Open Space Policy-Making and Planning in Urban Regions: Towards a Theoretical Approach Based on the Multiple Streams Framework

IF 3.4 3区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environmental Policy and Governance Pub Date : 2026-06-03 Epub Date: 2026-04-13 DOI:10.1002/eet.70070
Gerd Lintz, Mariam Diagayété
{"title":"Open Space Policy-Making and Planning in Urban Regions: Towards a Theoretical Approach Based on the Multiple Streams Framework","authors":"Gerd Lintz,&nbsp;Mariam Diagayété","doi":"10.1002/eet.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Open space networks provide multiple ecosystem services and other benefits which are particularly important to urban regions. Accordingly, there are many examples around the world of urban-regional open space policies such as regional parks and green belts that connect non-built-up areas over several municipalities. Yet it is still unclear how and why this kind of policy can prevail in regional political decision-making against often strongly competing forms of land use. In this conceptual paper, we elaborate a theoretical approach to explain the adoption and implementation of the mentioned open space policies. Focusing on policy-making and planning processes, we use the well-established Multiple Streams Framework (MSF), originally developed by Kingdon, which has been subsequently refined and extended over the years. Drawing on relevant strands of literature, our paper applies the MSF to the field of open space policy-making and planning in conurbations. In line with our understanding of the framework, the likelihood of a significant policy being adopted and implemented in this policy field increases when three largely independent process streams (problem, policy and political) are coupled by a capable policy entrepreneur during a policy window, and this coupling is subsequently maintained. Our approach goes beyond Kingdon's original MSF by introducing an initial and an implementation phase to the analysis. At the same time, we integrate many process-related aspects of spatial and open space research into our MSF-based theoretical approach. The result is summarised in a set of seven propositions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"36 3","pages":"674-684"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.70070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.70070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Open space networks provide multiple ecosystem services and other benefits which are particularly important to urban regions. Accordingly, there are many examples around the world of urban-regional open space policies such as regional parks and green belts that connect non-built-up areas over several municipalities. Yet it is still unclear how and why this kind of policy can prevail in regional political decision-making against often strongly competing forms of land use. In this conceptual paper, we elaborate a theoretical approach to explain the adoption and implementation of the mentioned open space policies. Focusing on policy-making and planning processes, we use the well-established Multiple Streams Framework (MSF), originally developed by Kingdon, which has been subsequently refined and extended over the years. Drawing on relevant strands of literature, our paper applies the MSF to the field of open space policy-making and planning in conurbations. In line with our understanding of the framework, the likelihood of a significant policy being adopted and implemented in this policy field increases when three largely independent process streams (problem, policy and political) are coupled by a capable policy entrepreneur during a policy window, and this coupling is subsequently maintained. Our approach goes beyond Kingdon's original MSF by introducing an initial and an implementation phase to the analysis. At the same time, we integrate many process-related aspects of spatial and open space research into our MSF-based theoretical approach. The result is summarised in a set of seven propositions.

Abstract Image

城市区域开放空间决策与规划:基于多流框架的理论研究
开放空间网络提供多种生态系统服务和其他效益,这对城市地区尤为重要。因此,世界上有许多城市-区域开放空间政策的例子,例如连接多个城市的非建成区的区域公园和绿化带。然而,目前尚不清楚这种政策如何以及为什么能够在区域政治决策中战胜经常存在激烈竞争的土地使用形式。在这篇概念论文中,我们阐述了一种理论方法来解释上述开放空间政策的采用和实施。专注于决策和规划过程,我们使用完善的多流框架(MSF),该框架最初由Kingdon开发,随后经过多年的完善和扩展。借鉴相关文献,本文将MSF应用于城市开放空间政策制定和规划领域。根据我们对框架的理解,当三个基本上独立的流程流(问题、政策和政治)在政策窗口期间由有能力的政策企业家耦合,并且随后保持这种耦合时,在该政策领域采用和实施重要政策的可能性就会增加。我们的方法超越了Kingdon最初的MSF,在分析中引入了初始阶段和实施阶段。同时,我们将空间和开放空间研究的许多过程相关方面整合到我们基于msf的理论方法中。结果总结为7个命题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Policy and Governance
Environmental Policy and Governance ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Environmental Policy and Governance is an international, inter-disciplinary journal affiliated with the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE). The journal seeks to advance interdisciplinary environmental research and its use to support novel solutions in environmental policy and governance. The journal publishes innovative, high quality articles which examine, or are relevant to, the environmental policies that are introduced by governments or the diverse forms of environmental governance that emerge in markets and civil society. The journal includes papers that examine how different forms of policy and governance emerge and exert influence at scales ranging from local to global and in diverse developmental and environmental contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书