Nutrient intakes and dietary compliance in cardiac patients: 6-year follow-up.

Human nutrition. Applied nutrition Pub Date : 1987-10-01
V Reid, R Mulcahy
{"title":"Nutrient intakes and dietary compliance in cardiac patients: 6-year follow-up.","authors":"V Reid,&nbsp;R Mulcahy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Changes in nutrient intakes which were recorded in the diets of cardiac patients at 1-year follow-up were maintained at 6-year follow-up, with the exception of fibre intake. Twenty-three patients, 60 per cent of the original study, were available for assessment at 6-year follow-up. The majority of these patients (74 per cent) had been classified as good compliers at 1-year follow-up. They had maintained the nutrient intakes observed at 1-year follow-up, except for fibre intake which had been reduced. Nutrient intakes of the small number of poor compliers (26 per cent) tended to deteriorate between 1- and 6-year follow-up. Body weight, which was reduced at 1-year follow-up, had increased to initial levels at 6-year follow-up for the total group. Poor compliers showed the greatest increase in weight. Serum cholesterol levels showed little change throughout the study for all patients. Compliance at 1-year follow-up appeared to determine compliance over the longer follow-up period for the study patients and especially for good compliers. More attention needs to be given to evaluating the factors which influence compliance, in particular dietary compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":77856,"journal":{"name":"Human nutrition. Applied nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human nutrition. Applied nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Changes in nutrient intakes which were recorded in the diets of cardiac patients at 1-year follow-up were maintained at 6-year follow-up, with the exception of fibre intake. Twenty-three patients, 60 per cent of the original study, were available for assessment at 6-year follow-up. The majority of these patients (74 per cent) had been classified as good compliers at 1-year follow-up. They had maintained the nutrient intakes observed at 1-year follow-up, except for fibre intake which had been reduced. Nutrient intakes of the small number of poor compliers (26 per cent) tended to deteriorate between 1- and 6-year follow-up. Body weight, which was reduced at 1-year follow-up, had increased to initial levels at 6-year follow-up for the total group. Poor compliers showed the greatest increase in weight. Serum cholesterol levels showed little change throughout the study for all patients. Compliance at 1-year follow-up appeared to determine compliance over the longer follow-up period for the study patients and especially for good compliers. More attention needs to be given to evaluating the factors which influence compliance, in particular dietary compliance.

心脏病患者的营养摄入和饮食依从性:6年随访。
1年随访中记录的心脏病患者饮食中营养摄入的变化在6年随访中保持不变,纤维摄入量除外。23名患者,占原始研究的60%,在6年的随访中可进行评估。这些患者中的大多数(74%)在1年随访时被归类为良好的合规者。他们保持了1年随访时观察到的营养摄入量,除了纤维摄入量有所减少。少数不良编制者(26%)的营养摄入量在1至6年随访期间趋于恶化。在1年的随访中,体重有所下降,但在6年的随访中,整个组的体重增加到初始水平。糟糕的编译器显示出最大的重量增加。在整个研究过程中,所有患者的血清胆固醇水平几乎没有变化。1年随访时的依从性似乎决定了研究患者在更长的随访期间的依从性,特别是对于良好的依从性。需要更加注意评价影响依从性的因素,特别是饮食依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信