Influence of Geometry and Size on Precision and Accuracy in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Additive Manufacturing

Nikodmose Moges Gebre, Ilaria Cristofolini, Marco Zago, Pasquale Gallo
{"title":"Influence of Geometry and Size on Precision and Accuracy in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Additive Manufacturing","authors":"Nikodmose Moges Gebre,&nbsp;Ilaria Cristofolini,&nbsp;Marco Zago,&nbsp;Pasquale Gallo","doi":"10.1155/mdp2/7177386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study presents a systematic evaluation of the dimensional accuracy and process capability of fused deposition modeling (FDM) additive manufacturing, with emphasis on the influence of process-induced thermal and kinematic effects on dimensional performance. Two geometries made of polylactic acid (PLA) were considered: a staircase specimen to assess process capability and directional effects, and a geometric benchmark test artifact (GBTA) to evaluate dimensional reliability across representative features. Measurements were performed using a digital caliper for the staircase model and a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) for the GBTA. Under manufacturer-recommended, unoptimized printing conditions, staircase analysis showed that the investigated FDM system achieved process performance indices (<i>P</i><sub><i>m</i></sub> and <i>P</i><sub><i>m</i><i>k</i></sub>) ≥ 1.33 at a 95% confidence level. Dimensional stability varied across the build chamber due to spatially nonuniform cooling conditions, with statistically significant position-dependent deviations observed particularly along the build direction. Larger features exhibited higher relative precision. Achievable ISO 286-1 International Tolerance grades ranged from IT9 to IT14. GBTA results confirmed systematic undersizing of cylindrical and curved features. Absolute dimensional deviations remained approximately constant across nominal sizes, whereas percentage errors increased for smaller features due to scale effects. Despite these variations, the geometric form was preserved, demonstrating high repeatability. The proposed capability-based evaluation framework provides a structured approach to quantifying dimensional reliability in polymer-based material extrusion processes for functional components.</p>","PeriodicalId":100886,"journal":{"name":"Material Design & Processing Communications","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/mdp2/7177386","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Material Design & Processing Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/mdp2/7177386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a systematic evaluation of the dimensional accuracy and process capability of fused deposition modeling (FDM) additive manufacturing, with emphasis on the influence of process-induced thermal and kinematic effects on dimensional performance. Two geometries made of polylactic acid (PLA) were considered: a staircase specimen to assess process capability and directional effects, and a geometric benchmark test artifact (GBTA) to evaluate dimensional reliability across representative features. Measurements were performed using a digital caliper for the staircase model and a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) for the GBTA. Under manufacturer-recommended, unoptimized printing conditions, staircase analysis showed that the investigated FDM system achieved process performance indices (Pm and Pmk) ≥ 1.33 at a 95% confidence level. Dimensional stability varied across the build chamber due to spatially nonuniform cooling conditions, with statistically significant position-dependent deviations observed particularly along the build direction. Larger features exhibited higher relative precision. Achievable ISO 286-1 International Tolerance grades ranged from IT9 to IT14. GBTA results confirmed systematic undersizing of cylindrical and curved features. Absolute dimensional deviations remained approximately constant across nominal sizes, whereas percentage errors increased for smaller features due to scale effects. Despite these variations, the geometric form was preserved, demonstrating high repeatability. The proposed capability-based evaluation framework provides a structured approach to quantifying dimensional reliability in polymer-based material extrusion processes for functional components.

Abstract Image

几何形状和尺寸对FDM增材制造精度和精度的影响
本研究对熔融沉积建模(FDM)增材制造的尺寸精度和工艺能力进行了系统的评估,重点研究了工艺引起的热效应和运动学效应对尺寸性能的影响。考虑了由聚乳酸(PLA)制成的两种几何形状:用于评估工艺能力和方向影响的阶梯试样,以及用于评估代表性特征的尺寸可靠性的几何基准测试伪像(GBTA)。测量使用数字卡尺进行楼梯模型和坐标测量机(CMM)的GBTA。在制造商推荐的非优化打印条件下,阶梯分析表明,在所调查的FDM系统在95%的置信水平上实现了工艺性能指标(Pm和Pmk)≥1.33。由于空间上不均匀的冷却条件,尺寸稳定性在整个构建室中有所不同,特别是在构建方向上观察到显著的位置相关偏差。特征越大,相对精度越高。可达到的ISO 286-1国际公差等级从IT9到IT14。GBTA结果证实了圆柱形和弯曲特征的系统性低估。绝对尺寸偏差在名义尺寸上保持大致恒定,而由于尺度效应,较小的特征的百分比误差增加。尽管有这些变化,几何形状被保留下来,显示出高度的可重复性。提出的基于能力的评估框架提供了一种结构化的方法来量化功能部件聚合物基材料挤压过程的尺寸可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书