Surgical approaches for the treatment of posterior malleolar fracture: which one to choose?

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Enrique Fernández-Rojas, Lily Fletcher, Mario Herrera-Pérez, Jesús Vilá-Rico
{"title":"Surgical approaches for the treatment of posterior malleolar fracture: which one to choose?","authors":"Enrique Fernández-Rojas, Lily Fletcher, Mario Herrera-Pérez, Jesús Vilá-Rico","doi":"10.1530/EOR-2025-0157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence suggests that posterior approaches may be superior to the anterior percutaneous approach in terms of reduction quality and functional outcomes. There is no consensus regarding the definition of the posteromedial approach and its modifications, which can cause confusion when evaluating outcomes. Several variables must be considered when choosing a surgical approach, with particular importance given to the morphology of the posterior malleolus fracture, the presence of a complex fibula fracture, and the presence of Tillaux-Chaput or Le Fort-Wagstaffe fractures. This article provides an overview of approaches to posterior malleolus fractures and presents recommendations for approach selection in specific clinical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"11 6","pages":"464-469"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13240627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2025-0157","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence suggests that posterior approaches may be superior to the anterior percutaneous approach in terms of reduction quality and functional outcomes. There is no consensus regarding the definition of the posteromedial approach and its modifications, which can cause confusion when evaluating outcomes. Several variables must be considered when choosing a surgical approach, with particular importance given to the morphology of the posterior malleolus fracture, the presence of a complex fibula fracture, and the presence of Tillaux-Chaput or Le Fort-Wagstaffe fractures. This article provides an overview of approaches to posterior malleolus fractures and presents recommendations for approach selection in specific clinical scenarios.

治疗后踝骨折的手术入路:选择哪一种?
有证据表明,就复位质量和功能结果而言,后路入路可能优于前路经皮入路。关于后内侧入路的定义及其修改尚无共识,这可能导致评估结果时的混乱。在选择手术入路时,必须考虑几个变量,特别要考虑后踝骨折的形态、是否存在复杂的腓骨骨折以及是否存在Tillaux-Chaput或Le Fort-Wagstaffe骨折。本文概述了后踝骨折的入路,并提出了在特定临床情况下选择入路的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书