Genomic diversity, inbreeding, and selection signatures in duroc, landrace, and yorkshire pigs from a long-term closed breeding system.

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Applied Genetics Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-03 DOI:10.1007/s13353-026-01072-9
Huangyi Tang, Henrique A Mulim, Shi-Yi Chen, Allan P Schinckel, Hongfeng-Xue, Dingjie-Qiu, Yizhan-Liu, Hinayah Rojas de Oliveira
{"title":"Genomic diversity, inbreeding, and selection signatures in duroc, landrace, and yorkshire pigs from a long-term closed breeding system.","authors":"Huangyi Tang, Henrique A Mulim, Shi-Yi Chen, Allan P Schinckel, Hongfeng-Xue, Dingjie-Qiu, Yizhan-Liu, Hinayah Rojas de Oliveira","doi":"10.1007/s13353-026-01072-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Duroc (DD), Landrace (LL), and Yorkshire (YY) are among the most widely used commercial pig breeds, having undergone intense long-term selection within closed breeding systems. This study presents a comprehensive genomic analysis of genetic diversity, inbreeding patterns, and selection signatures in DD, LL, and YY populations that have been subject to close breeding for over 15 years. Genomic and pedigree data were available for 1,088 animals (DD = 348, LL = 276, YY = 464), genotyped using the GenoBaits<sup>®</sup> Porcine 100 K SNP panel. Principal component analysis and genetic diversity metrics revealed distinct population structures among the three breeds. Pairwise genetic differentiation supported this pattern, with DD showing the greatest divergence from LL (0.34 ± 0.24) and YY (0.33 ± 0.24), while LL and YY were more closely related (FST = 0.22 ± 0.19). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis further confirmed these differences, as DD exhibited the highest average r² (0.34), followed by LL (0.28) and YY (0.25). Within-breed genetic diversity metrics, including observed heterozygosity (HO: 0.37 in DD, 0.39 in LL, 0.38 in YY), expected heterozygosity (HE: 0.36 in DD, 0.37 in LL, 0.38 in YY), and minor allele frequency (MAF: 0.27 in DD, 0.28 in LL, 0.29 in YY), indicated greater genetic variability in LL and YY compared to DD. Runs of homozygosity (ROH) analyses revealed different patterns of autozygosity, with DD exhibiting more long ROH indicative of recent inbreeding, while YY harbored a higher number of short ROH, suggestive of more ancient demographic events. ROH-based inbreeding coefficients (FROH) consistently exceeded pedigree-based estimates (FPED) across all breeds, highlighting the presence of recent or unrecorded inbreeding that pedigree data may not fully capture. According to Generation Proxy Selection Mapping (GPSM), 17, 1, and 12 significant SNPs were detected in DD, LL, and YY, respectively. Functional annotation of ROH islands and GPSM-significant loci revealed both breed-specific and overlapping QTLs related to traits such as growth, reproduction, and carcass. In general, the findings of this study contribute to a deeper understanding of the genomic consequences of long-term closed breeding and provide reference information to support consideration of breeding strategies that balance continued selection for productivity with the maintenance of genetic diversity in modern commercial pig populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14891,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"769-786"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13534200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-026-01072-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Duroc (DD), Landrace (LL), and Yorkshire (YY) are among the most widely used commercial pig breeds, having undergone