Efficacy of Physical Modalities for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain After Stroke: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-02 DOI:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000562
Stefania Spina, Salvatore Facciorusso, Milena Carmela D'Ascanio, Mirko Filippetti, Marco Battaglia, Alessio Baricich, Alessandro Picelli, Andrea Santamato
{"title":"Efficacy of Physical Modalities for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain After Stroke: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Stefania Spina, Salvatore Facciorusso, Milena Carmela D'Ascanio, Mirko Filippetti, Marco Battaglia, Alessio Baricich, Alessandro Picelli, Andrea Santamato","doi":"10.1097/NPT.0000000000000562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) represents a common and disabling complication following stroke, which has multiple causes and important functional consequences. Physical modalities are frequently used to manage HSP, but evidence on their effectiveness remains inconsistent. Our aim is to systematically review the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of physical modalities, compared with sham or standard care, for improving pain and function in adults with poststroke HSP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane Guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We included RCTs assessing physical modalities versus sham or standard therapy in adult stroke survivors with HSP. The primary outcome was pain reduction; secondary outcomes included functional mobility, quality of life, and adverse events. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PEDro, CINAHL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov , and World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) up to July 30, 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve RCTs involving 567 participants were included. Interventions comprised electrotherapy (n = 6), shock wave therapy (n = 3), and laser therapy (n = 3). Most studies showed significant pain reduction compared with control. Electrotherapy provided sustained analgesia; extracorporeal shock wave therapy improved structural abnormalities and pain; laser therapy enhanced both pain and functional outcomes. Adverse events were mostly mild. However, safety conclusions are limited by incomplete and inconsistent adverse event reporting. Heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes precluded meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Based on low to very low certainty evidence, physical modalities may offer benefit for HSP, but uncertainty remains regarding both long-term effectiveness and safety. Integration into multimodal rehabilitation protocols may be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":49030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"260-273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13592833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) represents a common and disabling complication following stroke, which has multiple causes and important functional consequences. Physical modalities are frequently used to manage HSP, but evidence on their effectiveness remains inconsistent. Our aim is to systematically review the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of physical modalities, compared with sham or standard care, for improving pain and function in adults with poststroke HSP.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane Guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We included RCTs assessing physical modalities versus sham or standard therapy in adult stroke survivors with HSP. The primary outcome was pain reduction; secondary outcomes included functional mobility, quality of life, and adverse events. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PEDro, CINAHL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov , and World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) up to July 30, 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.

Results: Twelve RCTs involving 567 participants were included. Interventions comprised electrotherapy (n = 6), shock wave therapy (n = 3), and laser therapy (n = 3). Most studies showed significant pain reduction compared with control. Electrotherapy provided sustained analgesia; extracorporeal shock wave therapy improved structural abnormalities and pain; laser therapy enhanced both pain and functional outcomes. Adverse events were mostly mild. However, safety conclusions are limited by incomplete and inconsistent adverse event reporting. Heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes precluded meta-analysis.

Discussion and conclusions: Based on low to very low certainty evidence, physical modalities may offer benefit for HSP, but uncertainty remains regarding both long-term effectiveness and safety. Integration into multimodal rehabilitation protocols may be considered.

物理方式对中风后偏瘫肩痛的疗效:一项系统综述。
背景和目的:偏瘫性肩痛(HSP)是卒中后常见的致残并发症,有多种原因和重要的功能后果。物理模式经常用于管理HSP,但其有效性的证据仍然不一致。我们的目的是系统地回顾随机对照试验(rct)的证据,与假治疗或标准治疗相比,物理治疗方式对改善中风后HSP成人疼痛和功能的有效性和安全性。方法:本系统评价遵循Cochrane指南和首选系统评价报告项目和荟萃分析声明进行。我们纳入了评估HSP成年中风幸存者物理治疗与假治疗或标准治疗的随机对照试验。主要结局是疼痛减轻;次要结局包括功能活动能力、生活质量和不良事件。在MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL、PEDro、CINAHL、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(WHO ICTRP)中进行了全面的检索,截止到2025年7月30日。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具2评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入12项随机对照试验,共567名受试者。干预措施包括电疗(n = 6)、冲击波治疗(n = 3)和激光治疗(n = 3)。大多数研究显示,与对照组相比,疼痛明显减轻。电疗提供持续的镇痛;体外冲击波治疗可改善结构异常和疼痛;激光治疗改善了疼痛和功能预后。不良事件大多是轻微的。然而,安全性结论受到不完整和不一致的不良事件报告的限制。干预措施和结果的异质性妨碍了meta分析。讨论和结论:基于低到极低的确定性证据,物理治疗可能对HSP有益,但长期有效性和安全性仍存在不确定性。可以考虑将其纳入多模式康复方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy (JNPT) is an indexed resource for dissemination of research-based evidence related to neurologic physical therapy intervention. High standards of quality are maintained through a rigorous, double-blinded, peer-review process and adherence to standards recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. With an international editorial board made up of preeminent researchers and clinicians, JNPT publishes articles of global relevance for examination, evaluation, prognosis, intervention, and outcomes for individuals with movement deficits due to neurologic conditions. Through systematic reviews, research articles, case studies, and clinical perspectives, JNPT promotes the integration of evidence into theory, education, research, and practice of neurologic physical therapy, spanning the continuum from pathophysiology to societal participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书