Drosophila jump muscle myofibrils: A new tool for investigating activation and relaxation.

IF 2.6 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Biophysical reports Pub Date : 2026-09-09 Epub Date: 2026-06-02 DOI:10.1016/j.bpr.2026.100268
Axel Fenwick, Bernadette M Glasheen, Anthony Cammarato, Douglas M Swank
{"title":"Drosophila jump muscle myofibrils: A new tool for investigating activation and relaxation.","authors":"Axel Fenwick, Bernadette M Glasheen, Anthony Cammarato, Douglas M Swank","doi":"10.1016/j.bpr.2026.100268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drosophila models have proven invaluable for studying skeletal and cardiac muscle diseases. While permeabilized indirect flight muscle (IFM) and jump muscle fibers from Drosophila yield insightful mechanical data, these preparations cannot resolve the kinetics of activation and relaxation because calcium diffusion into the fiber core is rate limited at this scale. In contrast, myofibrils have a diameter of only 1-3 μm, making them ideal for measuring physiologically relevant activation and relaxation rates. However, previous attempts using IFMs failed to produce myofibrils that generated measurable active force, likely due to the muscle's inherently low force output. Therefore, instead of using IFMs as the source, we developed a method to isolate myofibrils from the Drosophila jump muscle. By applying brief, low-amplitude sonication to permeabilized jump muscles, we isolated myofibrils that produced 19.8 ± 10.5 mN/mm<sup>2</sup> net active tension, the first active force measurements from an insect myofibril, with an activation rate of 8.2 ± 4.0 s<sup>-1</sup>. Jump muscle myofibrils exhibited the typical biphasic relaxation seen in vertebrates: an initial slow, linear phase lasting 75.6 ± 21.1 ms, followed by a fast exponential decay with a rate constant of 19.7 ± 9.6 s<sup>-1</sup>. We also characterized myofibrils from jump muscles transgenically expressing a Drosophila larval body wall myosin isoform (EMB), which we previously reported displays slower actin-binding and detachment kinetics. EMB expression caused a 1.6-fold increase in active tension and a 38% slower activation rate compared with controls but did not change relaxation parameters. These characterizations and comparisons highlight the scientific value of expressing customizable sarcomeric proteins in transgenic Drosophila jump muscle myofibrils to elucidate their contributions to muscle activation and relaxation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72402,"journal":{"name":"Biophysical reports","volume":" ","pages":"100268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13316580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysical reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpr.2026.100268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drosophila models have proven invaluable for studying skeletal and cardiac muscle diseases. While permeabilized indirect flight muscle (IFM) and jump muscle fibers from Drosophila yield insightful mechanical data, these preparations cannot resolve the kinetics of activation and relaxation because calcium diffusion into the fiber core is rate limited at this scale. In contrast, myofibrils have a diameter of only 1-3 μm, making them ideal for measuring physiologically relevant activation and relaxation rates. However, previous attempts using IFMs failed to produce myofibrils that generated measurable active force, likely due to the muscle's inherently low force output. Therefore, instead of using IFMs as the source, we developed a method to isolate myofibrils from the Drosophila jump muscle. By applying brief, low-amplitude sonication to permeabilized jump muscles, we isolated myofibrils that produced 19.8 ± 10.5 mN/mm2 net active tension, the first active force measurements from an insect myofibril, with an activation rate of 8.2 ± 4.0 s-1. Jump muscle myofibrils exhibited the typical biphasic relaxation seen in vertebrates: an initial slow, linear phase lasting 75.6 ± 21.1 ms, followed by a fast exponential decay with a rate constant of 19.7 ± 9.6 s-1. We also characterized myofibrils from jump muscles transgenically expressing a Drosophila larval body wall myosin isoform (EMB), which we previously reported displays slower actin-binding and detachment kinetics. EMB expression caused a 1.6-fold increase in active tension and a 38% slower activation rate compared with controls but did not change relaxation parameters. These characterizations and comparisons highlight the scientific value of expressing customizable sarcomeric proteins in transgenic Drosophila jump muscle myofibrils to elucidate their contributions to muscle activation and relaxation.

果蝇跳跃肌肌原纤维:研究激活和放松的新工具。
果蝇模型已被证明在研究骨骼和心肌疾病方面是无价的。虽然来自果蝇的渗透间接飞行肌(IFM)和跳跃肌纤维产生了深刻的力学数据,但这些制剂不能解决激活和松弛的动力学问题,因为在这种规模下,钙扩散到纤维核心的速率有限。相比之下,肌原纤维的直径只有1-3 μm,使其成为测量生理相关激活和松弛率的理想选择。然而,先前使用ifm的尝试未能产生产生可测量的主动力量的肌原纤维,可能是由于肌肉固有的低力输出。因此,我们开发了一种从果蝇跳跃肌中分离肌原纤维的方法,而不是使用ifm作为来源。通过对渗透跳跃肌进行简短的低振幅超声,我们分离出了产生19.8±10.5 mN/mm2净主动张力的肌原纤维,这是首次从昆虫肌原纤维中测量到的主动张力,激活率为8.2±4.0 s-1。跳跃肌肌原纤维表现出脊椎动物典型的双相松弛:开始是缓慢的线性阶段,持续76±2 ms,随后是快速的指数衰减,速率常数为19.7±9.6 s-1。我们还鉴定了来自跳跃肌的肌原纤维,转基因表达果蝇幼虫体壁肌球蛋白异构体(EMB),我们之前报道过其表现出较慢的肌动蛋白结合和脱离动力学。与对照组相比,EMB表达导致主动张力增加1.6倍,激活率降低38%,但没有改变松弛参数。这些特征和比较突出了在转基因果蝇跳跃肌肌原纤维中表达可定制的肌肉蛋白以阐明其对肌肉激活和松弛的贡献的科学价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biophysical reports
Biophysical reports Biophysics
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
75 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书