A surrogate-based Bayesian framework for parametric calibration of URANS turbulence models informed by anisotropic pressure fluctuations

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS
Ali Eidi, Richard P. Dwight
{"title":"A surrogate-based Bayesian framework for parametric calibration of URANS turbulence models informed by anisotropic pressure fluctuations","authors":"Ali Eidi,&nbsp;Richard P. Dwight","doi":"10.1007/s10494-026-00763-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Flow-induced vibrations in wall-bounded flows remain a major challenge in many engineering applications. While fully predictive turbulence-induced vibration simulations generally require scale-resolving approaches, unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) methods are employed in practice due to their favorable computational cost. However, their predictive reliability is limited by uncertainty in turbulence-model parameters, structural model–form error, and deficiencies in representing turbulent fluctuations. This work presents a surrogate-based Bayesian calibration framework for the SST <span>\\(k\\)</span>–<span>\\(\\omega\\)</span> model, incorporating anisotropic pressure-fluctuation reconstruction to quantify and reduce model uncertainty. Global Sobol’ sensitivity analysis, surrogate modeling, and Bayesian inference are combined to identify influential parameters and assimilate high-fidelity reference data. The framework is applied to turbulent channel flow, turbulent annular flow, and a blunt-end cantilevered-rod configuration. Across all cases, the specific dissipation-rate coefficient <span>\\(\\alpha_{\\omega1}\\)</span> and the turbulent kinetic-energy dissipation coefficient <span>\\(\\beta^*\\)</span> consistently dominate variability in mean-flow quantities and reconstructed fluctuation statistics. Bayesian calibration constrains these parameters to consistent regions of the admissible space, while less influential coefficients remain weakly informed. Gaussian process regression and polynomial chaos expansion surrogates yield nearly identical posterior and predictive distributions, demonstrating robustness to surrogate choice. Remaining discrepancies with reference data are attributed primarily to structural turbulence model limitations rather than parametric uncertainty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10494-026-00763-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-026-00763-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flow-induced vibrations in wall-bounded flows remain a major challenge in many engineering applications. While fully predictive turbulence-induced vibration simulations generally require scale-resolving approaches, unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) methods are employed in practice due to their favorable computational cost. However, their predictive reliability is limited by uncertainty in turbulence-model parameters, structural model–form error, and deficiencies in representing turbulent fluctuations. This work presents a surrogate-based Bayesian calibration framework for the SST \(k\)–\(\omega\) model, incorporating anisotropic pressure-fluctuation reconstruction to quantify and reduce model uncertainty. Global Sobol’ sensitivity analysis, surrogate modeling, and Bayesian inference are combined to identify influential parameters and assimilate high-fidelity reference data. The framework is applied to turbulent channel flow, turbulent annular flow, and a blunt-end cantilevered-rod configuration. Across all cases, the specific dissipation-rate coefficient \(\alpha_{\omega1}\) and the turbulent kinetic-energy dissipation coefficient \(\beta^*\) consistently dominate variability in mean-flow quantities and reconstructed fluctuation statistics. Bayesian calibration constrains these parameters to consistent regions of the admissible space, while less influential coefficients remain weakly informed. Gaussian process regression and polynomial chaos expansion surrogates yield nearly identical posterior and predictive distributions, demonstrating robustness to surrogate choice. Remaining discrepancies with reference data are attributed primarily to structural turbulence model limitations rather than parametric uncertainty.

基于代理的各向异性压力波动的URANS湍流模型参数定标贝叶斯框架
在许多工程应用中,有壁流动中的流动诱发振动仍然是一个主要的挑战。虽然完全预测的湍流诱导振动模拟通常需要尺度分解方法,但由于其良好的计算成本,非定常reynolds -average Navier-Stokes (URANS)方法在实践中被采用。然而,它们的预测可靠性受到湍流模型参数的不确定性、结构模型形式误差和表征湍流波动的不足的限制。本文提出了一个基于代理的海温\(k\) - \(\omega\)模型贝叶斯校准框架,结合各向异性压力波动重建来量化和减少模型的不确定性。结合全局Sobol敏感性分析、代理模型和贝叶斯推理来识别影响参数并吸收高保真的参考数据。该框架适用于湍流通道流动、湍流环形流动和钝端悬臂杆结构。在所有情况下,比耗散率系数\(\alpha_{\omega1}\)和湍流动能耗散系数\(\beta^*\)始终主导着平均流量和重建波动统计的变异性。贝叶斯校准将这些参数限制在允许空间的一致区域,而影响较小的系数仍然是弱信息。高斯过程回归和多项式混沌展开替代物产生几乎相同的后验和预测分布,证明了对替代物选择的鲁棒性。其余与参考数据的差异主要归因于结构湍流模型的限制,而不是参数的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles. Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书