A Multi-Compartment Cytological Approach to Severe Asthma Phenotyping: The BRISA Study (Biomedical Research in Severe Asthma).

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Pub Date : 2026-05-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JAA.S591415
Javier Domínguez-Ortega, Gabriela Leon-Zambrana, José Antonio Cañas, Ismael García-Moguel, Juan Manuel Igea, Marcela Valverde-Monge, María Luisa Caballero, Mar Gandolfo-Cano, Leticia De Las Vecillas, Santiago Quirce, Victoria Del Pozo
{"title":"A Multi-Compartment Cytological Approach to Severe Asthma Phenotyping: The BRISA Study (Biomedical Research in Severe Asthma).","authors":"Javier Domínguez-Ortega, Gabriela Leon-Zambrana, José Antonio Cañas, Ismael García-Moguel, Juan Manuel Igea, Marcela Valverde-Monge, María Luisa Caballero, Mar Gandolfo-Cano, Leticia De Las Vecillas, Santiago Quirce, Victoria Del Pozo","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S591415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate inflammatory phenotyping in asthma remains challenging. Nasal cytology has emerged as a potential non-invasive tool to assess airway inflammation in asthma. However, its relationship with lower airway inflammation and systemic biomarkers remains unclear, particularly in severe asthma (SA).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether a multi-compartment approach could improve the characterisation of type 2 inflammation and the relationship between nasal cytology, induced sputum, and systemic inflammatory biomarkers in patients with severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional exploratory BRISA study, twenty-two patients with SA underwent nasal cytology by mucosal scraping, induced sputum analysis, and serum biomarker assessment (periostin, eosinophil cationic protein, thymic stromal lymphopoietin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4, and total IgE). Patients were stratified according to blood eosinophil count (BEC <300 vs ≥300 cells/µL). Correlations between compartments and associations with clinical and inflammatory variables were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher blood eosinophil counts were associated with worse lung function, increased exacerbations, and higher serum periostin levels. Valid induced sputum samples were obtained in 16 patients: 7 eosinophilic, 3 neutrophilic, 2 mixed eosinophilic-neutrophilic and 4 paucigranulocytic. Nasal cytology predominantly showed limited agreement with induced sputum inflammatory phenotypes. Serum TSLP, DPP4, and IgE also showed an upward trend in patients with higher blood eosinophil counts, although these differences were not statistically significant. Correlation analysis demonstrated a significant positive association between sputum and blood eosinophils, as well as between blood eosinophils and serum periostin. A strong positive correlation was also observed between serum eotaxin and TSLP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nasal cytology alone cannot replace induced sputum for inflammatory phenotyping in SA, although it may provide complementary information on upper airway inflammation. Among the evaluated systemic biomarkers, periostin emerged as the most consistent marker associated with blood eosinophilia, while other biomarkers showed only non-significant trends. Further studies are needed to validate the role of combined biomarkers in predicting airway inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"19 ","pages":"591415"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13220835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S591415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate inflammatory phenotyping in asthma remains challenging. Nasal cytology has emerged as a potential non-invasive tool to assess airway inflammation in asthma. However, its relationship with lower airway inflammation and systemic biomarkers remains unclear, particularly in severe asthma (SA).

Objective: To evaluate whether a multi-compartment approach could improve the characterisation of type 2 inflammation and the relationship between nasal cytology, induced sputum, and systemic inflammatory biomarkers in patients with severe asthma.

Methods: In this cross-sectional exploratory BRISA study, twenty-two patients with SA underwent nasal cytology by mucosal scraping, induced sputum analysis, and serum biomarker assessment (periostin, eosinophil cationic protein, thymic stromal lymphopoietin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4, and total IgE). Patients were stratified according to blood eosinophil count (BEC <300 vs ≥300 cells/µL). Correlations between compartments and associations with clinical and inflammatory variables were analysed.

Results: Higher blood eosinophil counts were associated with worse lung function, increased exacerbations, and higher serum periostin levels. Valid induced sputum samples were obtained in 16 patients: 7 eosinophilic, 3 neutrophilic, 2 mixed eosinophilic-neutrophilic and 4 paucigranulocytic. Nasal cytology predominantly showed limited agreement with induced sputum inflammatory phenotypes. Serum TSLP, DPP4, and IgE also showed an upward trend in patients with higher blood eosinophil counts, although these differences were not statistically significant. Correlation analysis demonstrated a significant positive association between sputum and blood eosinophils, as well as between blood eosinophils and serum periostin. A strong positive correlation was also observed between serum eotaxin and TSLP.

Conclusion: Nasal cytology alone cannot replace induced sputum for inflammatory phenotyping in SA, although it may provide complementary information on upper airway inflammation. Among the evaluated systemic biomarkers, periostin emerged as the most consistent marker associated with blood eosinophilia, while other biomarkers showed only non-significant trends. Further studies are needed to validate the role of combined biomarkers in predicting airway inflammation.

严重哮喘表型的多室细胞学方法:BRISA研究(严重哮喘的生物医学研究)。
背景:准确的哮喘炎症表型仍然具有挑战性。鼻细胞学已成为评估哮喘气道炎症的潜在非侵入性工具。然而,其与下气道炎症和全身生物标志物的关系尚不清楚,特别是在严重哮喘(SA)中。目的:评估多室方法是否可以改善重度哮喘患者2型炎症的特征,以及鼻细胞学、诱导痰和全身炎症生物标志物之间的关系。方法:在这项横断面探索性BRISA研究中,22例SA患者通过粘膜刮拭、诱导痰分析和血清生物标志物评估(骨膜蛋白、嗜酸性阳离子蛋白、胸腺基质淋巴生成素、二肽基肽酶-4和总IgE)进行了鼻细胞学检查。根据血嗜酸性粒细胞计数(BEC)对患者进行分层。结果:血嗜酸性粒细胞计数越高,肺功能越差,加重程度越高,血清骨膜蛋白水平越高。16例患者获得有效诱导痰标本,其中嗜酸性7例,中性3例,嗜酸性-中性混合2例,少粒细胞4例。鼻细胞学主要显示与诱导痰炎症表型有限的一致。血清TSLP、DPP4和IgE在嗜酸性粒细胞计数较高的患者中也呈上升趋势,但这些差异无统计学意义。相关分析表明,痰液与血嗜酸性粒细胞、血嗜酸性粒细胞与血清骨膜蛋白呈显著正相关。血清eotaxin与TSLP呈显著正相关。结论:鼻细胞学检查不能单独代替诱导痰诊断SA的炎症表型,尽管它可以为上呼吸道炎症提供补充信息。在评估的全身生物标志物中,骨膜蛋白是与嗜酸性粒细胞最一致的标志物,而其他生物标志物仅显示出不显著的趋势。需要进一步的研究来验证联合生物标志物在预测气道炎症中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
185
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies. Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书