Personalized Digital Health Solutions to Increasing Diabetes-Related Knowledge and Behavioral Outcomes: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine
JMIR Diabetes Pub Date : 2026-06-01 DOI:10.2196/87364
Marcia Ory, Christi H Esquivel, Gang Han, Samuel D Castiglione Towne, SangNam Ahn, Matthew Lee Smith
{"title":"Personalized Digital Health Solutions to Increasing Diabetes-Related Knowledge and Behavioral Outcomes: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Marcia Ory, Christi H Esquivel, Gang Han, Samuel D Castiglione Towne, SangNam Ahn, Matthew Lee Smith","doi":"10.2196/87364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of diabetes in the United States necessitates investigations into how to better enable adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to manage their health using easy-to-access and personally adaptable technologies. The ubiquity of digital content further justifies the need to consider the impact of different digital intervention modalities in diabetes self-care activities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the impact of 2 digital diabetes self-care education programs delivered separately and in combination to adults with T2DM across various settings in Texas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial in Texas with 188 adults with T2DM to assess whether 2 different interventions alone (Virtual Making Moves with Diabetes or Technology-Based Education and Support) or in combination (Virtual Making Moves with Diabetes followed by Technology-Based Education and Support) improved multiple outcomes associated with diabetes self-management. We used several estimation techniques, including generalized estimating equations, to account for multiple factors simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 3 digital intervention modalities led to statistically significant improvements in diabetes-related confidence, distress, and self-care behaviors, with significance from baseline through 6 months and supported by moderate to strong effect sizes (Cohen d) ranging from 0.446 to 0.827 at 3-month follow-up versus baseline and from 0.538 to 0.888 at 6-month follow-up versus baseline. No statistically significant superiority was observed among the intervention modalities. Higher self-care behaviors were significantly associated with higher baseline confidence and lower distress. Those in the most disadvantaged positions (less education, less financial stability, and no health insurance) showed significantly larger improvement in self-care behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the benefits associated with this study's interventions, we suggest future work to further develop digital content that can be tailored to individuals with T2DM to help them manage their chronic conditions in a cost-effective manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":52371,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Diabetes","volume":"11 ","pages":"e87364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13225500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/87364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of diabetes in the United States necessitates investigations into how to better enable adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to manage their health using easy-to-access and personally adaptable technologies. The ubiquity of digital content further justifies the need to consider the impact of different digital intervention modalities in diabetes self-care activities.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the impact of 2 digital diabetes self-care education programs delivered separately and in combination to adults with T2DM across various settings in Texas.

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in Texas with 188 adults with T2DM to assess whether 2 different interventions alone (Virtual Making Moves with Diabetes or Technology-Based Education and Support) or in combination (Virtual Making Moves with Diabetes followed by Technology-Based Education and Support) improved multiple outcomes associated with diabetes self-management. We used several estimation techniques, including generalized estimating equations, to account for multiple factors simultaneously.

Results: All 3 digital intervention modalities led to statistically significant improvements in diabetes-related confidence, distress, and self-care behaviors, with significance from baseline through 6 months and supported by moderate to strong effect sizes (Cohen d) ranging from 0.446 to 0.827 at 3-month follow-up versus baseline and from 0.538 to 0.888 at 6-month follow-up versus baseline. No statistically significant superiority was observed among the intervention modalities. Higher self-care behaviors were significantly associated with higher baseline confidence and lower distress. Those in the most disadvantaged positions (less education, less financial stability, and no health insurance) showed significantly larger improvement in self-care behaviors.

Conclusions: Given the benefits associated with this study's interventions, we suggest future work to further develop digital content that can be tailored to individuals with T2DM to help them manage their chronic conditions in a cost-effective manner.

个性化数字健康解决方案增加糖尿病相关知识和行为结果:来自一项随机对照试验的结果
背景:糖尿病在美国的流行需要研究如何更好地使成人2型糖尿病患者(T2DM)管理他们的健康使用易于获得和个人适应的技术。数字内容的无处不在进一步证明有必要考虑不同数字干预方式对糖尿病自我保健活动的影响。目的:本研究旨在比较两种数字化糖尿病自我保健教育项目对德克萨斯州不同环境的成人2型糖尿病患者的影响。方法:我们在德克萨斯州对188名成年T2DM患者进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估两种不同的干预措施(糖尿病患者虚拟运动或基于技术的教育和支持)或联合干预(糖尿病患者虚拟运动后进行基于技术的教育和支持)是否能改善与糖尿病自我管理相关的多种结果。我们使用了几种估计技术,包括广义估计方程,来同时考虑多个因素。结果:所有3种数字干预方式在糖尿病相关的信心、痛苦和自我护理行为方面都有统计学意义的改善,从基线到6个月都有显著性,并得到中等到强效应量(Cohen d)的支持,3个月随访时与基线相比为0.446至0.827,6个月随访时与基线相比为0.538至0.888。干预方式之间没有统计学上的显著优势。较高的自我照顾行为与较高的基线自信和较低的痛苦显著相关。那些处于最不利地位的人(教育程度较低、经济状况不稳定、没有医疗保险)在自我保健行为方面表现出了显著更大的改善。结论:鉴于本研究干预措施的益处,我们建议未来进一步开发针对2型糖尿病患者的数字内容,以帮助他们以具有成本效益的方式管理慢性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Diabetes
JMIR Diabetes Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书