Stanley C Jordan, Sindhu Chandran, Noriko Ammerman, Edmund Huang, Jun Shoji, Xiaohai Zhang, Alice Peng, Bongha Shin, David Thomas, Reiad Najjar, Sanjeev Kumar, Peter Heeger, Ashley Vo
{"title":"CTLA4-Ig + Anti-IL-6/IL-6R Treatment Results in Long-term Allograft Survival and Function in Highly HLA-sensitized Patients.","authors":"Stanley C Jordan, Sindhu Chandran, Noriko Ammerman, Edmund Huang, Jun Shoji, Xiaohai Zhang, Alice Peng, Bongha Shin, David Thomas, Reiad Najjar, Sanjeev Kumar, Peter Heeger, Ashley Vo","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Highly HLA-sensitized (HS) patients are at increased risk for cell-mediated rejection (CMR)/antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) posttransplant and require intense immunosuppression to prevent these events. HS patients who experience calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) neuro/nephrotoxicity have few options as conversion to CNI-free regimens with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA4)-Ig may risk donor specific antibody (DSA) rebound, CMR, and AMR. This remains an unmet medical need. Anti-interleukin (IL)-6/IL-6R treatment is useful in treating AMR and CMR and preventing rejection in HS patients after transplantation (tx). Here, we examined the utility of combining CTLA4-Ig with anti-IL-6/IL-6R treatment in 4 HS patients with CNI toxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four HS patients (3 with calculated panel reactive antibodies >97% at tx and 1 who developed chronic-active AMR (c-aAMR) 14 y post-tx were evaluated. Two patients, 100% calculated panel reactive antibody and +flow crossmatch at transplantation, were desensitized with plasma exchange + clazakizumab (anti-IL-6) and maintained on clazakizumab post-tx and transitioned from CNI to CTLA4-Ig. Two patients treated with anti-IL-6R (tocilizumab) were transitioned to CTLA4-Ig at 2 and 11 y post-tx. Patients were monitored for renal function (RF), DSA, de novo DSA (dn-DSA), immune cell subsets, and patient and graft survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clazakizumab and tocilizumab treated patients showed improvements in RF, with elimination of existing DSAs, except for 1 patient and no dn-DSAs (>6 y). We also saw reductions in CD8<sup>+</sup> T<sub>EFF/MEM</sub>, T<sub>FH</sub>, B<sub>MEM</sub>, and NK cells post-CTLA4-Ig + Anti-IL-6/IL-6R treatment. T<sub>REG</sub> and B<sub>REG</sub> cell populations also increased, suggesting, but not confirming, possible immune modulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining CTLA4-Ig + anti-IL-6/IL-6R appears to offer benefits in sustaining RF, DSA reduction, possibly immune cell modulation, and prevention of dn-DSA. Importantly, CNI toxicity abated in all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"12 7","pages":"e1952"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13232908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Highly HLA-sensitized (HS) patients are at increased risk for cell-mediated rejection (CMR)/antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) posttransplant and require intense immunosuppression to prevent these events. HS patients who experience calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) neuro/nephrotoxicity have few options as conversion to CNI-free regimens with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA4)-Ig may risk donor specific antibody (DSA) rebound, CMR, and AMR. This remains an unmet medical need. Anti-interleukin (IL)-6/IL-6R treatment is useful in treating AMR and CMR and preventing rejection in HS patients after transplantation (tx). Here, we examined the utility of combining CTLA4-Ig with anti-IL-6/IL-6R treatment in 4 HS patients with CNI toxicity.
Methods: Four HS patients (3 with calculated panel reactive antibodies >97% at tx and 1 who developed chronic-active AMR (c-aAMR) 14 y post-tx were evaluated. Two patients, 100% calculated panel reactive antibody and +flow crossmatch at transplantation, were desensitized with plasma exchange + clazakizumab (anti-IL-6) and maintained on clazakizumab post-tx and transitioned from CNI to CTLA4-Ig. Two patients treated with anti-IL-6R (tocilizumab) were transitioned to CTLA4-Ig at 2 and 11 y post-tx. Patients were monitored for renal function (RF), DSA, de novo DSA (dn-DSA), immune cell subsets, and patient and graft survival.
Results: Clazakizumab and tocilizumab treated patients showed improvements in RF, with elimination of existing DSAs, except for 1 patient and no dn-DSAs (>6 y). We also saw reductions in CD8+ TEFF/MEM, TFH, BMEM, and NK cells post-CTLA4-Ig + Anti-IL-6/IL-6R treatment. TREG and BREG cell populations also increased, suggesting, but not confirming, possible immune modulation.
Conclusions: Combining CTLA4-Ig + anti-IL-6/IL-6R appears to offer benefits in sustaining RF, DSA reduction, possibly immune cell modulation, and prevention of dn-DSA. Importantly, CNI toxicity abated in all patients.