General Perceptions of Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of ACL Tears Using an Online Survey Platform.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Robert S Dean, Tanner J Hafen, Ryan McNassor, Leonardo Cavinatto, Conor M Dolson, Kevin X Farley, Betina B Hinckel
{"title":"General Perceptions of Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of ACL Tears Using an Online Survey Platform.","authors":"Robert S Dean, Tanner J Hafen, Ryan McNassor, Leonardo Cavinatto, Conor M Dolson, Kevin X Farley, Betina B Hinckel","doi":"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the general population's perceptions of conservative treatment compared with surgical intervention for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey study analyzing public opinions on ACL treatment approaches.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A 44-question survey constructed by the current authors.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants were recruited from a web-based survey that was developed using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a validated online crowd source platform. This study recruited adult participants ≥18 years of age and those residing in the United States.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Demographic data, prior exposure to ACL injuries, and preferences for surgical versus nonsurgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Independent variables: </strong>Demographic, educational, vocational, and prior surgical variables were collected.</p><p><strong>Resultsintotal,: </strong>529 participants were included with mean age of 43.4 ± 12.5 years. A total of 38.5% of respondents preferred surgical treatment, while 61.5% chose nonoperative care. Among competitive athletes, 73.6% favored surgery compared with only 25.7% of nonathletes who preferred operative treatment (P < 0.01). Physician recommendations significantly influenced decisions, with 76.7% of participants stating they would follow their surgeon's advice if they initially preferred surgery but were recommended to surgery by their surgeon. The main reasons for choosing surgery were concerns for long-term joint health and the desire to return to high-level activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Public perception of ACL injury management is influenced by athletic participation, trust in medical professionals, and concerns about surgery. These findings highlight the need for enhanced patient education and shared decision making to align treatment choices with individual goals and clinical outcomes. Future research should explore targeted educational interventions and their impact on treatment preferences, particularly in younger, high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10355,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001470","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the general population's perceptions of conservative treatment compared with surgical intervention for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears.

Design: Cross-sectional survey study analyzing public opinions on ACL treatment approaches.

Setting: A 44-question survey constructed by the current authors.

Participants: Participants were recruited from a web-based survey that was developed using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a validated online crowd source platform. This study recruited adult participants ≥18 years of age and those residing in the United States.

Main outcome measures: Demographic data, prior exposure to ACL injuries, and preferences for surgical versus nonsurgical treatment.

Independent variables: Demographic, educational, vocational, and prior surgical variables were collected.

Resultsintotal,: 529 participants were included with mean age of 43.4 ± 12.5 years. A total of 38.5% of respondents preferred surgical treatment, while 61.5% chose nonoperative care. Among competitive athletes, 73.6% favored surgery compared with only 25.7% of nonathletes who preferred operative treatment (P < 0.01). Physician recommendations significantly influenced decisions, with 76.7% of participants stating they would follow their surgeon's advice if they initially preferred surgery but were recommended to surgery by their surgeon. The main reasons for choosing surgery were concerns for long-term joint health and the desire to return to high-level activity.

Conclusions: Public perception of ACL injury management is influenced by athletic participation, trust in medical professionals, and concerns about surgery. These findings highlight the need for enhanced patient education and shared decision making to align treatment choices with individual goals and clinical outcomes. Future research should explore targeted educational interventions and their impact on treatment preferences, particularly in younger, high-risk populations.

使用在线调查平台对前交叉韧带撕裂手术与非手术治疗的一般看法。
目的:本研究旨在评估普通人群对前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂的保守治疗与手术治疗的看法。设计:横断面调查研究,分析公众对前交叉韧带治疗方法的意见。设置:由现任作者构建的44个问题的调查。参与者:参与者是从基于网络的调查中招募的,该调查是使用亚马逊土耳其机械(MTurk)开发的,这是一个经过验证的在线人群资源平台。本研究招募年龄≥18岁且居住在美国的成年参与者。主要结局指标:人口统计数据,前交叉韧带损伤暴露,手术与非手术治疗的偏好。自变量:收集人口统计、教育、职业和既往手术变量。结果共纳入529例,平均年龄43.4±12.5岁。38.5%的受访者选择手术治疗,61.5%的受访者选择非手术治疗。在竞技运动员中,73.6%的人选择手术治疗,而非运动员中只有25.7%的人选择手术治疗(P < 0.01)。医生的建议对决定有显著影响,76.7%的参与者表示,如果他们最初倾向于手术,但被外科医生推荐手术,他们会听从外科医生的建议。选择手术的主要原因是考虑到长期的关节健康和重返高水平活动的愿望。结论:公众对前交叉韧带损伤管理的认知受运动参与、对医疗专业人员的信任和对手术的担忧的影响。这些发现强调了加强患者教育和共同决策的必要性,以使治疗选择与个人目标和临床结果保持一致。未来的研究应该探索有针对性的教育干预及其对治疗偏好的影响,特别是在年轻、高风险人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine is an international refereed journal published for clinicians with a primary interest in sports medicine practice. The journal publishes original research and reviews covering diagnostics, therapeutics, and rehabilitation in healthy and physically challenged individuals of all ages and levels of sport and exercise participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书