Efficacy and Adherence of Combined Fluticasone Propionate and Azelastine Nasal Spray Versus Fluticasone Propionate Alone in Pediatric Allergic Rhinitis.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Figen Çelebi Çelik, Özlem Sancaklı, Özgen Soyöz, İdil Akay Hacı, Mehmet Şirin Kaya, Ayça Demir, Canan Ş Karkıner, Demet Can
{"title":"Efficacy and Adherence of Combined Fluticasone Propionate and Azelastine Nasal Spray Versus Fluticasone Propionate Alone in Pediatric Allergic Rhinitis.","authors":"Figen Çelebi Çelik, Özlem Sancaklı, Özgen Soyöz, İdil Akay Hacı, Mehmet Şirin Kaya, Ayça Demir, Canan Ş Karkıner, Demet Can","doi":"10.4168/aair.2026.18.3.417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) and their combination with intranasal antihistamines (INCS/INAH) are treatment options for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). Therefore, we aimed to prospectively compare these two different intranasal therapies regarding symptom scores, quality of life (QoL), and treatment adherence in adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included pediatric patients aged 12-18 years, diagnosed with moderate-to-severe AR. Patients' symptom severity at baseline and at the one- and two-month follow-ups was assessed using the Total Nasal Symptoms Score (TNSS); additionally, QoL and treatment adherence were measured via the Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) and Medication Adherence Reporting Scale (MARS), respectively. These scores were compared between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 79 patients with moderate-to-severe AR. Thirty-five patients (44.3%) had concomitant allergic diseases, and 28 (35.4%) had asthma. INCS (fluticasone propionate) therapy was started in 41 patients (51.9%), and combination therapy (azelastine hydrochloride + fluticasone propionate [AzeFlu]) was started in 38 patients (48.1%). Treatment adherence (MARS) was higher in the AzeFlu group (<i>P</i> = 0.002; odds ratio, 5.111; 95% confidence interval, 1.776-14.711). A positive correlation was found between treatment adherence and parental education levels (<i>P</i> = 0.002, <i>r</i> = 0.373 for mothers; <i>P</i> = 0.004, <i>r</i> = 0.351 for fathers). TNSS and PRQLQ scores were improved in treatment adherence patients (<i>P</i> = 0.001, <i>P</i> = 0.047). There were no significantly differences in TNSS and PRQLQ scores between the treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AzeFlu therapy may be preferred in patients with persistent symptoms and unresponsive to other treatments. Especially in adolescent children with persistent AR, AzeFlu should be considered as first-line treatment to increase treatment adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":7547,"journal":{"name":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","volume":"18 3","pages":"417-427"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13226864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2026.18.3.417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) and their combination with intranasal antihistamines (INCS/INAH) are treatment options for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). Therefore, we aimed to prospectively compare these two different intranasal therapies regarding symptom scores, quality of life (QoL), and treatment adherence in adolescents.

Methods: The study included pediatric patients aged 12-18 years, diagnosed with moderate-to-severe AR. Patients' symptom severity at baseline and at the one- and two-month follow-ups was assessed using the Total Nasal Symptoms Score (TNSS); additionally, QoL and treatment adherence were measured via the Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) and Medication Adherence Reporting Scale (MARS), respectively. These scores were compared between treatment groups.

Results: The study included 79 patients with moderate-to-severe AR. Thirty-five patients (44.3%) had concomitant allergic diseases, and 28 (35.4%) had asthma. INCS (fluticasone propionate) therapy was started in 41 patients (51.9%), and combination therapy (azelastine hydrochloride + fluticasone propionate [AzeFlu]) was started in 38 patients (48.1%). Treatment adherence (MARS) was higher in the AzeFlu group (P = 0.002; odds ratio, 5.111; 95% confidence interval, 1.776-14.711). A positive correlation was found between treatment adherence and parental education levels (P = 0.002, r = 0.373 for mothers; P = 0.004, r = 0.351 for fathers). TNSS and PRQLQ scores were improved in treatment adherence patients (P = 0.001, P = 0.047). There were no significantly differences in TNSS and PRQLQ scores between the treatment groups.

Conclusions: AzeFlu therapy may be preferred in patients with persistent symptoms and unresponsive to other treatments. Especially in adolescent children with persistent AR, AzeFlu should be considered as first-line treatment to increase treatment adherence.

丙酸氟替卡松联合阿兹elastine鼻喷雾剂与单独丙酸氟替卡松治疗儿童变应性鼻炎的疗效和依从性。
目的:鼻内皮质类固醇(INCS)及其联合鼻内抗组胺药(INCS/INAH)是变应性鼻炎(AR)患者的治疗选择。因此,我们旨在前瞻性地比较这两种不同的鼻内治疗在症状评分、生活质量(QoL)和治疗依从性方面对青少年的影响。方法:研究纳入12-18岁,诊断为中重度AR的儿科患者,使用鼻症状总评分(TNSS)评估患者在基线和随访1个月和2个月时的症状严重程度;此外,分别通过儿童鼻结膜炎生活质量问卷(PRQLQ)和药物依从性报告量表(MARS)测量生活质量和治疗依从性。这些分数在治疗组之间进行比较。结果:本研究纳入79例中重度AR患者,伴有过敏性疾病35例(44.3%),哮喘28例(35.4%)。41例(51.9%)患者开始使用INCS(丙酸氟替卡松)治疗,38例(48.1%)患者开始使用联合治疗(盐酸氮扎elastine +丙酸氟替卡松[AzeFlu])。AzeFlu组治疗依从性(MARS)较高(P = 0.002;优势比为5.111;95%可信区间为1.776-14.711)。治疗依从性与父母教育程度呈正相关(母亲P = 0.002, r = 0.373;父亲P = 0.004, r = 0.351)。治疗依从性患者的TNSS和PRQLQ评分均有改善(P = 0.001, P = 0.047)。两组间TNSS和PRQLQ评分无显著差异。结论:对于症状持续且对其他治疗无反应的患者,首选AzeFlu治疗。特别是对于持续性AR的青少年儿童,应考虑将AzeFlu作为一线治疗,以增加治疗依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.80%
发文量
53
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal features cutting-edge original research, brief communications, and state-of-the-art reviews in the specialties of allergy, asthma, and immunology, including clinical and experimental studies and instructive case reports. Contemporary reviews summarize information on topics for researchers and physicians in the fields of allergy and immunology. As of January 2017, AAIR do not accept case reports. However, if it is a clinically important case, authors can submit it in the form of letter to the Editor. Editorials and letters to the Editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion among physicians dealing with allergy, immunology, pediatric respirology, and related medical fields. AAIR also features topics in practice and management and recent advances in equipment and techniques for clinicians concerned with clinical manifestations of allergies and pediatric respiratory diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书