.2%罗哌卡因,连续输注50 h。两组均采用标准化的多模式镇痛方案,包括iPACK(腘动脉与膝关节后囊之间浸润)阻滞、关节周围浸润(PAI)和口服止痛药。主要结局是术后24-48小时内阿片类药物的消耗。在ClinicalTrials.gov上登记的麻醉后护理单位(PACU)阿片类药物消耗是单一预先指定的次要结局;所有其他结果都是预先计划的探索性分析,预先规定在机构审查委员会方案中。结果:连续输注组与单次注射组术后24-48小时阿片类药物消耗差异无统计学意义(中位数(IQR) 30 (15-60) mg vs 38.8 (22.9-69.4) mg;中位差的95% CI为-22.50 ~ 7.00 mg;p = 0.213)。对于预先指定的次要结果,PACU中的阿片类药物消耗在两组之间也没有显着差异(22.5 (16.2-30)mg vs 15 (15-30) mg;中位差的95% CI为0.00 ~ 13.50 mg;p = 0.081)。持续输注组导管相关屈曲发生率为7%,单次注射组为0%;所有的事件都是短暂的。在患者满意度、住院时间或功能恢复方面没有观察到统计学上的显著差异。结论:在脊髓麻醉解除后开始持续内收管导管输注,在包括神经周围地塞米松、iPACK阻滞、PAI、口服止痛药和持续远程医疗疼痛咨询在内的综合多模式镇痛方案中,原发性TKA术后24-48小时内并没有减少阿片类药物的消耗。试验注册号:NCT03747146。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书