Oncological outcome and immune-checkpoint-blockade-induced toxicities in patients with cervical cancer - a Norwegian real-world cohort.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Katharina Bischof, Keira Matallah Fredriksen, Margrethe Bjørnstad, Mari Bunkholt Elstrand, Brynhildur Eyjolfsdottir, Alda Birgisdottir, Elisabeth Lillo, Guro Aune, Kristina Lindemann
{"title":"Oncological outcome and immune-checkpoint-blockade-induced toxicities in patients with cervical cancer - a Norwegian real-world cohort.","authors":"Katharina Bischof, Keira Matallah Fredriksen, Margrethe Bjørnstad, Mari Bunkholt Elstrand, Brynhildur Eyjolfsdottir, Alda Birgisdottir, Elisabeth Lillo, Guro Aune, Kristina Lindemann","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2026.45737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into the treatment of patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer has been shown to significantly prolong survival. In this study, we examined the clinical outcomes and tolerability of treatment with ICIs in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer in a real-world setting in Norway. Patient/material and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated with an ICI in combination with chemotherapy or as single agent at Oslo University Hospital between 2016 and 2024. The primary oncological endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS) as well as tolerability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 57 patients with a median age of 53 years and a median follow-up of 15.2 months. Thirty-five patients were treated with an ICI in combination with chemotherapy (cohort 1), and or an ICI alone (n = 22) (cohort 2). Forty-six patients (81%) were treated for recurrent disease. In cohort 1, the median PFS was 12.4 months (95% CI: 9.0-15.7), and the median OS was 27.5 months (95% CI: 18.0-37.1). In cohort 2, the median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.4-5.0), and the median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 4.3-14.4). Nine patients (16%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our real-world data on the use of ICIs alone or in combination showed antitumour efficacy comparable to that reported in clinical studies in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Our discontinuation rate highlights that toxicity management and mitigation are paramount when novel drugs are introduced in clinical algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"65 ","pages":"518-524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13234913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2026.45737","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into the treatment of patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer has been shown to significantly prolong survival. In this study, we examined the clinical outcomes and tolerability of treatment with ICIs in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer in a real-world setting in Norway. Patient/material and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated with an ICI in combination with chemotherapy or as single agent at Oslo University Hospital between 2016 and 2024. The primary oncological endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS) as well as tolerability.

Results: We included 57 patients with a median age of 53 years and a median follow-up of 15.2 months. Thirty-five patients were treated with an ICI in combination with chemotherapy (cohort 1), and or an ICI alone (n = 22) (cohort 2). Forty-six patients (81%) were treated for recurrent disease. In cohort 1, the median PFS was 12.4 months (95% CI: 9.0-15.7), and the median OS was 27.5 months (95% CI: 18.0-37.1). In cohort 2, the median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.4-5.0), and the median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI: 4.3-14.4). Nine patients (16%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity.

Interpretation: Our real-world data on the use of ICIs alone or in combination showed antitumour efficacy comparable to that reported in clinical studies in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. Our discontinuation rate highlights that toxicity management and mitigation are paramount when novel drugs are introduced in clinical algorithms.

宫颈癌患者的肿瘤预后和免疫检查点阻断诱导的毒性-挪威现实世界队列。
背景和目的:将免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)引入转移性或复发性宫颈癌患者的治疗已被证明可显着延长生存期。在这项研究中,我们在挪威的一个真实环境中检查了转移性或复发性宫颈癌患者使用ICIs治疗的临床结果和耐受性。患者/材料和方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2016年至2024年间在奥斯陆大学医院接受ICI联合化疗或单药治疗的患者。主要肿瘤终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)和耐受性。结果:我们纳入了57例患者,中位年龄53岁,中位随访时间15.2个月。35例患者接受ICI联合化疗(队列1),或单独使用ICI (n = 22)(队列2)。46例(81%)因复发性疾病接受治疗。在队列1中,中位PFS为12.4个月(95% CI: 9.0-15.7),中位OS为27.5个月(95% CI: 18.0-37.1)。队列2中,中位PFS为3.7个月(95% CI: 2.4-5.0),中位OS为9.3个月(95% CI: 4.3-14.4)。9例患者(16%)因毒性停止治疗。解释:我们关于单独或联合使用ICIs的实际数据显示,在晚期或复发宫颈癌患者的临床研究中,ICIs的抗肿瘤疗效与报告的相当。我们的停药率强调,当在临床算法中引入新药时,毒性管理和缓解是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书