Patient Preferences in Neuromuscular Diseases: Insights for Future Drug Development

IF 1.8 Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
JIMD reports Pub Date : 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1002/jmd2.70100
Aura Cecilia Jimenez-Moreno, Alasdair Blain, Cathy Anne Pinto, Vikas Soekhai, Jennifer Viberg Johansson, Christine Dyer, Kate Adcock, Esther W. de Bekker-Grob, G. Ardine de Wit, Jane Newman, Gráinne S. Gorman
{"title":"Patient Preferences in Neuromuscular Diseases: Insights for Future Drug Development","authors":"Aura Cecilia Jimenez-Moreno,&nbsp;Alasdair Blain,&nbsp;Cathy Anne Pinto,&nbsp;Vikas Soekhai,&nbsp;Jennifer Viberg Johansson,&nbsp;Christine Dyer,&nbsp;Kate Adcock,&nbsp;Esther W. de Bekker-Grob,&nbsp;G. Ardine de Wit,&nbsp;Jane Newman,&nbsp;Gráinne S. Gorman","doi":"10.1002/jmd2.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Incorporating patient preferences into drug development is crucial, particularly, for rare diseases with significant unmet needs. This study used Best-Worst Scaling type 2 (BWS-2) to explore benefit–risk trade-offs for patients and caregivers in two rare neuromuscular diseases (NMDs), myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), and mitochondrial myopathy (MM). Patients with DM1 and MM, along with caregivers, completed a BWS-2 survey assessing four treatment benefits (muscle strength, energy and endurance, balance, cognition) and two risks (permanent liver damage, temporary blurring of vision). Participants were stratified by disease group and age of onset (&lt; 20, ≥ 20 years). A latent class analysis was used to calculate the relative importance of each treatment attribute. Sociodemographic and disease-related data were also collected. A total of 270 participants (DM1 <i>n</i> = 143, MM <i>n</i> = 127, including 37 caregivers) were included. BWS-2 results revealed a priority for improvements in muscle strength (24%), and energy and endurance (23%) across all groups, with caregivers placing a higher priority on cognition improvements (17%) compared to patients. There were no significant differences between disease groups or by age of onset. This study underscores the importance of patient preferences in drug development for rare NMDs. The consensus on treatment priorities across both diseases suggests that overlapping clinical features can inform and expedite future NMD or rare disease drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":14930,"journal":{"name":"JIMD reports","volume":"67 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmd2.70100","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JIMD reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmd2.70100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Incorporating patient preferences into drug development is crucial, particularly, for rare diseases with significant unmet needs. This study used Best-Worst Scaling type 2 (BWS-2) to explore benefit–risk trade-offs for patients and caregivers in two rare neuromuscular diseases (NMDs), myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), and mitochondrial myopathy (MM). Patients with DM1 and MM, along with caregivers, completed a BWS-2 survey assessing four treatment benefits (muscle strength, energy and endurance, balance, cognition) and two risks (permanent liver damage, temporary blurring of vision). Participants were stratified by disease group and age of onset (< 20, ≥ 20 years). A latent class analysis was used to calculate the relative importance of each treatment attribute. Sociodemographic and disease-related data were also collected. A total of 270 participants (DM1 n = 143, MM n = 127, including 37 caregivers) were included. BWS-2 results revealed a priority for improvements in muscle strength (24%), and energy and endurance (23%) across all groups, with caregivers placing a higher priority on cognition improvements (17%) compared to patients. There were no significant differences between disease groups or by age of onset. This study underscores the importance of patient preferences in drug development for rare NMDs. The consensus on treatment priorities across both diseases suggests that overlapping clinical features can inform and expedite future NMD or rare disease drug development.

Abstract Image

神经肌肉疾病的患者偏好:对未来药物开发的见解
将患者偏好纳入药物开发至关重要,特别是对于有大量未满足需求的罕见疾病。本研究使用Best-Worst Scaling type 2 (BWS-2)来探讨两种罕见神经肌肉疾病(NMDs),即1型肌强直营养不良症(DM1)和线粒体肌病(MM)的患者和护理人员的利益-风险权衡。DM1和MM患者以及护理人员完成了一项BWS-2调查,评估了四项治疗益处(肌肉力量、能量和耐力、平衡、认知)和两项风险(永久性肝损伤、暂时视力模糊)。参与者按疾病组和发病年龄(≤20岁,≥20岁)分层。使用潜在类分析来计算每个治疗属性的相对重要性。还收集了社会人口统计和疾病相关数据。共纳入270名参与者(DM1 n = 143, MM n = 127,包括37名照顾者)。BWS-2结果显示,在所有组中,肌肉力量(24%)和能量和耐力(23%)的改善是优先考虑的,与患者相比,护理人员更优先考虑认知改善(17%)。不同疾病组或发病年龄间无显著差异。这项研究强调了罕见nmd药物开发中患者偏好的重要性。关于两种疾病的治疗重点的共识表明,重叠的临床特征可以为未来的NMD或罕见病药物开发提供信息和加速。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JIMD reports
JIMD reports Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书