Assessing the factors influencing the quality of pocket-conditioned 3D generative models

IF 7.9 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Journal of Cheminformatics Pub Date : 2026-05-30 Epub Date: 2026-06-24 DOI:10.1186/s13321-026-01230-5
Kunyu Wang, Helen Lai, Ross Irwin, Jon Paul Janet, Alessandro Tibo
{"title":"Assessing the factors influencing the quality of pocket-conditioned 3D generative models","authors":"Kunyu Wang,&nbsp;Helen Lai,&nbsp;Ross Irwin,&nbsp;Jon Paul Janet,&nbsp;Alessandro Tibo","doi":"10.1186/s13321-026-01230-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Structure-based drug discovery (SBDD) aims to identify novel molecules that bind to therapeutic protein targets. The vast chemical space and limitations of traditional approaches make this task challenging. Recent advances in AI-generative models, such as flow matching, can produce novel, pocket-conditioned molecular structures directly in three-dimensional space. However, most pocket conditioned models in the literature are trained on structures derived from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), which contains structures with varying quality and inconsistent annotation. Moreover, the PDB is enriched with cofactors and natural products, thereby poorly representing real world SBDD scenarios. The relatively limited number of ligand series within the same pockets also hinder the model’s ability to learn protein-ligand interactions effectively. Here for the first time we report the results of training pocket-conditioned generative models on internal crystallography data from a large pharmaceutical company. We also investigate other key determinants of model performance, such as inclusion of hydrogens and pretraining on unconditional data. We evaluate how each factor affects the generative quality of the ligands across the diverse training settings. Our results provide practical guidelines for the development of more effective 3D generative models for SBDD and highlight key directions for future research toward reliable, pocket-aware molecular design.  </p></div>","PeriodicalId":617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cheminformatics","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13321-026-01230-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cheminformatics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13321-026-01230-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Structure-based drug discovery (SBDD) aims to identify novel molecules that bind to therapeutic protein targets. The vast chemical space and limitations of traditional approaches make this task challenging. Recent advances in AI-generative models, such as flow matching, can produce novel, pocket-conditioned molecular structures directly in three-dimensional space. However, most pocket conditioned models in the literature are trained on structures derived from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), which contains structures with varying quality and inconsistent annotation. Moreover, the PDB is enriched with cofactors and natural products, thereby poorly representing real world SBDD scenarios. The relatively limited number of ligand series within the same pockets also hinder the model’s ability to learn protein-ligand interactions effectively. Here for the first time we report the results of training pocket-conditioned generative models on internal crystallography data from a large pharmaceutical company. We also investigate other key determinants of model performance, such as inclusion of hydrogens and pretraining on unconditional data. We evaluate how each factor affects the generative quality of the ligands across the diverse training settings. Our results provide practical guidelines for the development of more effective 3D generative models for SBDD and highlight key directions for future research toward reliable, pocket-aware molecular design.  

评估影响口袋条件三维生成模型质量的因素。
基于结构的药物发现(SBDD)旨在识别结合治疗蛋白靶点的新分子。巨大的化学空间和传统方法的局限性使这项任务具有挑战性。人工智能生成模型的最新进展,如流量匹配,可以直接在三维空间中产生新颖的、口袋条件的分子结构。然而,文献中的大多数口袋条件模型都是在来自蛋白质数据库(PDB)的结构上进行训练的,这些结构包含质量不一和注释不一致的结构。此外,PDB充满了辅助因子和自然产物,因此不能很好地表示现实世界的SBDD场景。同一口袋内相对有限数量的配体系列也阻碍了模型有效学习蛋白质-配体相互作用的能力。在这里,我们首次报告了在一家大型制药公司的内部晶体学数据上训练口袋条件生成模型的结果。我们还研究了模型性能的其他关键决定因素,例如氢的包含和无条件数据的预训练。我们评估了每个因素如何在不同的训练设置中影响配体的生成质量。我们的研究结果为开发更有效的SBDD 3D生成模型提供了实用指南,并为未来可靠的口袋感知分子设计研究提供了关键方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cheminformatics
Journal of Cheminformatics CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Cheminformatics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all aspects of cheminformatics and molecular modelling. Coverage includes, but is not limited to: chemical information systems, software and databases, and molecular modelling, chemical structure representations and their use in structure, substructure, and similarity searching of chemical substance and chemical reaction databases, computer and molecular graphics, computer-aided molecular design, expert systems, QSAR, and data mining techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书