Metal artifact reduction in maxillofacial bone imaging with dental restorations: efficacy of the MRI pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition sequence versus CT.

IF 1.6 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s12194-026-01069-3
Yuji Kurosawa, Mai Kim, Keisuke Suzuki, Kouichi Ujita, Daisuke Ozaki, Hiromi Hirasawa, Takayuki Suto, Satoshi Yokoo, Yoshito Tsushima
{"title":"Metal artifact reduction in maxillofacial bone imaging with dental restorations: efficacy of the MRI pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition sequence versus CT.","authors":"Yuji Kurosawa, Mai Kim, Keisuke Suzuki, Kouichi Ujita, Daisuke Ozaki, Hiromi Hirasawa, Takayuki Suto, Satoshi Yokoo, Yoshito Tsushima","doi":"10.1007/s12194-026-01069-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pointwise Encoding Time Reduction with Radial Acquisition (PETRA) is an ultra-short echo time (UTE) MRI sequence that effectively reduces metal artifacts. Although UTE-MRI is useful for maxillofacial bone imaging, its metal artifact reduction (MAR) effectiveness has not been directly compared with computed tomography (CT) in the same patient cohort. This study evaluated the MAR effectiveness of routine CT (without MAR algorithms) and the PETRA sequence in bone assessments of the maxilla and mandible in patients with dental restorations. Thirty-one patients with dental restorations underwent both routine CT and PETRA. Two observers independently assessed metal artifact severity using a four-point visual scale (0-3) across five anatomical planes: two in the maxilla, two in the mandible, and the occlusal plane (OP). Median scores, inter-observer agreement (weighted kappa), and the relationship between the number of dental restorations and artifact severity were analyzed. Overall, artifact scores for the PETRA sequence tended to be lower than those for routine CT. At the OP, PETRA scores were significantly lower than routine CT for both observers (p < 0.01), yielding scores of 0 or 1 in over 80% of cases. For PETRA, no strong correlation was found between the number of restorations and artifact severity, consistently showing minimal artifacts regardless of the restoration count. PETRA was more effective than routine CT in reducing metal artifacts for maxillofacial bone assessment, particularly at the OP. PETRA's superior bone visualization suggests its potential as a valuable complementary tool for evaluating jawbone conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"970-977"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-026-01069-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pointwise Encoding Time Reduction with Radial Acquisition (PETRA) is an ultra-short echo time (UTE) MRI sequence that effectively reduces metal artifacts. Although UTE-MRI is useful for maxillofacial bone imaging, its metal artifact reduction (MAR) effectiveness has not been directly compared with computed tomography (CT) in the same patient cohort. This study evaluated the MAR effectiveness of routine CT (without MAR algorithms) and the PETRA sequence in bone assessments of the maxilla and mandible in patients with dental restorations. Thirty-one patients with dental restorations underwent both routine CT and PETRA. Two observers independently assessed metal artifact severity using a four-point visual scale (0-3) across five anatomical planes: two in the maxilla, two in the mandible, and the occlusal plane (OP). Median scores, inter-observer agreement (weighted kappa), and the relationship between the number of dental restorations and artifact severity were analyzed. Overall, artifact scores for the PETRA sequence tended to be lower than those for routine CT. At the OP, PETRA scores were significantly lower than routine CT for both observers (p < 0.01), yielding scores of 0 or 1 in over 80% of cases. For PETRA, no strong correlation was found between the number of restorations and artifact severity, consistently showing minimal artifacts regardless of the restoration count. PETRA was more effective than routine CT in reducing metal artifacts for maxillofacial bone assessment, particularly at the OP. PETRA's superior bone visualization suggests its potential as a valuable complementary tool for evaluating jawbone conditions.

牙齿修复颌面骨成像中的金属伪影减少:与CT相比,MRI点对径向采集序列编码时间减少的效果。
点对编码时间减少与径向采集(PETRA)是一个超短回波时间(UTE) MRI序列,有效地减少金属伪影。尽管UTE-MRI对颌面骨成像有用,但在同一患者队列中,其金属伪影减少(MAR)的有效性尚未与计算机断层扫描(CT)直接比较。本研究评估了常规CT(无MAR算法)和PETRA序列在牙齿修复患者上颌和下颌骨骨评估中的有效性。31例患者行常规CT和PETRA检查。两名观察员使用4点视觉量表(0-3)在五个解剖平面上独立评估金属伪影严重程度:两个在上颌骨,两个在下颌骨和咬合平面(OP)。分析中位数评分、观察者间一致性(加权kappa)以及牙齿修复体数量与假体严重程度之间的关系。总的来说,PETRA序列的伪影评分往往低于常规CT。在OP时,两名观察者的PETRA评分均显著低于常规CT (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书