The gender wealth gap and the role of private pension wealth in Great Britain.

IF 1.5 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Review of Economics of the Household Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-13 DOI:10.1007/s11150-026-09840-6
Brian Nolan, Juan C Palomino
{"title":"The gender wealth gap and the role of private pension wealth in Great Britain.","authors":"Brian Nolan, Juan C Palomino","doi":"10.1007/s11150-026-09840-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on gender wealth gaps is hampered by the fact that most wealth surveys gather information on wealth at the household or family level rather than for individuals, and also often do not include pension wealth. Here we exploit the rich data on individual wealth including private pension wealth (occupational and personal) obtained by the British Wealth and Assets Survey (WAS) to assess the gender wealth gap in Great Britain between 2006-08 and 2018-20, with a particular focus on the prominent role of private pension wealth. We find that in 2018-20 mean wealth for women was 34.0% lower than for men when pension wealth was included versus only 16.3% lower when it was not. Decomposition analysis shows that differences between men's and women's observed socioeconomic characteristics account for a significant share of the private pension wealth gap, with differences in labour market experiences (labour income, career gaps and part-time jobs) playing a key role. We also find an increase in the absolute gender pension gap over time that is associated with the rising proportion of pension wealth held in Defined Contribution (DC) schemes that are based on the return on accumulated pension contribution 'pots' rather than Defined Benefit (DB) schemes where entitlement is based on salary and years of service. Financial and business wealth is also an important contributor to the overall wealth gap, and like pension wealth its contribution is seen to increase towards the top of the distribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":47111,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economics of the Household","volume":"24 2","pages":"791-838"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13226409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economics of the Household","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-026-09840-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on gender wealth gaps is hampered by the fact that most wealth surveys gather information on wealth at the household or family level rather than for individuals, and also often do not include pension wealth. Here we exploit the rich data on individual wealth including private pension wealth (occupational and personal) obtained by the British Wealth and Assets Survey (WAS) to assess the gender wealth gap in Great Britain between 2006-08 and 2018-20, with a particular focus on the prominent role of private pension wealth. We find that in 2018-20 mean wealth for women was 34.0% lower than for men when pension wealth was included versus only 16.3% lower when it was not. Decomposition analysis shows that differences between men's and women's observed socioeconomic characteristics account for a significant share of the private pension wealth gap, with differences in labour market experiences (labour income, career gaps and part-time jobs) playing a key role. We also find an increase in the absolute gender pension gap over time that is associated with the rising proportion of pension wealth held in Defined Contribution (DC) schemes that are based on the return on accumulated pension contribution 'pots' rather than Defined Benefit (DB) schemes where entitlement is based on salary and years of service. Financial and business wealth is also an important contributor to the overall wealth gap, and like pension wealth its contribution is seen to increase towards the top of the distribution.

性别贫富差距与英国私人养老金财富的作用。
大多数财富调查收集的是家庭或家庭层面的财富信息,而不是个人的财富信息,而且往往不包括养老金财富,这阻碍了对性别财富差距的研究。在这里,我们利用英国财富和资产调查(WAS)获得的丰富的个人财富数据,包括私人养老金财富(职业和个人),来评估2006-08年至2018-20年间英国的性别贫富差距,特别关注私人养老金财富的突出作用。我们发现,在2018- 2020年,如果包括养老金财富,女性的平均财富比男性低34.0%,而在不包括养老金财富的情况下,女性的平均财富只比男性低16.3%。分解分析表明,男性和女性观察到的社会经济特征之间的差异在私人养老金财富差距中占很大比例,劳动力市场经验(劳动收入、职业差距和兼职工作)的差异起着关键作用。我们还发现,随着时间的推移,绝对性别养老金差距也在扩大,这与固定缴款(DC)计划中持有的养老金财富比例上升有关。固定缴款(DC)计划基于累积养老金缴款“池”的回报,而不是基于工资和服务年限的固定福利(DB)计划。金融和商业财富也是造成整体贫富差距的一个重要因素,与养老金财富一样,其对财富分配的贡献也越来越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Review of Economics of the Household publishes high-quality empirical and theoretical research on the economic behavior and decision-making processes of single and multi-person households. The Review is not wedded to any particular models or methods. It welcomes both macro-economic and micro-level applications. Household decisions analyzed in this journal include ·         household production of human capital, health, nutrition/food, childcare, and eldercare, ·         well-being of persons living in households, issues of gender and power, ·         fertility and risky behaviors, ·         consumption, savings and wealth accumulation, ·         labor force participation and time use,·         household formation (including marriage, cohabitation and fertility) and dissolution,·         migration, intergenerational transfers,·         experiments involving households,·         religiosity and civility.The journal is particularly interested in policy-relevant economic analyses and equally interested in applications to countries at various levels of economic development. The Perspectives section covers articles on the history of economic thought and review articles. Officially cited as: Rev Econ Household
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书