Office Hysteroscopy: Treating Intrauterine Pathology and Avoiding the Operating Room.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Sun Woo Kim, Ali Antoine, Lauren Cosgriff, Clarissa Diniz, Kari Plewniak, Mark Levie
{"title":"Office Hysteroscopy: Treating Intrauterine Pathology and Avoiding the Operating Room.","authors":"Sun Woo Kim, Ali Antoine, Lauren Cosgriff, Clarissa Diniz, Kari Plewniak, Mark Levie","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2026.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Office hysteroscopy is a versatile minimally invasive procedure. However, there are limited data reporting long-term follow-up of patients undergoing these procedures. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the rate of additional procedures performed in 1 and 3 years following office hysteroscopy, and to evaluate how frequently full assessment of the uterine cavity could be performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all office hysteroscopies that were performed between July 2015 and December 2021. Chart review was performed to extract patient demographic data, medical history, office hysteroscopy procedural data, pathology results, and any subsequent gynecological surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 13% of patients required further gynecologic intervention in the operating room (OR) within 1 year and 16% required further intervention in the OR within 3 years. A total of 82.7% of polyps and 90% of retained foreign bodies, were successfully removed in the office. A total of 93.4% had an adequate diagnostic office hysteroscopy with full evaluation of intrauterine cavity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports that office hysteroscopy is an effective approach that helps patients avoid the OR with the ability to perform an excellent diagnostic procedure and to treat common pathology. While patients with more advanced pathology may end up in the OR, office hysteroscopy can aid in planning the appropriate approach and procedure to be performed for more complex cases. Most our patients did not need an OR procedure in the 3 years following office hysteroscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"30 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13224334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2026.00015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Office hysteroscopy is a versatile minimally invasive procedure. However, there are limited data reporting long-term follow-up of patients undergoing these procedures. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the rate of additional procedures performed in 1 and 3 years following office hysteroscopy, and to evaluate how frequently full assessment of the uterine cavity could be performed.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all office hysteroscopies that were performed between July 2015 and December 2021. Chart review was performed to extract patient demographic data, medical history, office hysteroscopy procedural data, pathology results, and any subsequent gynecological surgery.

Results: Only 13% of patients required further gynecologic intervention in the operating room (OR) within 1 year and 16% required further intervention in the OR within 3 years. A total of 82.7% of polyps and 90% of retained foreign bodies, were successfully removed in the office. A total of 93.4% had an adequate diagnostic office hysteroscopy with full evaluation of intrauterine cavity.

Conclusion: This study supports that office hysteroscopy is an effective approach that helps patients avoid the OR with the ability to perform an excellent diagnostic procedure and to treat common pathology. While patients with more advanced pathology may end up in the OR, office hysteroscopy can aid in planning the appropriate approach and procedure to be performed for more complex cases. Most our patients did not need an OR procedure in the 3 years following office hysteroscopy.

办公室宫腔镜:治疗宫内病理和避免手术室。
背景和目的:宫腔镜是一种多功能的微创手术。然而,对接受这些手术的患者进行长期随访的数据报道有限。本研究的目的是评估在宫腔镜检查后1年和3年内进行额外手术的比率,以及评估对子宫腔进行全面评估的频率。方法:这是一项对2015年7月至2021年12月期间进行的所有宫腔镜的单中心回顾性横断面分析。进行图表回顾,以提取患者人口统计资料、病史、宫腔镜手术资料、病理结果和任何后续妇科手术。结果:1年内仅13%的患者需要在手术室进行进一步妇科干预,3年内仅16%的患者需要在手术室进行进一步干预。共82.7%的息肉和90%的残留异物在办公室被成功切除。93.4%的患者接受了宫腔镜检查,并对宫腔进行了充分的评估。结论:本研究支持宫腔镜是一种有效的方法,可以帮助患者避免进入手术室,并能进行良好的诊断和治疗常见的病理。而更严重的病理患者可能最终在手术室,办公室宫腔镜可以帮助计划适当的方法和程序,以执行更复杂的情况。我们的大多数患者在宫腔镜检查后的3年内不需要手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书