Manuel Gijón-Mediavilla, Anna Canet Tarrés, Lidia Oviedo Melgares, Eduardo López Fernández, Pablo Rojo Conejo, Sylvia Belda Hofheinz
{"title":"Health Professionals' Perceptions of End-of-Life Care in the PICU: Single-Center Survey in Spain.","authors":"Manuel Gijón-Mediavilla, Anna Canet Tarrés, Lidia Oviedo Melgares, Eduardo López Fernández, Pablo Rojo Conejo, Sylvia Belda Hofheinz","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of end-of-life care in the PICU and identify unmet needs and modifiable barriers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Post hoc analysis of quality of care staff surveys.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary university hospital PICU in Spain.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Survey data from physicians and nurses directly involved in the care of children who died in the PICU, from January 2017 to February 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was based on the PICU Quality of Dying and Death (PICU-QODD) instrument. A total of 73 surveys were completed following 80 deaths (91.3% response rate) by 68 physicians and five nurses. The median (interquartile range) age at death was 7.5 months (2-84 mo). Death following limitation or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment occurred in 33 of 73 cases (45.2%). Overall, median PICU-QODD scores were high across domains of symptom control, communication, emotional support, and decision-making. Anticipated deaths (42/73) were associated with higher ratings in areas including communication ( p = 0.002), shared decision-making ( p = 0.007), and emotional support ( p = 0.024), compared with unanticipated deaths. Qualitative survey comments identified positive practices such as respectful communication and coordinated team efforts, but also highlighted deficiencies including a lack of private spaces, emotional isolation, and insufficient institutional support. Respondents recommended improved bereavement follow-up, architectural enhancements, and routine debriefings. During the study period, 63% (95% CI, 51-73%) reported significant personal emotional impact, yet few had access to formal psychological support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review of surveys from healthcare professionals involved in pediatric deaths between 2017 and 2023 showed that end-of-life care was generally good but was limited by insufficient staff emotional support and shortcomings in the unit and hospital environment at that time. As part of an ongoing quality improvement process, these insights have led to the introduction of structured debriefings and initiatives to improve family spaces within our unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1054-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003978","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of end-of-life care in the PICU and identify unmet needs and modifiable barriers.
Design: Post hoc analysis of quality of care staff surveys.
Setting: Tertiary university hospital PICU in Spain.
Subjects: Survey data from physicians and nurses directly involved in the care of children who died in the PICU, from January 2017 to February 2023.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was based on the PICU Quality of Dying and Death (PICU-QODD) instrument. A total of 73 surveys were completed following 80 deaths (91.3% response rate) by 68 physicians and five nurses. The median (interquartile range) age at death was 7.5 months (2-84 mo). Death following limitation or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment occurred in 33 of 73 cases (45.2%). Overall, median PICU-QODD scores were high across domains of symptom control, communication, emotional support, and decision-making. Anticipated deaths (42/73) were associated with higher ratings in areas including communication ( p = 0.002), shared decision-making ( p = 0.007), and emotional support ( p = 0.024), compared with unanticipated deaths. Qualitative survey comments identified positive practices such as respectful communication and coordinated team efforts, but also highlighted deficiencies including a lack of private spaces, emotional isolation, and insufficient institutional support. Respondents recommended improved bereavement follow-up, architectural enhancements, and routine debriefings. During the study period, 63% (95% CI, 51-73%) reported significant personal emotional impact, yet few had access to formal psychological support.
Conclusions: Our review of surveys from healthcare professionals involved in pediatric deaths between 2017 and 2023 showed that end-of-life care was generally good but was limited by insufficient staff emotional support and shortcomings in the unit and hospital environment at that time. As part of an ongoing quality improvement process, these insights have led to the introduction of structured debriefings and initiatives to improve family spaces within our unit.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.