The impact of inclusion in a palliative care program for patients with advanced dementia

Revista clinica espanola Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-27 DOI:10.1016/j.rceng.2026.502576
C. Vicente Martín, V. de la Cuesta Esteban, N. Trapero Iglesias, A.C. Gil Abizanda, A. Sáenz de Urturi Rodríguez, J.M. Galván Román, R. Barba Martín, J.A. Rueda Camino
{"title":"The impact of inclusion in a palliative care program for patients with advanced dementia","authors":"C. Vicente Martín,&nbsp;V. de la Cuesta Esteban,&nbsp;N. Trapero Iglesias,&nbsp;A.C. Gil Abizanda,&nbsp;A. Sáenz de Urturi Rodríguez,&nbsp;J.M. Galván Román,&nbsp;R. Barba Martín,&nbsp;J.A. Rueda Camino","doi":"10.1016/j.rceng.2026.502576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite evidence, it remains unclear whether the inclusion of patients with advanced dementia (AD) in palliative care (PC) is beneficial. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of enrolment in a PC program on the subsequent clinical management of these patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study including patients with AD admitted between June 2022 and June 2025. Patients were classified into two groups: included in palliative care (PCU group) or not included (NO-PCU group). We compared the mean number of hospital care transitions, the proportion of invasive and/or life-sustaining treatments, and the total length of hospital stay. Outcomes were adjusted using negative binomial regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>298 patients were included, 149 assigned to each group, with 67% being female and a mean age of 88 years (SD 6.6). The mean number of hospital care transitions was 2.7 in the non-PCU group vs. 1.7 in the PCU group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). After adjustment for confounding, the effect remained significant: IRR 0.52 (95% CI: 0.49-0.54). Inclusion in the PCU group was associated with a significant reduction in interventional procedures -6%; 95% CI: −9.9% to -2.2%) and in the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (mean difference: −0.7; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The total hospital length of stay was 30 days (95% CI: 22.7-37.3) in the PCU group vs 111 days (95% CI: 25.6-196.4) in the non-PCU group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Inclusion in a PC program for patients with AD is associated with lower rates of hospital care transitions and reduced use of invasive procedures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94354,"journal":{"name":"Revista clinica espanola","volume":"226 7","pages":"Article 502576"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clinica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2254887426001086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite evidence, it remains unclear whether the inclusion of patients with advanced dementia (AD) in palliative care (PC) is beneficial. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of enrolment in a PC program on the subsequent clinical management of these patients.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study including patients with AD admitted between June 2022 and June 2025. Patients were classified into two groups: included in palliative care (PCU group) or not included (NO-PCU group). We compared the mean number of hospital care transitions, the proportion of invasive and/or life-sustaining treatments, and the total length of hospital stay. Outcomes were adjusted using negative binomial regression.

Results

298 patients were included, 149 assigned to each group, with 67% being female and a mean age of 88 years (SD 6.6). The mean number of hospital care transitions was 2.7 in the non-PCU group vs. 1.7 in the PCU group (p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding, the effect remained significant: IRR 0.52 (95% CI: 0.49-0.54). Inclusion in the PCU group was associated with a significant reduction in interventional procedures -6%; 95% CI: −9.9% to -2.2%) and in the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (mean difference: −0.7; p < 0.001). The total hospital length of stay was 30 days (95% CI: 22.7-37.3) in the PCU group vs 111 days (95% CI: 25.6-196.4) in the non-PCU group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Inclusion in a PC program for patients with AD is associated with lower rates of hospital care transitions and reduced use of invasive procedures.
纳入晚期痴呆患者姑息治疗计划的影响。
背景:尽管有证据,但尚不清楚将晚期痴呆(AD)患者纳入姑息治疗(PC)是否有益。本研究的目的是检查参加PC计划对这些患者后续临床管理的影响。方法:回顾性队列研究,纳入2022年6月至2025年6月住院的AD患者。患者分为两组:姑息治疗组(PCU组)和非姑息治疗组(NO-PCU组)。我们比较了医院护理转换的平均次数、侵入性和/或维持生命治疗的比例以及总住院时间。采用负二项回归调整结果。结果:纳入298例患者,每组149例,其中67%为女性,平均年龄88岁(SD 6.6)。非PCU组的平均转院次数为2.7次,PCU组为1.7次(p结论:AD患者纳入PC计划与较低的医院转院率和减少侵入性手术的使用有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书