Rational use and regulatory stewardship for paediatric cough syrups in India: A public health imperative.

Prashant Chandra, M K Unnikrishnan
{"title":"Rational use and regulatory stewardship for paediatric cough syrups in India: A public health imperative.","authors":"Prashant Chandra, M K Unnikrishnan","doi":"10.20529/IJME.2026.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recurrent paediatric deaths from diethylene glycol (DEG)-contaminated cough syrups in India highlight critical failures in regulatory stewardship and rational medicine use. Despite global alerts and domestic advisories, children continue to be exposed to hazardous, non-essential multiple-drug combinations. This commentary analyses the intersection of clinical irrationality and regulatory gaps, arguing that persistent reliance on over-the-counter (OTC) cough syrups for self-limiting viral illnesses in children under five is ethically indefensible. We review recent incidents (2022-2025) and policy responses, identifying persistent weaknesses in supply-chain oversight and excipient testing. We propose a four-pillar stewardship roadmap: clinical restraint to curb unnecessary prescribing; rigorous quality assurance, including universal batch testing; intensified market surveillance; and public communication to counter misconceptions. Aligning India's paediatric pharmaceutical governance with WHO rational use principles is urgently needed to prevent further avoidable mortality and restore trust in the public health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":517372,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of medical ethics","volume":"XI 2","pages":"131-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of medical ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2026.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recurrent paediatric deaths from diethylene glycol (DEG)-contaminated cough syrups in India highlight critical failures in regulatory stewardship and rational medicine use. Despite global alerts and domestic advisories, children continue to be exposed to hazardous, non-essential multiple-drug combinations. This commentary analyses the intersection of clinical irrationality and regulatory gaps, arguing that persistent reliance on over-the-counter (OTC) cough syrups for self-limiting viral illnesses in children under five is ethically indefensible. We review recent incidents (2022-2025) and policy responses, identifying persistent weaknesses in supply-chain oversight and excipient testing. We propose a four-pillar stewardship roadmap: clinical restraint to curb unnecessary prescribing; rigorous quality assurance, including universal batch testing; intensified market surveillance; and public communication to counter misconceptions. Aligning India's paediatric pharmaceutical governance with WHO rational use principles is urgently needed to prevent further avoidable mortality and restore trust in the public health system.

印度小儿止咳糖浆的合理使用和管理:公共卫生的当务之急。
印度因二甘醇(DEG)污染的止咳糖浆而反复发生的儿科死亡突出了监管管理和合理用药方面的重大失误。尽管有全球警报和国内咨询,儿童仍然暴露于危险的、非必要的多种药物组合。这篇评论分析了临床非理性和监管缺口的交集,认为持续依赖非处方(OTC)咳嗽糖浆治疗5岁以下儿童的自限性病毒性疾病在伦理上是站不住脚的。我们回顾了最近的事件(2022-2025)和政策反应,确定了供应链监管和赋形剂测试方面的持续弱点。我们提出了一个四支柱管理路线图:临床约束以遏制不必要的处方;严格的质量保证,包括通用批量检测;加强市场监督;和公众沟通,以消除误解。迫切需要使印度的儿科药物治理与世卫组织合理使用原则保持一致,以防止进一步的可避免死亡并恢复对公共卫生系统的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书