Large-scale Searching for Causal Relationships of Body Mass Index Bridged Modifiable Lifestyle Factors on Colorectal Cancer Risk: A phenome-Wide Mendelian Randomization Study.

IF 6.2 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2026-01-26 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s43657-025-00270-5
Ming Shao, Wei Wang, Huiqin Li, Silu Chen, Xiao Liu, Hongsheng Ji, Meilin Wang, Junyi Xin, Mulong Du
{"title":"Large-scale Searching for Causal Relationships of Body Mass Index Bridged Modifiable Lifestyle Factors on Colorectal Cancer Risk: A phenome-Wide Mendelian Randomization Study.","authors":"Ming Shao, Wei Wang, Huiqin Li, Silu Chen, Xiao Liu, Hongsheng Ji, Meilin Wang, Junyi Xin, Mulong Du","doi":"10.1007/s43657-025-00270-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, mendelian randomization (MR) has played an important role in studying causality. However, due to the unique role of third-party variables, false positive conclusions may arise in the process of causal inference. We aimed to assess the body mass index (BMI)-mediated effect of modifiable lifestyle factors on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The MR phenome-wide association study (MR-pheWAS) was initially performed to identify BMI-relevant lifestyle factors. Heritability estimation, genetic correlation, inverse-variance weighted MR analysis, and mediation analysis were conducted to evaluate the causal relationships among lifestyle, BMI, and CRC in the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO). The FinnGen database was used to replicate the above results on genetic results and the UK Biobank cohort provided population-level validation for the causality. We initially analyzed the causal relationship between 32,760 phenotypes and BMI through MR-pheWAS. Five lifestyles (i.e., alcohol intake, time spent watching television, walking, walking pace, and smoking status) were found to causally affect BMI. Our results supported a causal association between genetically proxied BMI and CRC [odds ratio (OR)<sub>GECCO</sub> = 1.192 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.038-1.369); OR<sub>FinnGen</sub> = 1.567 (95%CI: 1.398-1.756)]. Notably, alcohol intake [β<sub>GECCO</sub> = 0.252 (95%CI: 0.002-0.502), β<sub>FinnGen</sub> = 0.285 (95%CI: 0.085-0.484)] and time spent watching TV [β<sub>GECCO</sub> = 0.470 (95%CI: 0.015-0.924), β<sub>FinnGen</sub> = 0.421 (95%CI: 0.084-0.758)] had a direct causal effect on increasing CRC risk. The following effect decomposition indicated that the effect of alcohol intake on CRC was marked by BMI [proportion<sub>GECCO</sub> = 5.556% (95% CI: 0.397-9.518%) and proportion<sub>FinnGen</sub> = 8.421% (95% CI: 4.912-12.982)]. The proportion of the effect of time spent watching television on CRC mediated by BMI was 9.722% (95% CI: 0.198-19.246%) in GECCO and 16.936% (95% CI: 11.650-22.977%) in FinnGen. In contrast, the full effects of walking, walking pace, and smoking status on CRC were entirely mediated by BMI. A similar mediation pathway was observed in the UK Biobank cohort. This study, combining genetics-driven causal inference, provides evidence for the relationship between lifestyle factors and the risk of CRC ,helping to prioritize strategies for CRC prevention in populations.