Morgan Gaither, Madeline Petrikas, Alexandra MacHugh, Joshua Crapps, Fiorella Yep Mendizabal, Dimitrios Miserlis, Tatiana Cardenas, Carlos Brown, Pedro Teixeira, Joseph DuBose
{"title":"Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury in the Geriatric Population: Results from the Aortic Trauma Foundation.","authors":"Morgan Gaither, Madeline Petrikas, Alexandra MacHugh, Joshua Crapps, Fiorella Yep Mendizabal, Dimitrios Miserlis, Tatiana Cardenas, Carlos Brown, Pedro Teixeira, Joseph DuBose","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000002051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is evolving as the trauma population ages, yet the impact of age on treatment patterns and outcomes remains incompletely defined.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the Aortic Trauma Foundation registry (November 2016 to November 2023) identified 823 patients with BTAI, including 118 geriatric patients (65 years and older). Demographics, injury characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes were compared between the geriatric and younger (younger than 65 years) cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Geriatric patients more frequently presented after falls (17.8% vs 6.7%, p < 0.0001) and had a higher proportion of grade IV injuries (18.5% vs 9.2%, p = 0.0021), with no difference in admission systolic blood pressure (116 vs 116, p = 0.960) or Injury Severity Score (31 vs 33, p = 0.150). Management strategies were similar between groups, including nonoperative (37.3% vs 36.9%, p = 0.932), open (4.2% vs 1.9%, p = 0.132), and endovascular repair (58.5% vs 61.1%, p = 0.584). Despite comparable treatment approaches, geriatric patients had higher in-hospital mortality (27.1% vs 10.9%, p < 0.0001) and aortic-related mortality (8.5% vs 3.4%, p = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Geriatric patients with BTAI sustain more severe injuries and experience significantly higher mortality despite similar management strategies. These findings suggest that current treatment paradigms may not adequately address age-associated risk and highlight the need for age-specific management considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"1202-1207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000002051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The management of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is evolving as the trauma population ages, yet the impact of age on treatment patterns and outcomes remains incompletely defined.
Study design: A retrospective analysis of the Aortic Trauma Foundation registry (November 2016 to November 2023) identified 823 patients with BTAI, including 118 geriatric patients (65 years and older). Demographics, injury characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes were compared between the geriatric and younger (younger than 65 years) cohorts.
Results: Geriatric patients more frequently presented after falls (17.8% vs 6.7%, p < 0.0001) and had a higher proportion of grade IV injuries (18.5% vs 9.2%, p = 0.0021), with no difference in admission systolic blood pressure (116 vs 116, p = 0.960) or Injury Severity Score (31 vs 33, p = 0.150). Management strategies were similar between groups, including nonoperative (37.3% vs 36.9%, p = 0.932), open (4.2% vs 1.9%, p = 0.132), and endovascular repair (58.5% vs 61.1%, p = 0.584). Despite comparable treatment approaches, geriatric patients had higher in-hospital mortality (27.1% vs 10.9%, p < 0.0001) and aortic-related mortality (8.5% vs 3.4%, p = 0.010).
Conclusions: Geriatric patients with BTAI sustain more severe injuries and experience significantly higher mortality despite similar management strategies. These findings suggest that current treatment paradigms may not adequately address age-associated risk and highlight the need for age-specific management considerations.
背景:钝性胸主动脉损伤(BTAI)的治疗随着创伤人群的老龄化而发展,但年龄对治疗模式和结果的影响仍不完全明确。研究设计:对主动脉创伤基金会登记(2016年11月- 2023年11月)的823例BTAI患者进行回顾性分析,其中包括118例老年患者(≥65岁)。结果:老年患者在跌倒后出现的频率更高(17.8% vs 6.7%)。结论:尽管采用类似的治疗策略,老年BTAI患者的损伤更严重,死亡率也更高。这些发现表明,目前的治疗模式可能不能充分解决与年龄相关的风险,并强调需要针对特定年龄的管理考虑。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.