The Stress-Buffering Effect of Social Support on Socio-Economic Disparities in Mental Health among Cancer Survivors.

IF 6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psychosocial Intervention Pub Date : 2026-05-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.5093/pi2026a9
Dafina Petrova, Daniel Redondo-Sánchez, Blanca Madrid Pérez-Esparza, Pablo Fernández-Navarro, Mitti Blakoe, Raquel Luque Caro, Maria-José Sánchez
{"title":"The Stress-Buffering Effect of Social Support on Socio-Economic Disparities in Mental Health among Cancer Survivors.","authors":"Dafina Petrova, Daniel Redondo-Sánchez, Blanca Madrid Pérez-Esparza, Pablo Fernández-Navarro, Mitti Blakoe, Raquel Luque Caro, Maria-José Sánchez","doi":"10.5093/pi2026a9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low socio-economic status (SES) is considered a major chronic stressor and is frequently associated with worse mental health among cancer survivors. We investigated the extent to which social support could mitigate the negative impact of low SES on the mental health of individuals with a history of cancer.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were cancer survivors identified in two nationally representative surveys conducted in Spain in 2017 (n = 1,143) and 2023 (n = 980). SES was measured with the social class index of the Spanish Society of Epidemiology. Social support was measured with the Duke-UNC questionnaire and the Oslo Social Support Scale. Mental health outcomes included psychological distress (General Health Questionnaire-12), mental well-being (WHO-5 Index), and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8). The moderating role of social support was examined in a multiple regression framework, complemented by generalized additive models to capture potential non-linear effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mental health vulnerability was highest among individuals with low levels of social support, where no SES-related differences were observed. Under medium social support, low SES was linked to higher psychological distress (B = 0.24, 95% confidence intervals, CI [0.05, 0.42]), lower mental well-being (B = -6.08 [-1.98, -10.18]), and higher rates of depression (OR = 2.78 [1.52, 5.00]). High social support buffered this effect, improving mental health among cancer survivors with low SES and reducing SES differences. Sub-group analyses revealed that this buffering effect was less evident among women, for whom inequalities persisted regardless of social support levels.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>High social support consistently attenuated SES disparities across three different mental health outcomes, albeit less effectively among women.</p>","PeriodicalId":51641,"journal":{"name":"Psychosocial Intervention","volume":"35 ","pages":"e260817"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13216956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosocial Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/pi2026a9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low socio-economic status (SES) is considered a major chronic stressor and is frequently associated with worse mental health among cancer survivors. We investigated the extent to which social support could mitigate the negative impact of low SES on the mental health of individuals with a history of cancer.

Method: Participants were cancer survivors identified in two nationally representative surveys conducted in Spain in 2017 (n = 1,143) and 2023 (n = 980). SES was measured with the social class index of the Spanish Society of Epidemiology. Social support was measured with the Duke-UNC questionnaire and the Oslo Social Support Scale. Mental health outcomes included psychological distress (General Health Questionnaire-12), mental well-being (WHO-5 Index), and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8). The moderating role of social support was examined in a multiple regression framework, complemented by generalized additive models to capture potential non-linear effects.

Results: Mental health vulnerability was highest among individuals with low levels of social support, where no SES-related differences were observed. Under medium social support, low SES was linked to higher psychological distress (B = 0.24, 95% confidence intervals, CI [0.05, 0.42]), lower mental well-being (B = -6.08 [-1.98, -10.18]), and higher rates of depression (OR = 2.78 [1.52, 5.00]). High social support buffered this effect, improving mental health among cancer survivors with low SES and reducing SES differences. Sub-group analyses revealed that this buffering effect was less evident among women, for whom inequalities persisted regardless of social support levels.

Discussion: High social support consistently attenuated SES disparities across three different mental health outcomes, albeit less effectively among women.

社会支持对癌症幸存者心理健康社会经济差异的压力缓冲作用
背景:低社会经济地位(SES)被认为是一个主要的慢性压力源,并且经常与癌症幸存者较差的心理健康有关。我们调查了社会支持在多大程度上可以减轻低社会经济地位对癌症病史个体心理健康的负面影响。方法:参与者是2017年(n = 1143)和2023年(n = 980)在西班牙进行的两项具有全国代表性的调查中确定的癌症幸存者。SES用西班牙流行病学学会的社会阶层指数来衡量。社会支持采用Duke-UNC问卷和Oslo社会支持量表进行测量。心理健康结果包括心理困扰(一般健康问卷-12)、心理健康(世卫组织-5指数)和抑郁(患者健康问卷-8)。在多元回归框架中考察了社会支持的调节作用,并辅以广义加性模型来捕捉潜在的非线性效应。结果:在社会支持水平较低的个体中,心理健康脆弱性最高,但没有观察到与ses相关的差异。在中等社会支持下,低经济地位与较高的心理困扰(B = 0.24, 95%可信区间,CI[0.05, 0.42])、较低的心理幸福感(B = -6.08[-1.98, -10.18])和较高的抑郁症发生率(OR = 2.78[1.52, 5.00])相关。高社会支持缓冲了这种影响,改善了社会地位低的癌症幸存者的心理健康,减少了社会地位差异。亚组分析显示,这种缓冲作用在女性中不太明显,对她们来说,无论社会支持水平如何,不平等都持续存在。讨论:高社会支持持续地减弱了三种不同心理健康结果的社会地位差异,尽管在女性中效果较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychosocial Intervention
Psychosocial Intervention PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychosocial Intervention is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes papers in all areas relevant to psychosocial intervention at the individual, family, social networks, organization, community, and population levels. The Journal emphasizes an evidence-based perspective and welcomes papers reporting original basic and applied research, program evaluation, and intervention results. The journal will also feature integrative reviews, and specialized papers on theoretical advances and methodological issues. Psychosocial Intervention is committed to advance knowledge, and to provide scientific evidence informing psychosocial interventions tackling social and community problems, and promoting social welfare and quality of life. Psychosocial Intervention welcomes contributions from all areas of psychology and allied disciplines, such as sociology, social work, social epidemiology, and public health. Psychosocial Intervention aims to be international in scope, and will publish papers both in Spanish and English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书