Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure and Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Annals of Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-31 DOI:10.1177/10600280261447498
Tingyu Wang, Tingfen Wang, Runfeng Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure and Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Tingyu Wang, Tingfen Wang, Runfeng Zhang","doi":"10.1177/10600280261447498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitute a substantial clinical burden with limited therapeutic options. While sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are established therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, their efficacy and safety profile in HFmrEF and HFpEF warrant comprehensive synthesis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, functional capacity, quality of life, and safety in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible studies compared SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo or standard care in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40%. The primary outcome was defined as CV adverse events, primarily including the composite of first hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or CV mortality (CV death), first HHF, CV death, all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, 6-minute walk test distance (6MWTD), and echocardiographic parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen randomized controlled trials comprising 18 774 patients (SGLT2 inhibitors group: 9564; control group: 9210) were included. Meta-analysis showed that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.66-0.75, <i>P</i> < 0.00001) and HHF (OR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.64-0.74; <i>P</i> < 0.00001). However, reductions in CV death (HR: 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-1.00; <i>P</i> = 0.05) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-1.02; <i>P</i> = 0.10) did not reach statistical significance. Subgroup analyses indicated consistent benefits across New York Heart Association classes, body mass index, and concomitant mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists use, with pronounced efficacy observed in patients with renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²). Furthermore, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improved KCCQ-total symptom score, 6MWTD, <i>E</i>/<i>e</i>' ratio.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SGLT2 inhibitors effectively improve the risk of composite CV death and HHF in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, while concurrently improving functional status and quality of life. These findings support the use of SGLT2 inhibitors as a foundational therapy for these populations, although their independent effect on mortality endpoints requires further elucidation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1196-1210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280261447498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitute a substantial clinical burden with limited therapeutic options. While sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are established therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, their efficacy and safety profile in HFmrEF and HFpEF warrant comprehensive synthesis.

Objective: To systematically evaluate the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, functional capacity, quality of life, and safety in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF.

Methods: Eligible studies compared SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo or standard care in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40%. The primary outcome was defined as CV adverse events, primarily including the composite of first hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or CV mortality (CV death), first HHF, CV death, all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, 6-minute walk test distance (6MWTD), and echocardiographic parameters.

Results: Eighteen randomized controlled trials comprising 18 774 patients (SGLT2 inhibitors group: 9564; control group: 9210) were included. Meta-analysis showed that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.66-0.75, P < 0.00001) and HHF (OR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.64-0.74; P < 0.00001). However, reductions in CV death (HR: 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-1.00; P = 0.05) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.92; 95% CI 0.84-1.02; P = 0.10) did not reach statistical significance. Subgroup analyses indicated consistent benefits across New York Heart Association classes, body mass index, and concomitant mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists use, with pronounced efficacy observed in patients with renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²). Furthermore, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improved KCCQ-total symptom score, 6MWTD, E/e' ratio.

Conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors effectively improve the risk of composite CV death and HHF in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, while concurrently improving functional status and quality of life. These findings support the use of SGLT2 inhibitors as a foundational therapy for these populations, although their independent effect on mortality endpoints requires further elucidation.

SGLT2抑制剂对心力衰竭和射血分数轻度降低或保留患者的疗效:一项最新的系统评价和荟萃分析
背景:心力衰竭(HF)伴射血分数轻度降低(HFmrEF)和心力衰竭伴射血分数保留(HFpEF)构成了严重的临床负担,治疗选择有限。虽然钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2 (SGLT2)抑制剂是治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的既定疗法,但其在HFmrEF和HFpEF中的疗效和安全性值得全面综合。目的:系统评估SGLT2抑制剂对HFmrEF和HFpEF患者心血管(CV)结局、功能能力、生活质量和安全性的影响。方法:符合条件的研究比较了SGLT2抑制剂与安慰剂或标准治疗在左室射血分数(LVEF)低于40%的患者中的作用。主要终点定义为CV不良事件,主要包括首次因心力衰竭(HHF)或CV死亡率(CV死亡)住院、首次HHF、CV死亡、全因死亡率。次要结果包括堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)评分、6分钟步行测试距离(6MWTD)和超声心动图参数。结果:纳入18项随机对照试验,共18774例患者(SGLT2抑制剂组9564例,对照组9210例)。荟萃分析显示,SGLT2抑制剂显著降低了主要复合终点的风险(比值比[OR]: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.66-0.75, P < 0.00001)和HHF (OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.64-0.74; P < 0.00001)。然而,CV死亡率(HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.84-1.00; P = 0.05)和全因死亡率(OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.84-1.02; P = 0.10)的降低没有达到统计学意义。亚组分析表明,在纽约心脏协会类别、体重指数和伴随使用的矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂中均有一致的益处,在肾功能损害患者中观察到明显的疗效(估计肾小球滤过率≥60 mL/min/1.73 m²)。此外,SGLT2抑制剂显著改善kccq -总症状评分、6MWTD、E/ E’比。结论:SGLT2抑制剂可有效提高HFmrEF和HFpEF患者复合CV死亡和HHF的风险,同时改善功能状态和生活质量。这些发现支持使用SGLT2抑制剂作为这些人群的基础治疗,尽管它们对死亡率终点的独立影响需要进一步阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书