Working Toward Parenthood: Employment and First Births Among Different-Sex Couples in the United States

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Marriage and Family Pub Date : 2026-05-12 Epub Date: 2025-10-20 DOI:10.1111/jomf.70033
Kristen Lagasse Burke
{"title":"Working Toward Parenthood: Employment and First Births Among Different-Sex Couples in the United States","authors":"Kristen Lagasse Burke","doi":"10.1111/jomf.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Given the joint nature of fertility processes, this study evaluates the relationship between couples' employment characteristics and their transition to parenthood in the US.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The rise of dual-earning couples suggests progress toward gender egalitarianism. However, gendered imbalances in household responsibilities persist. Investigating whether couples with gender-traditional or gender-egalitarian arrangements are more likely to become parents offers insights into contemporary gender dynamics and the selection process into parenthood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using data on 22,314 different-sex coresidential couples' employment from the 2013–2019 Current Population Survey and their occupational characteristics from the O*NET, I estimate the average marginal effect of his and her employment status, employment investments, and job demands on couples' transition to parenthood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Dual-earning couples were the most likely to transition to parenthood, even net of earnings. Among dual-earners, there were pronounced gender differences in the employment characteristics associated with fertility. Men's full-time employment was strongly and consistently associated with transitioning to parenthood. Couples in which women worked in jobs with greater time pressure than their partners were less likely to become parents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Although dual-earning arrangements suggest progress toward egalitarianism, gendered differences in the relationship between employment and fertility persist, highlighting the persistent nature of breadwinning norms for men. These findings underscore the selection processes into parenthood and shed light on how gender inequality emerges and is reinforced across the transition to parenthood.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"88 3","pages":"615-628"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.70033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Given the joint nature of fertility processes, this study evaluates the relationship between couples' employment characteristics and their transition to parenthood in the US.

Background

The rise of dual-earning couples suggests progress toward gender egalitarianism. However, gendered imbalances in household responsibilities persist. Investigating whether couples with gender-traditional or gender-egalitarian arrangements are more likely to become parents offers insights into contemporary gender dynamics and the selection process into parenthood.

Methods

Using data on 22,314 different-sex coresidential couples' employment from the 2013–2019 Current Population Survey and their occupational characteristics from the O*NET, I estimate the average marginal effect of his and her employment status, employment investments, and job demands on couples' transition to parenthood.

Results

Dual-earning couples were the most likely to transition to parenthood, even net of earnings. Among dual-earners, there were pronounced gender differences in the employment characteristics associated with fertility. Men's full-time employment was strongly and consistently associated with transitioning to parenthood. Couples in which women worked in jobs with greater time pressure than their partners were less likely to become parents.

Conclusion

Although dual-earning arrangements suggest progress toward egalitarianism, gendered differences in the relationship between employment and fertility persist, highlighting the persistent nature of breadwinning norms for men. These findings underscore the selection processes into parenthood and shed light on how gender inequality emerges and is reinforced across the transition to parenthood.

为为人父母而努力:美国不同性别夫妇的就业和第一胎
目的考虑到生育过程的共同性质,本研究评估了美国夫妇的就业特征与他们向父母过渡之间的关系。双职工家庭的兴起表明了性别平等主义的进步。然而,家庭责任方面的性别不平衡仍然存在。调查性别传统安排或性别平等安排的夫妻是否更有可能成为父母,为当代性别动态和父母选择过程提供了见解。方法利用2013-2019年流动人口调查中22314对不同性别同居伴侣的就业数据和O*NET中不同性别同居伴侣的职业特征,估算其就业状况、就业投入和工作需求对夫妻转变为父母的平均边际效应。结果双职工家庭最有可能转变为父母,即使是净收入。在双职工中,与生育有关的就业特征存在明显的性别差异。男性的全职工作与过渡到为人父母密切相关。女性工作时间压力比其伴侣更大的夫妇成为父母的可能性更小。结论:虽然双职工制的安排表明了向平等主义的发展,但就业和生育之间的性别差异仍然存在,这突出表明了男性养家糊口规范的持久性。这些发现强调了成为父母的选择过程,并揭示了性别不平等是如何出现的,并在成为父母的过程中得到了加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书