Stool Microbiota, Metabolites, and Fecal Incontinence in Women.

IF 1.2 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lily A Arya, Purna C Kashyap, Megan U Carnes, Ravi Mathur, Holly E Richter, Uduak U Andy, J Eric Jelovsek, Nazema Y Siddiqui, Casey D Morrow, Elliot J Lefkowitz, William J Van Der Pol, Corey Broeckling, Benjamin Carper, Sarah E S Jeney, Halina M Zyczynski, Keisha Y Dyer, Cassandra Carberry, Donna Mazloomdoost, Marie G Gantz
{"title":"Stool Microbiota, Metabolites, and Fecal Incontinence in Women.","authors":"Lily A Arya, Purna C Kashyap, Megan U Carnes, Ravi Mathur, Holly E Richter, Uduak U Andy, J Eric Jelovsek, Nazema Y Siddiqui, Casey D Morrow, Elliot J Lefkowitz, William J Van Der Pol, Corey Broeckling, Benjamin Carper, Sarah E S Jeney, Halina M Zyczynski, Keisha Y Dyer, Cassandra Carberry, Donna Mazloomdoost, Marie G Gantz","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Stool metabolites influencing gut motility and sensation may contribute to fecal incontinence (FI).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to test whether FI is associated with higher levels of butyrate and Clostridiales taxa in stool.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Stool metabolites and microbiota were compared between 96 women with FI and 42 controls. FI frequency and subtype (urgency vs insensible) were measured using a 14-day bowel diary, St. Mark's score, and the Accidental Bowel Leakage questionnaire. Metabolite analysis included targeted analysis (8 short-chain fatty acids including butyrate, 17 bile acids, and 8 tryptophan derivatives) and untargeted analysis. Stool microbiota were characterized using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Multivariable and exploratory multiomics factor analysis were performed with statistical significance defined as false discovery rate (FDR) ≤0.10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FI group had a higher proportion of Bristol stool types 2 and 6 than controls (P = 0.005). The mean number of leaks for the FI group was 1.7 ± 1.7 per day, 38% had urgency FI, and 39% had insensible FI. There was no significant difference between groups in butyrate levels and Clostridiales taxa. Multiomics analysis identified glycerolipids (monoacylglycerols and diacylglycerols) associated with FI (FDR = 0.08). In addition, insensible FI was associated with glycerolipids, long-chain saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, phospholipids, and dipeptides (FDR = 0.08-0.09). The top weighted microbiota associated with these metabolites were Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae; however, these taxa were not directly associated with FI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Butyrate and Clostridiales were not associated with FI. Novel stool metabolite signatures were identified, suggesting new biological pathways and potential therapeutic targets for FI.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Stool metabolites influencing gut motility and sensation may contribute to fecal incontinence (FI).

Objective: The objective of this study was to test whether FI is associated with higher levels of butyrate and Clostridiales taxa in stool.

Study design: Stool metabolites and microbiota were compared between 96 women with FI and 42 controls. FI frequency and subtype (urgency vs insensible) were measured using a 14-day bowel diary, St. Mark's score, and the Accidental Bowel Leakage questionnaire. Metabolite analysis included targeted analysis (8 short-chain fatty acids including butyrate, 17 bile acids, and 8 tryptophan derivatives) and untargeted analysis. Stool microbiota were characterized using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Multivariable and exploratory multiomics factor analysis were performed with statistical significance defined as false discovery rate (FDR) ≤0.10.

Results: The FI group had a higher proportion of Bristol stool types 2 and 6 than controls (P = 0.005). The mean number of leaks for the FI group was 1.7 ± 1.7 per day, 38% had urgency FI, and 39% had insensible FI. There was no significant difference between groups in butyrate levels and Clostridiales taxa. Multiomics analysis identified glycerolipids (monoacylglycerols and diacylglycerols) associated with FI (FDR = 0.08). In addition, insensible FI was associated with glycerolipids, long-chain saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, phospholipids, and dipeptides (FDR = 0.08-0.09). The top weighted microbiota associated with these metabolites were Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae; however, these taxa were not directly associated with FI.

Conclusion: Butyrate and Clostridiales were not associated with FI. Novel stool metabolite signatures were identified, suggesting new biological pathways and potential therapeutic targets for FI.

女性粪便微生物群、代谢物和大便失禁。
重要性:粪便代谢物影响肠道运动和感觉可能导致大便失禁(FI)。目的:本研究的目的是测试FI是否与粪便中较高水平的丁酸盐和梭菌类群有关。研究设计:比较96名FI女性和42名对照组的粪便代谢物和微生物群。使用14天肠道日记、St. Mark评分和意外肠漏问卷来测量FI频率和亚型(急迫性与无感性)。代谢物分析包括靶向分析(8种短链脂肪酸,包括丁酸酯、17种胆汁酸和8种色氨酸衍生物)和非靶向分析。采用16S rRNA基因测序对粪便微生物群进行了特征分析。进行多变量和探索性多组学因素分析,以错误发现率(FDR)≤0.10定义为统计学显著性。结果:FI组布里斯托大便2型和6型比例高于对照组(P = 0.005)。FI组的平均渗漏次数为每天1.7±1.7次,38%为急迫性FI, 39%为不知觉性FI。各组间丁酸盐水平和梭菌类群差异不显著。多组学分析发现甘油脂(单酰基甘油和二酰基甘油)与FI相关(FDR = 0.08)。此外,不敏感FI与甘油脂、长链饱和和单不饱和脂肪酸、磷脂和二肽有关(FDR = 0.08-0.09)。与这些代谢物相关的微生物群权重最高的是毛螺科和瘤胃球菌科;然而,这些分类群与FI没有直接关系。结论:丁酸盐和梭菌与FI无相关性。发现了新的粪便代谢物特征,提示了新的生物学途径和潜在的治疗靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书