Single Parenthood and the Poverty Debate: How Pathways and Policies Explain Cross-National Differences

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Marriage and Family Pub Date : 2026-05-12 Epub Date: 2025-11-24 DOI:10.1111/jomf.70043
Roxana-Diana Burciu
{"title":"Single Parenthood and the Poverty Debate: How Pathways and Policies Explain Cross-National Differences","authors":"Roxana-Diana Burciu","doi":"10.1111/jomf.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to reveal the heterogeneity of single parents by focusing on the variation in poverty risks across countries and across pathways into single parenthood. It also adjudicates between two contrasting explanations for cross-national variation in single parent poverty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Single parenthood's strong association with poverty has long been established in both public discourse and academic research, particularly in the context of the United States. However, the reasons for cross-national differences in single-parent poverty are unclear, with both institutional and individual perspectives offering credible arguments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This study uses longitudinal panel data from the Cross-National Equivalent File from five countries (Australia, Switzerland, Germany, the UK, and the US) to address two competing explanations for cross-national differences in single-parent poverty: (1) variation in pathways into single parenthood (never marrying, divorce, widowhood, and separation) and (2) differences in policy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The research reveals substantial disparities in the prevalence of single parenthood across countries and time and exposes large heterogeneity in poverty outcomes by pathway into single parenthood. However, a decomposition analysis shows that policy remains the factor accounting for most of the cross-national differences in poverty among single parents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although pathways into single parenthood matter a lot in predicting poverty within countries, variation in social policy remains the most important factor in explaining cross-national differences in single-parent poverty.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"88 3","pages":"743-759"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.70043","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.70043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to reveal the heterogeneity of single parents by focusing on the variation in poverty risks across countries and across pathways into single parenthood. It also adjudicates between two contrasting explanations for cross-national variation in single parent poverty.

Background

Single parenthood's strong association with poverty has long been established in both public discourse and academic research, particularly in the context of the United States. However, the reasons for cross-national differences in single-parent poverty are unclear, with both institutional and individual perspectives offering credible arguments.

Method

This study uses longitudinal panel data from the Cross-National Equivalent File from five countries (Australia, Switzerland, Germany, the UK, and the US) to address two competing explanations for cross-national differences in single-parent poverty: (1) variation in pathways into single parenthood (never marrying, divorce, widowhood, and separation) and (2) differences in policy.

Results

The research reveals substantial disparities in the prevalence of single parenthood across countries and time and exposes large heterogeneity in poverty outcomes by pathway into single parenthood. However, a decomposition analysis shows that policy remains the factor accounting for most of the cross-national differences in poverty among single parents.

Conclusion

Although pathways into single parenthood matter a lot in predicting poverty within countries, variation in social policy remains the most important factor in explaining cross-national differences in single-parent poverty.

Abstract Image

单亲家庭和贫困辩论:途径和政策如何解释跨国差异
本研究旨在通过关注不同国家和不同途径的单亲家庭的贫困风险差异,揭示单亲家庭的异质性。它还对单亲家庭贫困的跨国差异做出了两种截然不同的解释。长期以来,在公共话语和学术研究中,尤其是在美国,单亲家庭与贫困的密切联系已经确立。然而,单亲家庭贫困的跨国差异的原因尚不清楚,机构和个人的观点都提供了可信的论据。本研究使用来自五个国家(澳大利亚、瑞士、德国、英国和美国)的跨国等效档案(Cross-National Equivalent File)的纵向面板数据来解决单亲贫困跨国差异的两个相互矛盾的解释:(1)通往单亲家庭的途径不同(未婚、离婚、守寡和分居);(2)政策差异。结果:研究揭示了不同国家和不同时期单亲家庭的普遍程度存在巨大差异,并揭示了进入单亲家庭的贫困结果的巨大异质性。然而,一项分解分析表明,政策仍然是造成单亲父母贫困状况跨国差异的主要因素。虽然成为单亲家庭的途径在预测国家内部的贫困方面很重要,但社会政策的变化仍然是解释单亲家庭贫困的跨国差异的最重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书