Impact of offset polyethylene liners on acetabular component loosening : an Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry-based analysis.

IF 3.3 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Seyyed Hossein Shafiei, Marcos Raul Latorre, Andrew Shimmin
{"title":"Impact of offset polyethylene liners on acetabular component loosening : an Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry-based analysis.","authors":"Seyyed Hossein Shafiei, Marcos Raul Latorre, Andrew Shimmin","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.76.BJO-2026-0033.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Restoring native hip biomechanics is essential for the long-term success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Lateralized (offset) acetabular liners were developed to increase global offset and improve soft-tissue tension, but their effect on implant fixation and revision risk remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint arthroplasty Registry (AOANJRR). All primary conventional THAs for osteoarthritis performed between 2012 and 2022 using uncemented acetabular components with highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners were included. Procedures were categorized as lateralized liners (LL) or standard liners (SL). The primary outcome was revision for any reason; secondary outcomes included revision for loosening and acetabular loosening. Cumulative percent revision (CPR) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare groups after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and surgical approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 68,435 primary THAs were analyzed, including 1,182 LL and 67,253 SL procedures. Revision for any reason occurred in 3.21% of LL and 2.44% of SL cases. At nine-year follow-up, CPR was 4.1% (95% CI 2.8 to 6.0) for LL and 3.5% (95% CI 3.2 to 3.7) for SL. The adjusted hazard ratio for revision was 1.15 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.60, p = 0.386), indicating no significant difference between groups. Revision for acetabular loosening was rare and comparable (0.17% LL vs 0.12% SL).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large registry-based study, lateralized liners did not increase the risk of revision or loosening compared with standard liners. Despite being more frequently used in younger, male patients and in association with the posterior approach, lateralized liners demonstrated equivalent mid-term survivorship, supporting their safe use to optimize hip biomechanics without compromising implant fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"7 6","pages":"753-758"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13236415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.76.BJO-2026-0033.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Restoring native hip biomechanics is essential for the long-term success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Lateralized (offset) acetabular liners were developed to increase global offset and improve soft-tissue tension, but their effect on implant fixation and revision risk remains uncertain.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint arthroplasty Registry (AOANJRR). All primary conventional THAs for osteoarthritis performed between 2012 and 2022 using uncemented acetabular components with highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners were included. Procedures were categorized as lateralized liners (LL) or standard liners (SL). The primary outcome was revision for any reason; secondary outcomes included revision for loosening and acetabular loosening. Cumulative percent revision (CPR) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare groups after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and surgical approach.

Results: A total of 68,435 primary THAs were analyzed, including 1,182 LL and 67,253 SL procedures. Revision for any reason occurred in 3.21% of LL and 2.44% of SL cases. At nine-year follow-up, CPR was 4.1% (95% CI 2.8 to 6.0) for LL and 3.5% (95% CI 3.2 to 3.7) for SL. The adjusted hazard ratio for revision was 1.15 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.60, p = 0.386), indicating no significant difference between groups. Revision for acetabular loosening was rare and comparable (0.17% LL vs 0.12% SL).

Conclusion: In this large registry-based study, lateralized liners did not increase the risk of revision or loosening compared with standard liners. Despite being more frequently used in younger, male patients and in association with the posterior approach, lateralized liners demonstrated equivalent mid-term survivorship, supporting their safe use to optimize hip biomechanics without compromising implant fixation.

偏移聚乙烯衬垫对髋臼构件松动的影响:澳大利亚骨科协会全国关节置换登记分析。
目的:对全髋关节置换术(THA)的长期成功来说,恢复髋关节的生物力学是必不可少的。侧化(偏置)髋臼衬套用于增加整体偏置和改善软组织张力,但其对植入物固定和翻修风险的影响仍不确定。方法:采用澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节成形术登记处(AOANJRR)的数据进行回顾性队列研究。所有在2012年至2022年期间使用高度交联聚乙烯(HXLPE)衬垫的非骨水泥髋臼假体进行的骨关节炎原发性常规tha纳入研究。手术分为侧向衬管(LL)和标准衬管(SL)。主要结局是任何原因的修正;次要结果包括髋臼松动和髋臼松动的翻修。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计累积百分比修正(CPR),在调整年龄、性别、BMI、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级和手术入路后,使用Cox比例风险模型进行组间比较。结果:共分析68435例原发性tha,包括1182例LL手术和67253例SL手术。3.21%的LL和2.44%的SL病例发生了任何原因的翻修。在9年的随访中,LL的CPR为4.1% (95% CI 2.8至6.0),SL的CPR为3.5% (95% CI 3.2至3.7)。修订后的校正风险比为1.15 (95% CI 0.83至1.60,p = 0.386),表明组间无显著差异。髋臼松动的翻修非常罕见且具有可比性(0.17%左旋vs 0.12%左旋)。结论:在这项基于注册的大型研究中,与标准衬套相比,侧化衬套不会增加翻修或松动的风险。尽管更常用于年轻男性患者,并与后路入路相关,但侧化衬套显示出相当的中期生存率,支持其安全使用以优化髋关节生物力学而不影响植入物固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书