Understanding Engagement in Collaborative Governance Networks Through Motivation, Learning, and Values

IF 3.4 3区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environmental Policy and Governance Pub Date : 2026-06-03 Epub Date: 2026-03-16 DOI:10.1002/eet.70058
Gustav Osberg
{"title":"Understanding Engagement in Collaborative Governance Networks Through Motivation, Learning, and Values","authors":"Gustav Osberg","doi":"10.1002/eet.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Collaborative governance networks are increasingly central to local climate action, yet research offers limited understanding of the personal, psychological, and informal factors that sustain engagement within them. This paper examines how such networks facilitate meaningful and lasting participation through an in-depth study of Malmö Works, a long-standing public–private collaboration focused on sustainable mobility in Malmö, Sweden. Drawing on more than 2 years of process-oriented, action-informed qualitative research, including participant observation, interviews, workshops, and document analysis, the study investigates how individual motivations, organisational conditions, and network structures interact to support climate action. Integrating perspectives from Self-Determination Theory and values research with collaborative governance scholarship, the analysis identifies three intertwined learning processes: <i>knowing the issue</i>, <i>knowing each other</i>, and <i>knowing the possibilities</i> that enable participants to translate abstract climate ambitions into concrete, contextually grounded action. These processes are reinforced by three motivational conditions: <i>autonomy</i> through participant-driven co-creation, <i>relatedness</i> fostered by informal relational practices, and <i>competence</i> built through experimentation and open exchange. The paper contributes an integrated framework that distinguishes between process and outcome dimensions of values and goals in collaborative governance, with learning linking the two. It argues that networks such as Malmö Works advance climate action not only by coordinating activities, but by cultivating shared purpose and agency. However, the same informality enabling these benefits also generates vulnerabilities related to continuity, institutionalisation, and representativeness. The study concludes with implications for designing collaborative governance networks capable of supporting durable, equitable, and scalable climate action.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"36 3","pages":"460-475"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.70058","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.70058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative governance networks are increasingly central to local climate action, yet research offers limited understanding of the personal, psychological, and informal factors that sustain engagement within them. This paper examines how such networks facilitate meaningful and lasting participation through an in-depth study of Malmö Works, a long-standing public–private collaboration focused on sustainable mobility in Malmö, Sweden. Drawing on more than 2 years of process-oriented, action-informed qualitative research, including participant observation, interviews, workshops, and document analysis, the study investigates how individual motivations, organisational conditions, and network structures interact to support climate action. Integrating perspectives from Self-Determination Theory and values research with collaborative governance scholarship, the analysis identifies three intertwined learning processes: knowing the issue, knowing each other, and knowing the possibilities that enable participants to translate abstract climate ambitions into concrete, contextually grounded action. These processes are reinforced by three motivational conditions: autonomy through participant-driven co-creation, relatedness fostered by informal relational practices, and competence built through experimentation and open exchange. The paper contributes an integrated framework that distinguishes between process and outcome dimensions of values and goals in collaborative governance, with learning linking the two. It argues that networks such as Malmö Works advance climate action not only by coordinating activities, but by cultivating shared purpose and agency. However, the same informality enabling these benefits also generates vulnerabilities related to continuity, institutionalisation, and representativeness. The study concludes with implications for designing collaborative governance networks capable of supporting durable, equitable, and scalable climate action.

Abstract Image

通过动机、学习和价值观来理解协作治理网络中的参与
协作治理网络日益成为地方气候行动的核心,但研究对维持其中参与的个人、心理和非正式因素的理解有限。本文通过对Malmö Works的深入研究,探讨了此类网络如何促进有意义和持久的参与。Malmö Works是瑞典Malmö的一个长期公私合作项目,重点关注可持续交通。通过两年多的过程导向、行动导向的定性研究,包括参与者观察、访谈、研讨会和文件分析,该研究调查了个人动机、组织条件和网络结构如何相互作用以支持气候行动。该分析将自我决定理论和价值观研究的观点与协作治理奖学金相结合,确定了三个相互交织的学习过程:了解问题、了解彼此、了解使参与者能够将抽象的气候目标转化为具体的、基于背景的行动的可能性。这些过程通过三个激励条件得到加强:通过参与者驱动的共同创造实现的自主性,通过非正式关系实践培养的关联性,以及通过实验和开放交流建立的能力。本文提供了一个综合框架,区分协作治理中价值和目标的过程维度和结果维度,并将两者联系起来。报告认为,Malmö Works等网络不仅通过协调活动,而且通过培养共同的目标和机构来推进气候行动。然而,实现这些好处的同样的非正式性也产生了与连续性、制度化和代表性相关的脆弱性。该研究总结了设计能够支持持久、公平和可扩展的气候行动的协作治理网络的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Policy and Governance
Environmental Policy and Governance ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Environmental Policy and Governance is an international, inter-disciplinary journal affiliated with the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE). The journal seeks to advance interdisciplinary environmental research and its use to support novel solutions in environmental policy and governance. The journal publishes innovative, high quality articles which examine, or are relevant to, the environmental policies that are introduced by governments or the diverse forms of environmental governance that emerge in markets and civil society. The journal includes papers that examine how different forms of policy and governance emerge and exert influence at scales ranging from local to global and in diverse developmental and environmental contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书