Interventional Nerve Procedures for Pain Related to Head-and-Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.8 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Indian Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-12 DOI:10.25259/IJPC_180_2025
Alexandre Yamada Fujimura Júnior, Dayse Mirian Nunes Araujo, Jairo Pinheiro da Silva
{"title":"Interventional Nerve Procedures for Pain Related to Head-and-Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Alexandre Yamada Fujimura Júnior, Dayse Mirian Nunes Araujo, Jairo Pinheiro da Silva","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_180_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To systematically review the evidence on the use of peripheral nerve interventions, including anaesthetic blocks, neurolysis and radiofrequency techniques, for the management of cancer-related pain in patients with head-and-neck malignancies. The review aimed to assess their clinical efficacy, access routes, safety profiles and associated complications. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024564969) and conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library through July 2024. Included studies evaluated peripheral nerve interventions in head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients reporting at least one predefined outcome. Data on pain relief, duration of effect, medication use and adverse events were extracted. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools and ROB 2, depending on study design. Twenty-eight studies involving 536 patients were included. Of these, 298 received anaesthetic nerve blocks, 74 underwent neurolytic procedures, and 164 were treated with radiofrequency-based interventions. Sphenopalatine ganglion block and glossopharyngeal nerve block were the most frequently reported anaesthetic techniques, both demonstrating good efficacy and favourable safety profiles. Neurolytic procedures targeting superficial nerves (e.g., sphenopalatine, occipital, auriculotemporal) were generally effective and well tolerated. Neurolysis of the glossopharyngeal nerve showed promising results but was associated with greater anatomical risk and limited safety data. Pulsed and thermal radiofrequency (PRF/TRF) targeting the glossopharyngeal and trigeminal nerves were effective, with PRF showing a better safety profile. TRF was associated with transient dysphagia, sensory changes and reduced gag reflex. No major complications were reported across studies. However, outcomes and techniques varied widely, and most studies were case reports or small case series, often with a high ROB. Peripheral nerve interventions, particularly sphenopalatine and glossopharyngeal blocks, may be effective and safe options for pain management in HNC patients. Larger, high-quality trials are needed to confirm these findings and support broader clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":"32 2","pages":"121-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13224304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJPC_180_2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To systematically review the evidence on the use of peripheral nerve interventions, including anaesthetic blocks, neurolysis and radiofrequency techniques, for the management of cancer-related pain in patients with head-and-neck malignancies. The review aimed to assess their clinical efficacy, access routes, safety profiles and associated complications. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024564969) and conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library through July 2024. Included studies evaluated peripheral nerve interventions in head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients reporting at least one predefined outcome. Data on pain relief, duration of effect, medication use and adverse events were extracted. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools and ROB 2, depending on study design. Twenty-eight studies involving 536 patients were included. Of these, 298 received anaesthetic nerve blocks, 74 underwent neurolytic procedures, and 164 were treated with radiofrequency-based interventions. Sphenopalatine ganglion block and glossopharyngeal nerve block were the most frequently reported anaesthetic techniques, both demonstrating good efficacy and favourable safety profiles. Neurolytic procedures targeting superficial nerves (e.g., sphenopalatine, occipital, auriculotemporal) were generally effective and well tolerated. Neurolysis of the glossopharyngeal nerve showed promising results but was associated with greater anatomical risk and limited safety data. Pulsed and thermal radiofrequency (PRF/TRF) targeting the glossopharyngeal and trigeminal nerves were effective, with PRF showing a better safety profile. TRF was associated with transient dysphagia, sensory changes and reduced gag reflex. No major complications were reported across studies. However, outcomes and techniques varied widely, and most studies were case reports or small case series, often with a high ROB. Peripheral nerve interventions, particularly sphenopalatine and glossopharyngeal blocks, may be effective and safe options for pain management in HNC patients. Larger, high-quality trials are needed to confirm these findings and support broader clinical use.

介入神经手术治疗头颈癌相关疼痛:系统综述。
系统回顾使用周围神经干预的证据,包括麻醉阻滞、神经松解术和射频技术,用于头颈部恶性肿瘤患者癌症相关疼痛的管理。该综述旨在评估它们的临床疗效、获取途径、安全性和相关并发症。本系统评价在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024564969),并根据Cochrane手册和首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析指南。在PubMed, Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面的搜索,直到2024年7月。纳入的研究评估了头颈癌(HNC)患者的周围神经干预,报告了至少一个预先确定的结果。提取疼痛缓解、效果持续时间、药物使用和不良事件的数据。根据研究设计,使用Joanna Briggs研究所工具和rob2评估偏倚风险(ROB)。纳入了28项研究,涉及536例患者。其中,298人接受了麻醉神经阻滞,74人接受了神经溶解手术,164人接受了基于射频的干预。蝶腭神经节阻滞和舌咽神经阻滞是最常报道的麻醉技术,两者都显示出良好的疗效和良好的安全性。针对浅表神经(如蝶腭神经、枕神经、耳颞神经)的神经溶解手术通常有效且耐受性良好。舌咽神经松解术显示出良好的结果,但解剖学风险较大,安全性数据有限。脉冲和热射频(PRF/TRF)靶向舌咽神经和三叉神经是有效的,其中PRF显示出更好的安全性。TRF与短暂性吞咽困难、感觉改变和呕吐反射减少有关。所有研究均未发现重大并发症。然而,结果和技术差异很大,大多数研究是病例报告或小病例系列,通常具有较高的ROB。外周神经干预,特别是蝶帕丁和舌咽部阻滞,可能是HNC患者疼痛管理的有效和安全的选择。需要更大规模、高质量的试验来证实这些发现并支持更广泛的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Indian Journal of Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Indian Journal of Palliative Care. You have free full text access to recent issues of the journal. The links connect you to •guidelines and systematic reviews in palliative care and oncology •a directory of palliative care programmes in India and IAPC membership •Palliative Care Formulary, book reviews and other educational material •guidance on statistical tests and medical writing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书