Diagnostic pathways for lung cancer patients in Denmark: General practice events, first referral and stage at diagnosis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Dorte Ejg Jarbøl, Peter Haastrup, Sanne Rasmussen, Gitte Bruun Lauridsen, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Linda Juel Ahrenfeldt, Jesper Lykkegaard, Lisa Maria Sele Sætre
{"title":"Diagnostic pathways for lung cancer patients in Denmark: General practice events, first referral and stage at diagnosis.","authors":"Dorte Ejg Jarbøl, Peter Haastrup, Sanne Rasmussen, Gitte Bruun Lauridsen, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Linda Juel Ahrenfeldt, Jesper Lykkegaard, Lisa Maria Sele Sætre","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2026.45851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>This study examined lung cancer patients' diagnostic pathways, focusing on first healthcare contact, general practice events, referral choice, and stage at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>General practices in three Danish regions participated in a retrospective survey of medical records for patients diagnosed with lung cancer between March 2019 and February 2021. General practitioners completed a questionnaire on initial contact, symptom presentation, diagnostic events and first referral. Socioeconomic data and tumor stage were retrieved from national registers. Associations between symptom presentation and diagnostic events were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1069 patients, 72% had initial contact in general practice, 22% at a hospital and 5% with out-of-hours care. Of patients starting in general practice (n = 766), 36% presented specific cancer symptoms, 48% non-specific symptoms, 9% both and 7% were asymptomatic. Diagnostic events included hesitation to seek care (10%), declining investigation or non-adherence (4%) and initial management for another disease (33%). Men were more likely to decline investigation or fail to follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 4.32; 95% confidence interval 1.75-10.65). Non-specific symptoms increased the odds of referral for another condition (OR 1.48) or another cancer type (OR 2.99). Most patients were first referred to imaging (48%), whereas 16% entered a cancer care pathway and 18% were acutely hospitalised. Advanced stage was common (80%) and more likely among acutely hospitalised patients (OR 2.68).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Most lung cancer patients present first in general practice. Non-specific symptoms are frequent and pose challenges for timely diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"65 ","pages":"525-534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13234914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2026.45851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: This study examined lung cancer patients' diagnostic pathways, focusing on first healthcare contact, general practice events, referral choice, and stage at diagnosis.

Patients and methods: General practices in three Danish regions participated in a retrospective survey of medical records for patients diagnosed with lung cancer between March 2019 and February 2021. General practitioners completed a questionnaire on initial contact, symptom presentation, diagnostic events and first referral. Socioeconomic data and tumor stage were retrieved from national registers. Associations between symptom presentation and diagnostic events were analysed.

Results: Among 1069 patients, 72% had initial contact in general practice, 22% at a hospital and 5% with out-of-hours care. Of patients starting in general practice (n = 766), 36% presented specific cancer symptoms, 48% non-specific symptoms, 9% both and 7% were asymptomatic. Diagnostic events included hesitation to seek care (10%), declining investigation or non-adherence (4%) and initial management for another disease (33%). Men were more likely to decline investigation or fail to follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 4.32; 95% confidence interval 1.75-10.65). Non-specific symptoms increased the odds of referral for another condition (OR 1.48) or another cancer type (OR 2.99). Most patients were first referred to imaging (48%), whereas 16% entered a cancer care pathway and 18% were acutely hospitalised. Advanced stage was common (80%) and more likely among acutely hospitalised patients (OR 2.68).

Interpretation: Most lung cancer patients present first in general practice. Non-specific symptoms are frequent and pose challenges for timely diagnosis.

丹麦肺癌患者的诊断途径:一般实践事件,首次转诊和诊断阶段。
背景和目的:本研究考察了肺癌患者的诊断途径,重点关注首次医疗保健接触、全科医生事件、转诊选择和诊断阶段。患者和方法:丹麦三个地区的全科医生参与了2019年3月至2021年2月期间诊断为肺癌的患者医疗记录的回顾性调查。全科医生填写了一份关于初次接触、症状表现、诊断事件和首次转诊的问卷。社会经济数据和肿瘤分期从国家登记册中检索。分析了症状表现与诊断事件之间的关系。结果:在1069名患者中,72%在全科就诊,22%在医院就诊,5%在非工作时间就诊。在全科就诊的患者中(n = 766), 36%出现特异性癌症症状,48%出现非特异性症状,9%两者都有,7%无症状。诊断事件包括犹豫求医(10%),减少调查或不遵守(4%)以及对其他疾病的初始管理(33%)。男性更有可能拒绝调查或未能随访(优势比[or] 4.32; 95%可信区间1.75-10.65)。非特异性症状增加转诊为其他疾病(OR为1.48)或其他癌症类型(OR为2.99)的几率。大多数患者首先进行影像学检查(48%),而16%进入癌症治疗途径,18%急性住院。晚期很常见(80%),在急性住院患者中更常见(OR 2.68)。解释:大多数肺癌患者首先在全科就诊。非特异性症状频繁出现,对及时诊断构成挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书