Aura Cecilia Jimenez-Moreno, Alasdair Blain, Cathy Anne Pinto, Vikas Soekhai, Jennifer Viberg Johansson, Christine Dyer, Kate Adcock, Esther W. de Bekker-Grob, G. Ardine de Wit, Jane Newman, Gráinne S. Gorman
{"title":"Patient Preferences in Neuromuscular Diseases: Insights for Future Drug Development","authors":"Aura Cecilia Jimenez-Moreno, Alasdair Blain, Cathy Anne Pinto, Vikas Soekhai, Jennifer Viberg Johansson, Christine Dyer, Kate Adcock, Esther W. de Bekker-Grob, G. Ardine de Wit, Jane Newman, Gráinne S. Gorman","doi":"10.1002/jmd2.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Incorporating patient preferences into drug development is crucial, particularly, for rare diseases with significant unmet needs. This study used Best-Worst Scaling type 2 (BWS-2) to explore benefit–risk trade-offs for patients and caregivers in two rare neuromuscular diseases (NMDs), myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), and mitochondrial myopathy (MM). Patients with DM1 and MM, along with caregivers, completed a BWS-2 survey assessing four treatment benefits (muscle strength, energy and endurance, balance, cognition) and two risks (permanent liver damage, temporary blurring of vision). Participants were stratified by disease group and age of onset (< 20, ≥ 20 years). A latent class analysis was used to calculate the relative importance of each treatment attribute. Sociodemographic and disease-related data were also collected. A total of 270 participants (DM1 <i>n</i> = 143, MM <i>n</i> = 127, including 37 caregivers) were included. BWS-2 results revealed a priority for improvements in muscle strength (24%), and energy and endurance (23%) across all groups, with caregivers placing a higher priority on cognition improvements (17%) compared to patients. There were no significant differences between disease groups or by age of onset. This study underscores the importance of patient preferences in drug development for rare NMDs. The consensus on treatment priorities across both diseases suggests that overlapping clinical features can inform and expedite future NMD or rare disease drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":14930,"journal":{"name":"JIMD reports","volume":"67 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmd2.70100","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JIMD reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmd2.70100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Incorporating patient preferences into drug development is crucial, particularly, for rare diseases with significant unmet needs. This study used Best-Worst Scaling type 2 (BWS-2) to explore benefit–risk trade-offs for patients and caregivers in two rare neuromuscular diseases (NMDs), myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), and mitochondrial myopathy (MM). Patients with DM1 and MM, along with caregivers, completed a BWS-2 survey assessing four treatment benefits (muscle strength, energy and endurance, balance, cognition) and two risks (permanent liver damage, temporary blurring of vision). Participants were stratified by disease group and age of onset (< 20, ≥ 20 years). A latent class analysis was used to calculate the relative importance of each treatment attribute. Sociodemographic and disease-related data were also collected. A total of 270 participants (DM1 n = 143, MM n = 127, including 37 caregivers) were included. BWS-2 results revealed a priority for improvements in muscle strength (24%), and energy and endurance (23%) across all groups, with caregivers placing a higher priority on cognition improvements (17%) compared to patients. There were no significant differences between disease groups or by age of onset. This study underscores the importance of patient preferences in drug development for rare NMDs. The consensus on treatment priorities across both diseases suggests that overlapping clinical features can inform and expedite future NMD or rare disease drug development.
将患者偏好纳入药物开发至关重要,特别是对于有大量未满足需求的罕见疾病。本研究使用Best-Worst Scaling type 2 (BWS-2)来探讨两种罕见神经肌肉疾病(NMDs),即1型肌强直营养不良症(DM1)和线粒体肌病(MM)的患者和护理人员的利益-风险权衡。DM1和MM患者以及护理人员完成了一项BWS-2调查,评估了四项治疗益处(肌肉力量、能量和耐力、平衡、认知)和两项风险(永久性肝损伤、暂时视力模糊)。参与者按疾病组和发病年龄(≤20岁,≥20岁)分层。使用潜在类分析来计算每个治疗属性的相对重要性。还收集了社会人口统计和疾病相关数据。共纳入270名参与者(DM1 n = 143, MM n = 127,包括37名照顾者)。BWS-2结果显示,在所有组中,肌肉力量(24%)和能量和耐力(23%)的改善是优先考虑的,与患者相比,护理人员更优先考虑认知改善(17%)。不同疾病组或发病年龄间无显著差异。这项研究强调了罕见nmd药物开发中患者偏好的重要性。关于两种疾病的治疗重点的共识表明,重叠的临床特征可以为未来的NMD或罕见病药物开发提供信息和加速。