intense long-term selection within closed breeding systems. This study presents a comprehensive genomic analysis of genetic diversity, inbreeding patterns, and selection signatures in DD, LL, and YY populations that have been subject to close breeding for over 15 years. Genomic and pedigree data were available for 1,088 animals (DD = 348, LL = 276, YY = 464), genotyped using the GenoBaits® Porcine 100 K SNP panel. Principal component analysis and genetic diversity metrics revealed distinct population structures among the three breeds. Pairwise genetic differentiation supported this pattern, with DD showing the greatest divergence from LL (0.34 ± 0.24) and YY (0.33 ± 0.24), while LL and YY were more closely related (FST = 0.22 ± 0.19). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis further confirmed these differences, as DD exhibited the highest average r² (0.34), followed by LL (0.28) and YY (0.25). Within-breed genetic diversity metrics, including observed heterozygosity (HO: 0.37 in DD, 0.39 in LL, 0.38 in YY), expected heterozygosity (HE: 0.36 in DD, 0.37 in LL, 0.38 in YY), and minor allele frequency (MAF: 0.27 in DD, 0.28 in LL, 0.29 in YY), indicated greater genetic variability in LL and YY compared to DD. Runs of homozygosity (ROH) analyses revealed different patterns of autozygosity, with DD exhibiting more long ROH indicative of recent inbreeding, while YY harbored a higher number of short ROH, suggestive of more ancient demographic events. ROH-based inbreeding coefficients (FROH) consistently exceeded pedigree-based estimates (FPED) across all breeds, highlighting the presence of recent or unrecorded inbreeding that pedigree data may not fully capture. According to Generation Proxy Selection Mapping (GPSM), 17, 1, and 12 significant SNPs were detected in DD, LL, and YY, respectively. Functional annotation of ROH islands and GPSM-significant loci revealed both breed-specific and overlapping QTLs related to traits such as growth, reproduction, and carcass. In general, the findings of this study contribute to a deeper understanding of the genomic consequences of long-term closed breeding and provide reference information to support consideration of breeding strategies that balance continued selection for productivity with the maintenance of genetic diversity in modern commercial pig populations.

基因组多样性,近交,和选择签名在杜洛克,长白猪,和约克郡猪从一个长期封闭的育种系统。
杜洛克(DD)、长白(LL)和约克郡(YY)是最广泛使用的商品猪品种,在封闭的育种系统中经历了长期的激烈选择。本研究对DD、LL和YY群体的遗传多样性、近交模式和选择特征进行了全面的基因组分析,这些群体已经进行了超过15年的近距离育种。1088只动物(DD = 348, LL = 276, YY = 464)的基因组和系谱数据可用,使用GenoBaits®猪100 K SNP面板进行基因分型。主成分分析和遗传多样性指标显示,3个品种的群体结构不同。配对遗传分化支持这一模式,DD与LL(0.34±0.24)和YY(0.33±0.24)的差异最大,而LL和YY的FST更接近(0.22±0.19)。连锁不平衡分析进一步证实了这些差异,DD表现出最高的平均r²(0.34),其次是LL(0.28)和YY(0.25)。品种内遗传多样性指标,包括观察到的杂合度(HO: DD为0.37,LL为0.39,YY为0.38)、预期杂合度(HE: DD为0.36,LL为0.37,YY为0.38)和次要等位基因频率(MAF:DD为0.27,LL为0.28,YY为0.29),表明LL和YY与DD相比具有更大的遗传变异性。纯合子(ROH)分析显示了不同的自合子模式,DD显示出较长的ROH,表明最近的近亲交配,而YY具有较多的较短的ROH,表明更古老的人口事件。在所有品种中,基于roh的近交系数(FROH)始终超过基于家系的估计值(FPED),突出了家系数据可能无法完全捕获的近期或未记录的近交的存在。根据代代理选择映射(GPSM), DD、LL和YY分别检测到17、1和12个显著snp。对ROH岛和gpsm显著位点的功能注释显示了与生长、繁殖和胴体等性状相关的品种特异性和重叠qtl。总的来说,本研究的发现有助于更深入地了解长期封闭育种的基因组后果,并为考虑在现代商品猪种群中持续选择生产力与维持遗传多样性之间取得平衡的育种策略提供参考信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Genetics
Journal of Applied Genetics 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Genetics is an international journal on genetics and genomics. It publishes peer-reviewed original papers, short communications (including case reports) and review articles focused on the research of applicative aspects of plant, human, animal and microbial genetics and genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书