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43657-025-00270-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":74435,"journal":{"name":"Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland)","volume":"6 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13226770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43657-025-00270-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, mendelian randomization (MR) has played an important role in studying causality. However, due to the unique role of third-party variables, false positive conclusions may arise in the process of causal inference. We aimed to assess the body mass index (BMI)-mediated effect of modifiable lifestyle factors on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The MR phenome-wide association study (MR-pheWAS) was initially performed to identify BMI-relevant lifestyle factors. Heritability estimation, genetic correlation, inverse-variance weighted MR analysis, and mediation analysis were conducted to evaluate the causal relationships among lifestyle, BMI, and CRC in the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO). The FinnGen database was used to replicate the above results on genetic results and the UK Biobank cohort provided population-level validation for the causality. We initially analyzed the causal relationship between 32,760 phenotypes and BMI through MR-pheWAS. Five lifestyles (i.e., alcohol intake, time spent watching television, walking, walking pace, and smoking status) were found to causally affect BMI. Our results supported a causal association between genetically proxied BMI and CRC [odds ratio (OR)GECCO = 1.192 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.038-1.369); ORFinnGen = 1.567 (95%CI: 1.398-1.756)]. Notably, alcohol intake [βGECCO = 0.252 (95%CI: 0.002-0.502), βFinnGen = 0.285 (95%CI: 0.085-0.484)] and time spent watching TV [βGECCO = 0.470 (95%CI: 0.015-0.924), βFinnGen = 0.421 (95%CI: 0.084-0.758)] had a direct causal effect on increasing CRC risk. The following effect decomposition indicated that the effect of alcohol intake on CRC was marked by BMI [proportionGECCO = 5.556% (95% CI: 0.397-9.518%) and proportionFinnGen = 8.421% (95% CI: 4.912-12.982)]. The proportion of the effect of time spent watching television on CRC mediated by BMI was 9.722% (95% CI: 0.198-19.246%) in GECCO and 16.936% (95% CI: 11.650-22.977%) in FinnGen. In contrast, the full effects of walking, walking pace, and smoking status on CRC were entirely mediated by BMI. A similar mediation pathway was observed in the UK Biobank cohort. This study, combining genetics-driven causal inference, provides evidence for the relationship between lifestyle factors and the risk of CRC ,helping to prioritize strategies for CRC prevention in populations.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43657-025-00270-5.

大规模搜索体重指数桥接可改变的生活方式因素与结直肠癌风险的因果关系:一项全现象的孟德尔随机研究。
目前,孟德尔随机化(MR)在因果关系研究中发挥了重要作用。然而,由于第三方变量的独特作用,在因果推理过程中可能会出现假阳性结论。我们旨在评估体重指数(BMI)介导的可改变生活方式因素对结直肠癌(CRC)风险的影响。MR全现象关联研究(MR- phewas)最初是为了确定与bmi相关的生活方式因素。在结直肠癌遗传与流行病学联合会(GECCO)中,通过遗传力估计、遗传相关性、反方差加权MR分析和中介分析来评估生活方式、BMI和结直肠癌之间的因果关系。使用FinnGen数据库在遗传结果上复制上述结果,英国生物银行队列提供了人口水平的因果关系验证。我们通过MR-pheWAS初步分析了32760种表型与BMI之间的因果关系。研究发现,五种生活方式(即饮酒、看电视的时间、步行、步行速度和吸烟状况)会对BMI产生因果影响。我们的结果支持遗传代理BMI和CRC之间的因果关系[优势比(OR)GECCO = 1.192(95%可信区间(CI): 1.038-1.369);ORFinnGen = 1.567 (95%CI: 1.398-1.756)]。值得注意的是,饮酒[βGECCO = 0.252 (95%CI: 0.002-0.502), βFinnGen = 0.285 (95%CI: 0.085-0.484)]和看电视时间[βGECCO = 0.470 (95%CI: 0.015-0.924), βFinnGen = 0.421 (95%CI: 0.084-0.758)]与结直肠癌风险增加有直接因果关系。以下效应分解表明,酒精摄入对结直肠癌的影响以BMI为标志[proporongecco = 5.556% (95% CI: 0.397-9.518%), proporongfinngen = 8.421% (95% CI: 4.912-12.982)]。在GECCO和FinnGen中,看电视时间对BMI介导的结直肠癌的影响比例分别为9.722% (95% CI: 0.198-19.246%)和16.936% (95% CI: 11.650-22.977%)。相比之下,步行、步行速度和吸烟状况对结直肠癌的全部影响完全由BMI介导。在英国生物银行队列中观察到类似的中介途径。本研究结合遗传驱动的因果推理,为生活方式因素与结直肠癌风险之间的关系提供了证据,有助于在人群中优先考虑预防结直肠癌的策略。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址为10.1007/s43657-025-00270-5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书